Victory and Defeat Factor Analysis of Historic Battle using Simulation : Myeong-Ryang Sea-Battle during Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592

시뮬레이션을 이용한 역사적 전투사례의 승패요인 분석 : 임진왜란시 명량해전 사례 연구

  • Received : 2009.11.24
  • Accepted : 2010.03.03
  • Published : 2010.03.31

Abstract

Purpose of the War history's study is getting instruction by analyzing victory and defeat factor. This study is studied by qualitative form in war study mainly. In case recording literature is full, victory and defeat factor analysis is easy, but occasionally definite analysis that recording literature is feeble is difficult. Also, when it is battle result that escape common sense, about victory and defeat factor, various estimations are brought. As such example, there is Myeong-Ryang sea-battle at Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592 and Korea(Cho-Sun) naval forces did big victory in 13 vs. 133 numerical inferiorities. This study presented method of study that using agent based simulation model for quantitative analysis of these victory and defeat factor.

Keywords

References

  1. 김재근, 거북선, 정우사, 1992.
  2. 김충영, 민계료, 하석태, 강성진, 최석철, 최상영, 군사 OR 이론과 응용, 도서출판 두남, 2004.
  3. 노병천, 도해 세계전사(증보판), 21세기군사연구소, 1995.
  4. 윤영수, 채승병, 복잡계 개론, 삼성경제연구소, 2005.
  5. 이민웅, 임진왜란 해전사, 청어람미디어, 2004.
  6. KBS 역사스페셜, 역사스페셜 6, 효형출판, 2003.
  7. 나종우, "이순신 장군의 전략전술", 충무공 이순신 논문집(해전분야), 해군교육사령부(2002), pp.193-216.
  8. 송왕근, "시뮬레이터 기술 분석 및 발전방향", 함정, 해군본부, 제76호(2009), pp.227-277.
  9. 이동준, 홍윤기, "에이전트 기반 지휘통제 모의 방법론", 한국시뮬레이션학회논문지, 제16권, 제3권(2007), pp.39-48.
  10. 정성진, 조성진, 홍성필, "세포 자동자 시뮬레이션을 이용한 네트워크 중심전 효과도 평가 연구", 경영과학, 제22권, 제2호(2005), pp.135-145.
  11. 지승도, 유용준, 정찬호, "에이전트 기반의 인간 미개입형 함정전투 M&S 시스템 설계 및 서해교전 사례 연구", 한국시뮬레이션학회논문지, 제17권, 제2호(2008), pp.49-61.
  12. "제2진도대교 파노라마지도", 네이버 지도, Available:http://map.naver.com, 2009.
  13. "조선시대 전통 한선의 원형복원", 한국콘텐츠 진흥원, Available:http://koreanship.cultu re-content.com, 2009.
  14. "충무공 이순신", (사)21세기 이순신 연구회, Available:http://www.yi-sunsin.com, 2009.
  15. Brewer, G.D. and M. Shubik, The War Game :A Critique of Military Problem Solving, Harvard University Press, USA, 1979.
  16. Dunnigan, J.F., Wargames Handbook, Third Edtion:How to Play and Design Commercial and Professional Wargames, Writers Club Press, USA, 2000.
  17. Jaiswal, N.K., Military Operations Research :Quantitative Decision Making, Kluwer Academic Publishers, USA, 1997.
  18. Wells, H.G., Little Wars, Skirmisher Publishing, USA, 2004.
  19. Champagne, L., R.G. Carl, and R. Hill, "Search Theory, Agent Based Simulation, and U-boats in the Bay of Biscay," Proc. of the 2003 Winter simulation Conference, (2003), pp.991-998.
  20. Chen, P.S. and P. Chu, "Applying Lanchester's Linear Law To Model the Ardennes Campaign," Naval Research Logistics, Vol. 48(2001), pp.653-661. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.1040
  21. Ilachinski, A., "Exploring self-organized emergence in an agent-based synthetic warfare lab," Kybernetes, The International Journal of Systems and Cybernetics, Vol.32 No.1-2 (2003), pp.38-76. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920310452337
  22. Ilachinski, A., "Irreducible Semi Autonomous Adaptive Combat (ISAAC):An Artificial Life Approach to Land Combat," Military Operations Research, Vol.5 No.3(2000), pp. 29-46. https://doi.org/10.5711/morj.5.3.29
  23. Koeppel, D., "MASSIVE ATTACK," Popular Science Magazine, December 2002 edition.
  24. Lucas, T.W. and P. Turkes, "Fitting Lanchester Equation to the Battle of Krusk and Ardennes," Naval Research Logistics, Vol. 51(2004), pp.95-116. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.10101