Effect of Pig Slurry Fertigation on Soil Chemical Properties and Yield of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)

돈분 액비 관비가 토마토의 수량 및 토양화학성에 미치는 영향

  • Park, Jin-Myeon (Horticultural & Herbal Crop Environment Division, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science) ;
  • Lim, Tae-Jun (Horticultural & Herbal Crop Environment Division, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science) ;
  • Kang, Seok-Boem (Horticultural & Herbal Crop Environment Division, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science) ;
  • Lee, In-Bok (Planning and Coordination Division, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science) ;
  • Kang, Yun-Im (Protected Horticulture Research Station, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science)
  • 박진면 (농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 원예특작환경과) ;
  • 임태준 (농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 원예특작환경과) ;
  • 강석범 (농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 원예특작환경과) ;
  • 이인복 (농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 기획조정과) ;
  • 강윤임 (농촌진흥청 국립원예특작과학원 시설원예시험장)
  • Received : 2010.05.24
  • Accepted : 2010.07.09
  • Published : 2010.10.30

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate fertigation effects of pig slurry (PS) and chemical fertilizer (CF) in tomato by analyzing the growth and yield, nutrient content and uptake, nutrient use efficiency, and soil characteristics in greenhouse cultivation. The treatments compared were; no-fertilizer, two different levels of PS (26 mg $L^{-1}$ and 52 mg $L^{-1}$), and a control treatment of chemical fertilizer. There was no significant difference in growth and yield between PS and CF treatments. however, yield reduction was observed in PS 26 mg $L^{-1}$ treatment. The N-utilization efficiency in CF treatment was similar to that of PS 52 mg $L^{-1}$ treatment. Nutrient utilization efficiency decreased in order of potassium (K), nitrogen (N), phosphate (P) with 29.2~43.3% in K, 15.8~36.7% in N, and 3.0~6.3% in P. In soil chemical characteristics, soil pH in PS treatment was higher than in CF treatment. In contrast, nitrate content in soil was higher in CF treatment than in PS treatment. The content of exchangeable K in soil was higher in PS and CF 52 mg $L^{-1}$ treatments. There was no significant difference in exchangeable Ca and Mg among those treatments. Therefore, it can be concluded that chemical fertilizers can be substituted by PS based on soil chemical analysis in tomato fertigation culture.

