DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Weed Control by Suppression Ability of Barley as Cover Crop in Dry Direct Seeded Rice Fields

보리를 이용한 벼 건답직파논에서의 잡초억제 효과

  • Hwang, Jae-Bok (Department of Functional Crop, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Park, Sung-Tae (Department of Functional Crop, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Song, Seok-Bo (Department of Functional Crop, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Jung, Ki-Yeoul (Department of Functional Crop, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Hwan (National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Nam, Min-Hee (Department of Functional Crop, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA)
  • Received : 2010.03.29
  • Accepted : 2010.06.16
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

This environment-friendly study was conducted to investigate the effects of winter barley as cover crop on the suppression of weeds and on the growth of dry direct seeded rice. The present study clarified the effects of winter barley as a cover crop on the weed vegetation, expressed as a multiplied ratio. In cultivation quality of rice, seedling stand was ranged from 104~112 $m^{-2}$. And, seeding stand of barley was the highest seedling stand 634 unit per $m^2$ in April 10 as compared to the other seeding dates. Furthermore, the dry weight of barley seeded in April 10 was heaviest at 146g $m^{-2}$. Rice yield was in 401kg $10a^{-1}$ in the April 10, and 517kg $10a^{-1}$ in the April 30, because of increased weeds caused by a low weed control. Effects of barley cover crop at same seeding with rice was ranged from 77~87% of control. The economic effect of barley as cover crop was analyzed to be increased by low herbicide using, despite of the slight decrease in rice yield during the period.

벼 건답직파 논에서 보리를 산파한 후 벼를 요철골 건답직파를 하여 파종시기별 피복작물에 따른 잡초발생량 및 벼의 생육 및 수량을 살펴 본 결과, 벼의 입모수는 $m^2$당 104~112개로 건답직파 적정입모수 90~130개 확보에 큰 문제는 없었다. 보리의 입모수는 4월 10일 $m^2$당 634개 이었고, 담수시 건물중이 146g으로 90% 피복되었다. 쌀 수량은 4월 10일 보리를 이용한 파종구에서 401kg $10a^{-1}$, 4월 30일 보리와 제초제 1회 파종구에서는 517kg $10a^{-1}$로 관행대비 77~99%이었으며, 잡초방제가는 77~87%이었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 농촌진흥청. 2003. 농업과학기술 연구조사 분석기준. pp. 271-290.
  2. 박성태. 2007. 제초제 대체 친환경 쌀생산 기술. 농촌진흥청 작물과학원 영남농업연구소. pp. 77-81.
  3. 서종호, 이재은, 조영손, 이충근, 윤영환, 권영업, 구자환. 2008. 호밀 피복작물 및 보전경운체계가 잡초발생과 콩 입모율에 미치는 영향. 한국잡초학회지 28(4):383-390.
  4. 유창연, 정일민. 1997. 보리, 수수의 식물체 추출물이 잡초의 발아와 초기생육에 미치는 영향. 한국환경농학회지 16(1):67-71.
  5. 임일빈, 김재덕, 이상복, 강종국, 김선, 김병수. 2005. 친환경 고품질 쌀생산 기술대책. 농촌진흥청 호남농업연구소. pp. 91-124.
  6. 천상욱. 식용추출물 이용 친환정적 작물보호전략. 2007. 농촌진흥청 영남농업연구소 심포지엄. pp. 3-33.
  7. 황동용, 김덕수, 이점식, 안종용, 홍연규, 이희우, 권오경, 김정일. 2004. 재배방법별 고품질 쌀생산 기술 개발. 농촌진흥청 영남농업연구소 시험연구보고서 pp. 174-189.
  8. Duke S. O., Dyyan F. E., Romagni J. G., and Rimando A. M. 2000. Natural products as sources of herbicides : current status and future trends. Weed Research 40:99-111. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2000.00161.x
  9. Hansen P. K., Rasmussen I. A., Holst N., and Andreasen C. 2007. Tolerance of four spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) varieties to weed harrowing. European Weed Research Society Weed Research. 47:241-251.
  10. Khanh T. D., Chung I. M., Tawata S., and Xuan T. D. 2006. Weed suppression by Passiflora edulis and its potential allelochemicals. Weed Research 46:296-303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2006.00512.x
  11. Overland L. 1966. The role of allelopathic substances in the "smother crop" barley. American Journal of Botany 16(5):423-432.
  12. Rasmussen. J., Kurtzmann J. I., and Jensen A. 2004. Tolerance of competitive spring barley cultivars to weed harrowing. Weed Research 44:446-452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2004.00419.x
  13. Saucke H., and K. Ackermann. 2006. Weed suppression in mixed cropped grain peas and false flax (Camelina sativa). Weed Research 46:453-461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2006.00530.x
  14. 藤井 義晴. 2003. アレロパン-硏究の軌跡. 第2卷. 農林水産省 農業環境技術硏究所. pp.610-617.
  15. 小林 浩幸. 2009. 麥類を用いたピングマルチ大豆栽培の抑草メカニズムと抑草のたの麥類の適正生育量. 東北農業硏究センター硏究成果ダイジェスト.