Effects of Rainfall Events on Soil in Orchard Field under Herbicide Treatment. 2. Characteristics of Runoff and Soil Erosion

제초제 처리 과수원 포장에서 강우 사상의 효과. 2. 유거와 토양침식의 변화

  • Chung, Doug-Young (Department of Bioenvironmental Chemistry College of Agriculture and Life Science Chungnam National Univ.) ;
  • Park, Mi-Suk (Department of Bioenvironmental Chemistry, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Kyu-Seung (Department of Bioenvironmental Chemistry, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Ho (Department of Bioenvironmental Chemistry, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Chonbuk National University)
  • 정덕영 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 생물환경화학과) ;
  • 박미숙 (전북대학교 농업생명과학대학 생물환경화학과) ;
  • 이규승 (전북대학교 농업생명과학대학 생물환경화학과) ;
  • 이진호 (전북대학교 농업생명과학대학 생물환경화학과)
  • Received : 2010.01.05
  • Accepted : 2010.02.11
  • Published : 2010.02.28

Abstract

Changes in runoff and soil erosion at slightly hilly erosive plots with pear trees over a three-year period were monitored under two distinct types of weed treatment by herbides : (1) pre-emergence herbicide with glyphosate; (2) post-emergence herbicide with paraquat. The numbers of rainfall events from June to Nov for three years of experimental periods were approximately 50 times in the plots having 5.5%to 10.2%slope at an altitude of 125 m. The steady-state infiltration rate was generally increased in the bare plot from which all weeds were removed while it was decreased in the herbicide treated plots and control. The runoffs from the control plot during the experimental periods were always less than those from plots of the herbicide-treated and the bare. The runoff under the same rainfall intensity was decreased in the order of bare, glyphosate, paraquat, and control. This results indicated that the removal time of weed by the different types of herbicides might influenced the runoff rate. For the first two years of the experimental periods, loss of fine fraction was much greater than that of coarse fraction while soil loss was correlated neither with total rainfall nor amount of runoff. The soil erosion rate under the same rainfall intensity was increased in the order of control, glyphosate, paraquat, and bare plot. However, there were not much differences in the soil loss for all plots under a relatively lower rainfall intensity less than 30 mm $day^{-1}$, resulting in rainfall intensity was important factor on soil erosion.

충남 공주 팔봉산 남쪽 측면에 위치한 3년간 배나무가 식재된 구릉성 침식포장에서 유거와 침식의 변화를 (1)Glyphosate 처리 (2) paraquat 처리의 두 가지 서로 다른 제초관리 형태하에서 조사하였다. 조사지의 경사도는 5.5% ~ 10.2%, 고도 125 m이며 조사면적은 896 $m^2$ ($28m{\times}32m$)였다. 2006년에서 2008년 사이 총강우사상은 각각 47, 52, 52회였다. 전체 강우사상 중 일 강우량이 20 mm보다 적은 날은 전체 강우일수의 약 65%를 차지하였다. 평형상태에서 침투율은 지표면의 잡초가 모두 제거된 나지에서 일반적으로 증가하였으며, 제초제처리구와 대조구에서는 감소하였다. 모든 대조구에서 유거는 제초제처리구와 나지구보다 항시 낮았다. 동일 강우강도에서 유거는 대조구, glyposate 처리구, paraquat 처리구 glyposate-처리 나지구 순으로 증가하였다. 높은 강우강도하에서 처리구가간 유거의 차이는 1년차에서 가장 높았다. 조사 기간 3년간 토양손실은 각각 달랐다. 미세입자 손실이 조립질보다 높았으나 토양손실은 유거나 총강우량과 상관성은 없는 것으로 조사되었다. 동일 강우강도하에서 토양침식율은 대조구, glyposate 처리구, paraquat 처리구 glyposate-처리 나지구 순으로 증가하였다. 상대적으로 30 mm 이하의 강우강도하에서는 조사구간 제초제 처리 여부 상관성이 거의 없었다. 이는 토양침식은 강우강도에 의존한다는 것을 의미한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chung, D.Y., P.J. Kim, and M.S. Park. 2010. Effects of Rainfall Events on Soil in Orchard Field under Herbicide Treatment. 1. Changes in soil physical and chemical properties. Submitted to KSSSF in 2010.
  2. Fu, B. L. Chen, K. Ma, H. Zhou, and J. Wang. 2000. References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article. CATENA Volume 39.1. Pages 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(99)00084-3
  3. Gomez, J. A., J. V. Giraldez, and E. Fereres. 2001. Analysis of Infiltration and Runoff in an Olive Orchard under No-Till. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65:291-299. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.652291x
  4. Huang, Q. 1998. Study on the erosion of different ecological types of red soil in hilly land. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi. 10(3):7-12.
  5. Huang, Q. T. Peng. and K. Wang 2002. Study on resources protection of water and soil and development technology in harmony in the hillside field. Chinese Journal of Ecoagriculture, 10(3):98-101.
  6. Kim, J. H., K. T. Kim, and G. B. Yeon. 2003. Analysis of Soil Erosion Hazard zone using GIS. Journal of Korea Association of Geographic Information Studies. Vol. 6.2. pp.22-32.
  7. Kim, K. T., J. H. Kim, J. S. Park, and Y. S. Choi. 2004. Analysis of soil erosion hazard zone in Farmland. http://proceedings.esri.com/library/userconf/proc05/papers/pap1834.pdf.
  8. Mitchem, W. E. 2009. Weed management consideration for peach orchards http://www.ent.uga.edu/peach/peachhbk/pdf/weedmanagement.pdf.
  9. Poesen, J., and H. Lavee. 1994. Rock fragments in topsoils: significance and processes. CATENA 23, 1-28. doi: 10.1016/0341-8162(94)90050-7.
  10. Sauer, T. J., and S. D. Logsdon. 2002. Hydraulic and physical properties of stony soils in a small watershed. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66, 1947-1956. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.1947
  11. Shui, J. G, B. Liao, and Au C Jeff. 1989. Effects of different uses of red soil slopes on soil and water loss. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 3(1):84-90.
  12. Shui, J. G. B. Liao, A C. Jeff, Q. C. Zhou, and Jean L. Allard. 2004. Effects of different native vegetation management measures on red soil erosion in hilly orchards. ISCO 2004-13th International Soil Conservation Organisation Conference, Brisbane, July 2004.