International Journal of Highway Engineering (한국도로학회논문집)

Korean Society of Road Engineers (한국도로학회)
권호 표지

Comparing Laboratory Responses of Engineered Emulsified Asphalt and Foamed Asphalt Mixtures for Cold In-place Recycling Pavement

현장 상온 재생 아스팔트 포장을 위한 고점착 유화 아스팔트 혼합물과 폼드 아스팔트 혼합물의 반응특성 비교

  • Kim, Yong-Joo Thomas (Korean Society of Road Engineers. Senior Researcher. Highway Research Division Korean Institute of Construction Technology) ;
  • Lee, Ho-Sin David (Korean Society of Road Engineers. Associate Professor. Public Policy Center. Civil and Environmental Engineering. University of Iowa)
  • Received : 2009.11.24
  • Accepted : 2010.01.05
  • Published : 2010.03.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Cold in-place recycling (CIR) using emulsified asphalt or foamed asphalt has become a more common practice in rehabilitating the existing asphalt pavement due to its cost effectiveness and the conservation of paving materials. As CIR continues to evolve, the engineered emulsified asphalt was developed to improve the field performances such as coating, raveling, retained stability value and curing time. The main objective of this research is to compare the laboratory responses of the engineered emulsified asphalt (CIR-EE) mixtures against the foamed asphalt (CIR-foam) mixtures using the reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP)materials collected from the CIR project on U.S. 20 Highway in Iowa. Based on the visual observation of laboratory specimens, the engineered emulsified asphalt coated the RAP materials better than the foamed asphalt because the foamed asphalt is to create a mastic mixture structure rather than coating RAP materials. Given the same compaction effort, CIR-EE specimens exhibited lesser density than CIR-foam specimens. Both Marshall stability and indirect tensile strength of CIR-EE specimens were about same as those of CIR-foam specimens. However, Marshall stability and indirect tensile strength of the vacuum-saturated wet specimens of CIR-EE mixtures were higher than those of CIR-foam mixtures. After four hours of curing in the room temperature, the CIR-EE specimens showed less raveling than the CIR-foam specimens. On the basis of test results, it can be concluded that the CIR-EE mixtures is less susceptible to moisture and more raveling resistant than CIR-foam mixtures.

