Journal of Environmental Science International (한국환경과학회지)

The Korean Environmental Sciences Society (한국환경과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of Land Use and Meteorological Factors for Evapotranspiration Estimation in the Coastal Urban Area

해안도시 지역에서 증발산량 산정에 토지이용도와 기상인자의 영향성

  • Yang, Sung-Il (Department of Environmental Geosciences, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Kang, Dong-Hwan (Geo-Sciences Institute, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Kwon, Byung-Hyuk (Department of Environmental Atmospheric Sciences, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Kim, Byung-Woo (K-water Institute, Korea Water Resources Corporation)
  • 양성일 (부경대학교 환경지질과학과) ;
  • 강동환 (부경대학교 지구과학연구소) ;
  • 권병혁 (부경대학교 환경대기과학과) ;
  • 김병우 (한국수자원공사 K-water연구원)
  • Received : 2009.06.01
  • Accepted : 2009.12.31
  • Published : 2010.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Actual evapotranspiration (AET) in the Suyeong-gu was estimated and correlations between AET and meteorological factors were analyzed. The study area was Suyeong-gu lay at the east longitude $129^{\circ}$ 05' 40" ~ 129$^{\circ}$ 08' 08" and north latitude $35^{\circ}$ 07' 59" ~ $35^{\circ}$ 11' 01". The Kumryun mountain, the Bae mountain, the Suyeong river and the Suyeong bay are located on west, north, northeaster and south side in the study area, respectively. AET was estimated using precipitation (P), potential evapotranspiration (PET) and plant-available water coefficient. Meteorological factors to estimate PET were air temperature, dewpoint temperature, atmospheric pressure, duration of sunshine and mean wind speed (MWS). PET and AET were estimated by a method of Allen et al. (1998) and Zhang et al. (2001), respectively. PET was the highest value (564.45 mm/yr) in 2002 year, while it was the lowest value (449.95 mm/yr) in 2003 year. AET was estimated highest value (554.14 mm/yr) in 2002 year and lowest value (427.91 mm/yr) in 2003 year. Variations of PET and AET were similar. The linear regression function of AET as PET using monthly data was AET=0.87$\times$PET+3.52 and coefficient of determination was high, 0.75. In order to analyze relationship between the evapotranspiration and meteorological factors, correlation analysis using monthly data were accomplished. Correlation coefficient of AET-PET was 0.96 high, but they of AET-P and PET-P were very low. Correlation coefficients of AET-MWS and PET-MWS were 0.67 and 0.73, respectively. Thus, correlation between evapotranspiration and MWS was the highest among meteorological factors in Suyong-gu. This means that meteorological factor to powerfully effect for the variation of evapotranspiration was MWS. The linear regression function of AET as MWS was AET=84.73$\times$MWS+223.05 and coefficient of determination was 0.54. The linear regression function of PET as MWS was PET=83.83$\times$MWS+203.62 and coefficient of determination was 0.45.

Keywords

References

  1. 김해동, 임진욱, 이순환, 2006, 위성 자료를 이용한 대구광역시의 상대적 증발산 효율 분포, 한국지구과학회, 27(6), 677-686.
  2. 수영구청, 2008, 토지 및 기후, 통계연보, 수영구청.
  3. 안중기, 이용두, 황종환, 2006, 격자기반의 토양 물수지방법에 의한 지하수함양의 공간분포 추정, 한국지하수토양환경학회, 11(1), 65-76.
  4. 안충현, 오성남, 박종현, 1995, RS/GIS기법을 이용한 광역증발산량의 추정, 대한원격탐사학회, 11(1), 65-80.
  5. 임창수, 2007, 도시화에 따른 수문기후변화 II (도시화가 기준 증발산량에 미치는 영향), 한국수자원학회, 40(7), 571-583. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2007.40.7.571
  6. 임창수, 채효석, 2007, 도시화에 따른 수문기후변화 I (연물수지 변화 분석), 한국수자원학회, 40(7), 555-570.
  7. Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., Smith, M., 1998, Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirments, FAO irrigation and dirainage pa-per 56, FAO, ISBN 92-5-104219-5.
  8. Arya, S. P., 2001, Introduction to Micrometeorology, Academic Press, 420.
  9. Blaney, H. F., Criddle, W. D., 1950, Determining water requirements in irrigated areas from climatological and irrigation data, USDA(SCS) TP-96, 48.
  10. Domenico, P. A., Schwartz, F. W., 1998, Physical and Chemical Hydrogelogy, 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 506.
  11. Fitts, C. R., 2002, Groundwater science, Academic press, 450.
  12. Gong, L., Xu, C. Y., Chen, D., Halldin, S., Chen, Y. D., 2006, Sensitivity of the Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration to key climatic variables in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) basin, J. of Hydrology, 329, 620-629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.03.027
  13. Goyal, R. K., 2004, Sensitivity of evapotranspiration to global warming: a case study of arid zone of Rajasthan (India), Agricultural Water Management, 69, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.03.014
  14. Hamon, W. R., 1963, Computation of Direct Runoff Amounts From Storm Rainfall, Int. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. Pub., 63, 52-62.
  15. Hargreaves, G. H., Samani, Z. A, 1985, Reference Crop Evapotranspiration From Temperature, Applied Engrg. in Agric., 1(2), 96-99. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.26773
  16. Lu, J., Sun, G., McNulty, S. G., Amatya, D. M., 2005, A comparison of six potential evapotranspiration methods for regional use in the southeastern United States, J. of the American Water Resources Association, 41(3), 621-633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03759.x
  17. Makkink, G. F., 1957, Testing the Penman Formula by Means of Lysimeters, J. Inst. of Water Eng., 11, 277-288.
  18. Monteith, J. L., 1965, Evaporation and environment, in Fogg, G. E. (ed.), symposium of the Society for Experimnetal Biology, The State and Movement of Water in Living Organic, 19, Academic Press, Inc., NY, 205-234.
  19. Penman, H. L., 1948, Natural evapotranspiration from open water, bare soil, and grass, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 193, 120-145. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1948.0037
  20. Priestley, C. H. B., Taylor, R. J., 1972, On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters, Monthly Weather Review, 100, 81-82. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0081:OTAOSH>2.3.CO;2
  21. Singh, V. P., Xu, C. Y., 1997, Sensitivity of mass transfer-based evaporation equations to errors in daily and monthly input data, Hydrological Processes, 11, 1465-1473. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199709)11:11<1465::AID-HYP452>3.0.CO;2-X
  22. Thornthwaite, C. W., 1944, Report of the committee on transpiration and evaporation, Am. Geophy. Union Trans., 25, 683-693. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR025i005p00683
  23. Todd, D. K., Mays, L. W., 2005, Groundwater Hydrology, 3rd Ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 636.
  24. Turc, L., 1961, Evaluation de besoins en eau d'irrigation, ET potentielle, Ann. Agron., 12, 13-49.
  25. Zhang, L., Dawes, W. R., Walker, G. R., 1999, Prediction the effect of vegetation changes on catchment average water balance, Technical Report, 99/12, Coop. Res. Cent. for Catch. Hydrol., Canberra, ACT.
  26. Zhang, L., Dawes, W. R., Walker, G. R., 2001, Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale, Water Resour. Res., 37(3), 701-708. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900325