Economic and Environmental Geology (자원환경지질)

The Korean Society of Economic and Environmental Geology (대한자원환경지질학회)
권호 표지

Comparison of Soil Washing for Heavy Metal Contaminated Shooting Range Using Various Extracts

다양한 추출용매를 이용한 중금속 오염 사격장 토양세척 비교

  • Lee, Jun-Ho (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) ;
  • Park, Kap-Song (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
  • 이준호 (한국외국어대학교 환경학과) ;
  • 박갑성 (한국외국어대학교 환경학과)
  • Received : 2010.03.04
  • Accepted : 2010.04.19
  • Published : 2010.04.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In order to remediate heavy metal contaminated Nong island, Maehyang-ri shooting range soils through the batch reactor scale washing were evaluated. The experiment texture soil of N3 in the Nong island at north side incline was (g)mS containing 12.9% gravel, 47.0% sand, 35.1% silt and 5.0% clay. And the N3 soil area was contaminated with Cd($22.5\pm1.9$ ppm), Cu($35.5\pm4.0$ ppm), Pb($1,279.0\pm5.1$ ppm) and Zn($403.4\pm9.8$ ppm). The EDTA(ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid, $C_{10}H_{16}N_2O_8$) in the N3 soil was observed as most effective extractants among the 5 extractants(citric acid, EDTA, phosphoric acid, potassium phosphate and oxalic acid) tested. And chemical partitioning of heavy metals after washing N3 soil with EDTA was evaluated. Removal efficiency of residual fractions was higher than that of non-residual fractions. To choose EDTA extractant which is the most effective in soil washing technology using batch reactor process cleaning Pb and Zn contaminated sits; Pb and Zn removal rates were investigated 92.4%, 94.0% removal(1,000 mM, soil:solution=5, $20^{\circ}C$, 24 hour shaking, pH=2, 200 RPM), respectively. The results of the batch test showed that the removal efficiency curve was logarithmic in soil was removal. Thus, EDTA washing process can be applied to remediate the Pb and Zn contaminated soil used in this study.

사격지로 이용되었던 매향리 농섬 및 곡섬 시료 토양 및 퇴적물의 회분식 반응기 이용 중금속 추출 정화 실험을 수행하였다. 농섬 북쪽방면 사면의 N3 토양은 자갈 12.9%, 모래 47.0%, 실트 35.1%, 점토 5.0%가 함유된 약역머드 사질((g)mS)이었다. 그리고 N3 토양의 중금속 함유량은 Cd $22.5\pm1.9$ ppm, Cu $35.5\pm4.0$ ppm, Pb $1,279.0\pm5.1$ ppm 그리고 Zn $403.4\pm9.8$ppm이였다. 이 N3 토양에 5 종류 추출용매(citric acid, EDTA, phosphoric acid, potassium phosphate and oxalic acid)를 사용하여 추출한 결과 EDTA(ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, $C_{10}H_{16}N_2O_8$)가 가장 좋은 추출효율을 가져왔다. 이는 N3 토양의 EDTA, oxalic acid 추출전 후 잔류성 fraction 부분이 형태가 파괴됨으로써 상당수가 추출되거나 좀 더 이동이 쉬운 상태로 진화되며 이에 따라 상대적으로 비잔류성 non-fracton 부분인 철/망간 산화물 형태, 유기물/황화물 형태, 이온교환성 형태, 탄산염으로 증가된다는 것을 보였다. 또한 EDTA 추출제를 사용하여 추출제 농섬 1,000 mM, soil:solution 비율 5, 실험 온도 $20^{\circ}C$, shaking 시간 24 hr, pH 2 그리고 200 RPM 조건의 회분식 반응기를 이용한 추출 결과 N3 토양은 Pb과 Zn이 초기농도 대비 각각 92.4%, 94.0% 추출제거되었다. 이러한 결과는 EDTA 추출제가 중금속으로 오염된 농섬 및 곡섬 토양은 회분식 반응기 이용 추출 실험에서 Pb, Zn가 효율적으로 제거 될 수 있음을 의미하나 특정 조건에서만 제거효율이 높은 logarithmic 함수 값을 보였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국외국어대학교