일반적으로 유화 아스팔트와 폼드 아스팔트를 사용한 현장 상온 재생 아스팔트 포장은 노후한 아스팔트 포장을 재생하는데 가장 경제적이며 친환경적인 재활용 공법이다. 최근, 현장 상온 재생 아스팔트 혼합물의 코팅, 라벨링, 잔류안정도, 양생조건을 향상시켜주는 고점착 유화 아스팔트가 개발되었다. 본 연구의 목적은 현장 상온 재생 아스팔트 포장을 위한 고점착 유화 아스팔트 혼합물과 폼드 아스팔트 혼합물의 실내시험에 대한 반응특성을 비교하는 것이다. 고점착 유화 아스팔트 혼합물은 폼드 아스팔트 혼합물과 비교하여 재활용 골재를 균일하게 코팅시켜주는 것으로 육안 관찰되었다. 현장 상온 재생 아스팔트 포장을 위한 고점착 유화 아스팔트 혼합물과 폼드 아스팔트 혼합물의 마샬안정도와 간접인장강도는 유사한 반응을 보여주었다. 하지만 진공으로 포화된 습윤상태의 고점착 유화 아스팔트 혼합물의 마샬안정도와 간접인장강도는 폼드 아스팔트 혼합물보다 우수한 것으로 나타났다. 4시간 양생 후 고점착 유화 아스팔트 혼합물의 라벨링 현상은 폼드 아스팔트 혼합물보다 적게 발생하였다. 본 실내시험에 대한 반응특성으로부터 현장 상온 재생 아스팔트 포장을 위한 고점착 유화 아스팔트 혼합물은 폼드 아스팔트 혼합물보다 우수한 저항성과 라벨링 저항성을 발휘하는 것으로 평가되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. ASTM. (2003). "Standard Test Method for Recovery of Asphalt from Solution by Abson Method." ASTM D 1856-95a, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.
  2. ASTM. (2007). "Standard Test Method for Indirect Tensile (IDT) Strength of Bituminous Mixtures." ASTM D 6931, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA.
  3. AASHTO (2005). "Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity and Density of Hot-Mix Paving Mixtures." AASHTO T 209, American Associate of State Highway and Transportation Offices, Washington D.C.
  4. AASHTO (2001). "Bulk Specific Gravity of Compacted Bituminous Mixtures Using Saturated Surface-Dry Specimens." AASHTO T 166, American Associate of State Highway and Transportation Offices, Washington D.C.
  5. AASHTO (2004). "Resistance to Plastic Flow of Bituminous Mixtures Using Marshall Apparatus." AASHTO T 245, American Associate of State Highway and Transportation Offices, Washington D.C.
  6. Asphalt Recycling and Reclaiming Association (ARRA). (2001). Basic Asphalt Recycling Manual, Annapolis, MD.
  7. Acott, S. M. (1979). "Sand Stabilization Using Foamed Bitumen." Proc., 3rd Conf. on Asphalt Pavements for South Africa, Durban, pp. 155-172.
  8. Bowering, R. H. (1970). "Properties and Behaviors of Foamed Bitumen Mixtures for Road Building." Proc., 5th ARRB Conf., Australian Road Research Board, Canberra, Part 6, pp. 38-57.
  9. Bowering, R. H. (1976). "Foamed Bitumen Production and Application of Mixtures Evaluation and Performance of Pavements." Asph. Paving Technol., Vo. 24, pp. 453-477.
  10. Barela, J. B. (1999). "Cold-in-Place Recycling Survey." Rocky Mountain Asphalt User Producer Group.
  11. Castedo, F. L. H., and Wood, L. E. (1983). "Stabilization with Foamed Asphalt of Aggregates Commonly Used in Low-Volume Roads." Transportation Research Record 898, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D. C., pp. 297-302.
  12. IowaDOT. (2006). "Developmental Specifications for Cold In-place Recycled Asphalt Pavement." DS-01076, Iowa Department of Transportation, Ames, IA.
  13. Lee, D. Y. (1981). "Treating Marginal Aggregates and Soil with Foamed Asphalt." Proc. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, White Bear Lake, Vol. 50, pp. 211-250.
  14. Kim, Y., and Lee, H. (2006). "Development of Mix Design Procedure for Cold In-Place Recycling with Foamed Asphalt." J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 18 (1), pp.166-124.
  15. Kim, Y., Lee, H., and Heitzman, M. (2007). "Validation of New Mix Design Procedure for Cold In-Place Recycling with Foamed Asphalt." J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 19 (11), pp. 1000-1010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:11(1000)
  16. Muthen, K. L. (1999). "Foamed Asphalt Mixes-Mix Design Procedure." Contract Rep. No.CR-98/077, CSIR Transportek, South Africa.
  17. Marquis, B., Peabody, D., and Malick. R. (2003). "Design, Construction and Early Performance of Foamed Asphalt Full Depth Reclaimed (FDR) Pavement in Maine." Proc., TRB 82nd Annual Meeting (CD-Rom), Washington, D.C.
  18. Mohammad, L. N., Abu-Farsakh, M. Y., Wu, Z., and Abadie, C. (2003). "Louisiana Experience with Foamed Recycled Asphalt Pavement Base Materials." Proc., TRB 82nd Annual Meeting (CD-Rom), Washington, D.C.
  19. Ruckel, P. J., Scott, S. M., and Bowering, R. H. (1980). "Foamed-Asphalt Paving Mixtures: Preparation of Design Mixes and Treatment of Test Specimens." Transportation Research Record 911, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., pp. 88-95.
  20. Tia, M., and Wood, L. E. (1983). "Use of Asphalt Emulsion and Foamed Asphalt in Cold-Recycled Asphalt Paving Mixtures." Transportation Research Record 898, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 315-321.
  21. Thomas, T., and Kadrmas, A. (2003). "Performance-Related Testsand Specifications for Cold In-Place Recycling: Lab and Field Experience." Proc., TRB 82nd Annual Meeting (CD-Rom), Washington, D.C.
  22. Van Wijk, A. J. (1984). "Structural Comparison of Two Cold Recycled Pavement Layers." Transportation Research Record 954, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 70-77.
  23. Wilson, B. (2001). "New Cold In-Place Recycling Claims to Strengthen Asphalt Pavement." Roads & Bridges, Vol. 39, IL.