Clinical Experience of Buccal Fat Pad Pedicled Flap for Denuded Area in Palatoplasty

입천장성형술 시 발생한 골 노출부의 피복을 위한 협지방대 유경피판의 경험

  • Kim, Chee-Sun (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Ajou University) ;
  • Park, Myong-Chul (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Ajou University) ;
  • Park, Dong-Ha (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Ajou University)
  • 김치선 (아주대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 박명철 (아주대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 박동하 (아주대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2009.09.29
  • Accepted : 2009.11.17
  • Published : 2010.01.10

Abstract

Purpose: The primary goal of palatoplasty is to enable normal speech with harmonious growth of face. Some children who had palatoplasty display typical findings of transverse maxillary deficiency requiring orthodontic widening of the maxilla. Levi (2009) described a cleft palate repair coupled with pedicled buccal fat pad flaps to cover bone exposed areas of the hard palate. Hence we report clinical experiences of cleft palate repair using pedicled buccal fat pad flap. Methods: Four Veau class II and a Veau class I cleft palate patients underwent palatoplasty with buccal fat pad flap by single surgeon from April 2009 to August 2009. Two patients received 2-flap palatoplasty and three patients 1-flap palatoplasty, respectively. After the cleft palate repair, sharp mosquito scissors was placed in the superior buccal sulcus just lateral to the maxillary tuberosity and inserted directly through the mucosa resulting in buccal fat pad extrusion. The elevated flap was moved to cover mucoperiosteal defect in hard palatal area. Results: Five patients underwent primary palatoplasty using buccal fat pad flap. Flap harvest and inset took on average 9 minutes per flap. Mucosal epithelization took 18 days on average. No patients had complications related to the buccal fat pad flap. Conclusion: Buccal fat pad pedicled flap has significant potential to function as an added vascularized tissue layer in cleft palate repair and we can expect better growth of maxilla with this method although longer duration of follow-up was unavailable.

Keywords

References

  1. Mathes SJ, Hentz VR: Plastic surgery, 2nd ed., Philadelphia, Elsevier Inc., 2006, Vol. 4, p 255
  2. Dingman RO, Argenta LC: The correction of cleft palate with primary veloplasty and delayed repair of the hard palate. Clin Plast Surg 12: 667, 1985
  3. Rohrich RJ, Byrd HS: Optimal timing cleft palate closure, speech, facial growth, and healing considerations. Clin Plast Surg 17: 27, 1990
  4. Kang JS: Plastic surgery, 3rd ed. Seoul, Gunza, 2004, p 2398
  5. Levi B, Kasten SJ, Buchman SR: Utilization of the buccal fat pad flap for congenital cleft palate repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 123: 1018, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318199f80f
  6. Kang JS: Plastic surgery, 3rd de. Seoul, Gunza, 2004, p 2399
  7. Clark JM, Saffold SH, Israel JM: Decellulized dermal grafting in cleft palate repair. Arch Facial Plast Surg 5: 40, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.5.1.40
  8. Zhang HM, Yan YP, Qi KM, Wang JQ, Liu ZF: Anatomical structure of the buccal fat pad and its clinical adaptations. Plast Reconstr Surg 109: 2509, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200206000-00052
  9. Dean A, Alamillos F, Garcia-Lopez A, Sanchez J, Penalba M: The buccal fat pad flap in oral reconstruction. Head Neck 23: 383, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.1048
  10. Hudson JW, Anderson JG, Russel RM Jr, Aderson N, Chanbers K: Use of pedicled fat pad graft as an adjunct in the reconstruction of palatal cleft defects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 80: 24, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(95)80011-5