References

  1. American Public Health Association. (1998) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Washington, D.C, 15p.
  2. Bae. H.H., Kim. M.K., Park. S.H. and Chang. Y.Y. (2008) Distribution and Behavior of Mixed Contaminants, Explosives and Heavy Metals, at a Small Scale Military Shooting Range. J. Korean Soc. on Water Quality, v.24, p.523-532. (in Korean)
  3. Bhattacharya, P., Arun, B.M., Gunnar, J. and Sune, N. (2002) Metal contamination at a wood preservation site: characterisation and experimental studies on remediation. Sci. Total Environ., v.290, p.165-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)01073-7
  4. Bourg, A.C.M. (1983) Modelisation du Comportment Des Metaux Traces a I'interface Soilde Liquide Dans Les Systemes Aquatiques. Document BRGM, Orleans, France (in French), v.62, p.120-125.
  5. Boyle, J.R., Voigt, G.K. and Sawhney, B.L. (1974) Chemical weathering of biotite by organic acids. J. Soil Sci., v.117, p.42-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-197401000-00006
  6. Carter, M.R. (1993) Soil sampling and methods of analysis, Canadian Society of Soil. Science, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, p.5-19.
  7. Chlopecka, A., Bacon, J.R., Wilson, M.K. and Kay, J. (1996) Forms of Cadmium, Lead, and Zinc in Contaminated Soils from Southwest Poland. J. Environ. Quality, v.25, p.69-79.
  8. Cho, S.I. and Kim H.S. (2008) Effects of HCl and EDTA on Soil Washing to Remediate Lead-contaminated Soil in a Firing Range. J. Korean Soc. Soil and Ground Water Environ., v.13, p.60-66. (in Korean)
  9. Elliott, H.A., Liberati, M.R. and Huang, C.P. (1986) Competitive adsorption of heavy metals by soils. J. Environ. Quality, v.15, p.214-219.
  10. Evanko, C.R. and Dzombak, D.A. (1997) Technology Evaluation Report: Remediation of Metals-contaminated Soils and Groundwater. Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center, p.1-10.
  11. Folk, R.L. (1968) Petrology of sedimentary rocks, The university of Texas HEMPHILL'S draver M. university station Austin, Texas, 170p.
  12. Freeman, H.M. and Harris, E.F. (1995) Soil Washing Treatment, Hazardous Waste Remediation: Innovative Treatment Technologies, H. M. Freeman and E. F. Harris (eds.), Technomic Publishing Company, Inc, pp.103-112.
  13. Harada, Y. and Inoko, A. (1980) The measurement of the cation-exchange capacity of composts for the estimation of the degree of maturity. Japan. Soc. Soil Sci. Plant Nutrition, v.26, p.127-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.1980.10433219
  14. Heil, D.M., Samani, A.T. and Hanson, A.T. (1999) Remediation of lead contaminated soil by EDTA(I. Batch and Column Studies). Water, Air, & Soil Pollu., v.113, p.77-95. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005032504487
  15. Jackson, M.L. (1958) Soil Chemical Analysis., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, p.570-595.
  16. Kim, H.S. and Cho, S.I. (2008) Effects of HCl and EDTA on Soil Washing to Remediate Lead-contaminated Soil in a Firing Range. J. Korean Soc. Soil and Ground Water Environ., v.13, p.60-66. (in Korean)
  17. Kim, J.D. (2008) Extraction Characteristics of Heavy Metals for Soil Washing of Mine Tailings-contaminated Soil according to Particle Size Distribution. J. Korean Industrial and Engineering Chem., v.19, p.98-104. (in Korean)
  18. Li, Z. and Shuman, L.M. (1996) Heavy metal movement in metal-contaminated soil profiles. Soil Sci., v.161, p.656-666. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-199610000-00003
  19. Nriagu, J.O. and Pacyna, J.M. (1988) Quantitative assessment of worldwide contamination of air, water and soils by trace metals. Nature, v.333, p.134-139. https://doi.org/10.1038/333134a0
  20. Prosun, B., Arun, B.M., Jacks, G. and Noedqvist, S. (2002) Metal contamination at a wood preservation site: characterisation and experimental studies on remediation, Sci. Total Environ., v.290, p.165-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)01073-7
  21. Sparks, D.L. (1995) Environmental soil chemistry, Acadamic Press, Inc. p.245-264.
  22. Stevenson, F.J. (1992) Humus Chemistry, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., p.1-23.
  23. Tessier, A., Campbell, P.G.C. and Bisson, M. (1979) Sequetial extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Analytical Chemistry, v.51, p.844-850. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac50043a017
  24. Tessier, A., Campbell, P.G.C. and Carignan, R. (1985) Influence du pH surla speciation et la biodisponibilite des metaux. Association Générale Des Hygiénistes et Techniciens Municipaux, v.2, p.69-73.
  25. US EPA. (1997) Report: Recent Developments for In Situ Treatment of Metal Contaminated Soils., U.S. Envirionmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Technology Innovation Office, Washington, D.C. draft, p.33-39.