시설 하우스 토마토재배에서 돈분뇨 액비와 화학비료의 관비 처리 효과를 알아보기 위하여 무비, 질소 기준으로 돈분뇨 액비 26 mg $L^{-1}$, 52 mg $L^{-1}$ 및 화학비료 52 mg $L^{-1}$ 4처리를 하여 토마토 수량, 생육, 무기성분함량, 양분흡수량, 양분이용률 및 토양 화학성에 미치는 영향을 알아보았다. 돈분뇨 액비와 화학비료 관비 처리는 수량과 생육에 차이가 없었으며 돈분뇨 액비 26 mg $L^{-1}$ 처리에서 수량이 감소하는 경향을 보였다. 돈분뇨 액비와 화학비료 처리에 비해 잎과 뿌리의 질소와 칼륨함량은 무비에서 낮았으나 뿌리와 줄기의 인산함량은 무비에서 높았다. 칼슘함량은 잎에서 처리간에 차이가 없었으나 뿌리와 줄기는 돈분뇨 액비 52 mg $L^{-1}$ 처리가 높았고 과실내 칼슘함량은 화학비료 52 mg $L^{-1}$ 처리가 낮았다. 양분 이용률은 질소 15.8~6.7%, 인산은 3.0~6.3%, 칼륨은 29.2~43.3%로 칼륨, 질소, 인산 순으로 낮았다. 토양 화학성 중 pH는 돈분뇨 액비 처리가 화학비료 처리보다 높았고 질산태 질소함량은 화학비료 처리가 돈분뇨 액비 처리보다 증가하였다. 치환성 칼륨함 량은 돈분뇨 액비와 화학비료 52 mg $L^{-1}$ 처리구가 높았으며 칼슘과 마그네슘은 처리간에 차이가 없었다. 결과적으로 토마토 관비 재배에서 토양 검정에 의한 돈분뇨 액비 시용은 화학비료 질소와 칼리를 대체하여 이용할 수 있을 것으로 판단되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bonmati, A. and X. Flotats. 2003. Air stripping of ammonia from pig slurry characterization and feasibility as pre- or post-treatment to mesophilic anaerobic digestion. Waste Management 23:261-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00144-7
  2. Choi, J.K. 2008. Effect of liquid pig manure on horticultural crop and soil environment. 2007 Annual Report on Natural Cycle Agricultural Research. RDA. Natural Recycle Agricultural Research Project Team. p. 95-103.
  3. Clifford, WR., L.B. James, and H.D. Stensel. 1992. Design and retrofit of wastewater treatment plants for biological nutrient removal. Water Quality Management Library 5:1-23.
  4. Hong, S.D. 1998. Fertilizer recommendation based on soil testing for tomato in plastic film house. J. Korea Soc. Soil Sci. Fert. 31:350-358.
  5. Hwang, S.W., J.K. Sung, B.K. Kang, C.S. Lee, S.G. Yun, T.W. Kim, and K.C. Eom. 2004. Polyamine biosynthesis in red pepper and chinese cabbage by the application of liquid pig manure. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 37:171-176.
  6. Kang, B.G., H.J. Kim, G.J. Lee, and S.G. Park. 2004. Determination of the optimum application rate of pig slurry for red pepper cultivation. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 37:388-395.
  7. Kang, S.S. and S.D. Hong. 2004. Estimation of optimum application rate of nitrogen fertilizer based on soil nitrate contraction for tomato cultivation in plastic film house. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 37:74-82.
  8. Lee, C.H., K.Y. Shin, J.T. Lee, G.J. Lee, and J.H. Ahn. 2003. Determination of nitrogen application level for Chinese cabbage with application of poultry manure compost in highland. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 36:280-289.
  9. Lee, I.B., J.H. Lim, and J.M. Park. 2007. Effect of reduced nitrogen fertigation rates on growth and yield of tomato. Kor. J. Environ. Agr. 26:306-312. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2007.26.4.306
  10. Lee, J.T., I.J. Ha, H.D. Kim, J.S. Moon, W.I. Kim, and W.D. Song. 2006a. Effect of liquid pig manure on growth, nutrient uptake of onion, and chemical properties in soil. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 24:148-156.
  11. Lee, I.B., J.M. Park, J.H. Lim, and K.S. Hwang. 2006b. Growth and yield response of the following tomato crop according to incorporation of green manure into soil. Kor. J. Environ. Agr. 25:346-351. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2006.25.4.346
  12. Liao, P.H., A. Chen, and K.V. Lo. 1995. Removal of nitrogen from swine manure water by ammonia stripping. Bioresource. Technol. 54:17-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(95)00105-0
  13. Lim, T.J., I.B. Lee, S.B. Kang, J.M. Park, and S.D. Hong. 2009a. Effects of continual pre-plant application of pig slurry on soil mineral nutrients and yield of chinese cabbage. Kor. J. Environ. Agr. 28:227-232. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2009.28.3.227
  14. Lim, T.J., S.D. Hong, S.B. Kang, and J.M. Park. 2009b. Evaluation of preplant optimum application rates of pig slurry composting biofiltration for chinese cabbage. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 27:572-577.
  15. Lim, T.J., S.D. Hong, S.H. Kim, and J.M. Park. 2008. Evaluation of yield and quality from red pepper for application rates of pig slurry composting biofiltration. Kor. J. Environ. Agr. 27:171-177. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2008.27.2.171
  16. MAF. 2007. Statistical research annual report of agriculture and forestry. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Seoul. Korea.
  17. Murayama, S., N. Kibo, M. Komada, K. Baba, and A. Tsumura. 2001. Water quality, particularly of trihalomethane formation potential of ground water of articultural area of humic volcanic ash soil on Shirash Plateau where livestock wastes have been applied as land management. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 72:764-774.
  18. Rural Development Adminstration (RDA). 2000. Methods of soil and plant analysis. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Suwon, Korea.
  19. Rural Development Adminstration (RDA). 2006. Manual of appling liquid fertilizer with livestock manure. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Suwon, Korea.
  20. Rural Development Adminstration (RDA). 2009a. Improvement of the swine slurry treatment and land application technology for recycling, p. 1-50., In: Kim, J.H., U.S. Jeong, J.G. Choi, J.H. Gwak, G.H. Jeong, M.S. Jeong, M.S. Han, Y.S. Song, T.H. Yun., C. Kim. (eds.) Improvement of the swine slurry treatment system by SCB process. 2009 Reort of National Joint Agricultural Research Project of RDA, Suwon, Korea.
  21. Rural Development Adminstration (RDA). 2009b. Improvement of the swine slurry treatment and land application technology for recycling, p. 110-134. In: Park, J.M., Y.I. Kang, I.B. Lee, T.J. Lim, J.K. Park, S.B. Kang. (eds.). Development of cultivation technology for appliance in fruit tree and greenhouse vegetation of slurry composting biofilatration. 2009 Report of National Joint Agricultural Research Project of RDA, Suwon, Korea.
  22. Yadav, R.L., B.S. Dwivede, K. Prasad, and P.S, Pandey. 2000. Yield trends and changes in soil organic-C and available NPK in a long-term rice-wheat system under integrated use of manure and fertilizers. Field Crop Res. 68:219-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00126-X