Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A COMPARISON OF THE SHAPING ABILITY OF FOUR ROTARY NICKEL-TITANIUM FILES IN SIMULATED ROOT CANALS

엔진구동형 NiTi 파일의 근관성형효과 비교

  • Kim, Bo-Hye (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate of Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Kyoung-Kyu (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate of Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Park, Sang-Hyuk (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate of Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Gi-Woon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Division of Dentistry, Graduate of Kyung Hee University)
  • 김보혜 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 최경규 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박상혁 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 최기운 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보존학교실)
  • Received : 2009.10.14
  • Accepted : 2010.03.10
  • Published : 2010.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the root canal shaping ability of 4 rotary NiTi instruments in simulated root canals. For the preparation of thirty two curved root canals, Mtwo instruments using "single length"technique, and Profile, ProTaper Universal, and K3 using crown-down technique (N = 8) were used. All canal samples were prepared by reaching an apical canal size of #30. Pre- and post-instrumentation digital images were recorded and an assessment of canal shape was determined using a computer image analysis program SigmaScan Pro (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). The changes of the dimension of inner walls of canals, (2) the changes of the dimension of outer walls of canals, and (3) the centering ratio were measured at 7 measuring points, and then data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Duncan's test. The results were as below; 1. The root canal shaping ability of Profile was significantly faster than that of other rotary NiTi instruments (p < 0.05). 2. The deformation and fracture of all instruments used for this study were not experienced. 3. In the degree of changes of the dimension of inner walls of canals, Profile demonstrated the lowest changes of the dimension of inner walls of canals except at the measuring points of the 1 and 2 mm (p < 0.05). However, the ProTaper Universal showed the highest changes of the dimension of inner walls of canals at all measuring points (p < 0.05). 4. In the degree of changes of the dimension of outer walls of canals, Mtwo demonstrated the lowest changse of the dimension of outer walls of canals except at the measuring point of the 1 mm (p < 0.05). However, Profile exhibited the highest changes of the dimension of outer walls of canals at the measuring points of 3 and 4 mm and ProTaper Universal and K3 showed the largest changes of the dimension of outer walls of canals at the measuring points of 1, 2, 6, and 7 mm (p < 0.05). 5. In degree of centering ratio, Profile demonstrated the least centering ratio comparing with the centering ratio shown by other NiTi instruments at the measuring points of 1, 4, 5, and 6 mm. Results suggest that in the coronal part of canal preparation, active cutting files such as ProTaper Universal may efficiently flare the canal orifice and form a better taper, and in the apical part of the canal, files which have a better centering ability such as Profile may maintain the original canal curvature and reduce the shaping time.

이 연구의 목적은 4가지 엔진구동형 NiTi 기구의 근관성형력을 비교하는 것이다. 32개의 투명레진모형을 사용하여 파일의 단면도가 S자 형태이고 "single length"방법으로 근관성형을 시행하는 Mtwo와 crown-down 방법으로 근관성형을 하는 Profile, ProTaper Universal 및 K3로 근관성형을 하였다 (n = 8). 모든 근관은 한사람의 술자가 근단공 크기가 #30이 될 때까지 성형하였다. 기구 사용 전과 후 근관 모양을 디지털 영상을 기록하였고, 컴퓨터 영상 분석 프로그램(Expression Scanner와 Adobe Photoshop CS)으로 평가하였다. 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 근첨으로부터 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 mm 떨어진 부위의 내측과 외측으로 삭제된 레진 양을 측정하였고, 자료는 SPSS법으로 비교 분석하였다. 1. 근관형성 시간은 Mtwo가 84.50초로 가장 짧았으며, 총 작업시간은 K3가 269.37초로 가장 길었다(p < 0.05). 2. 기구의 변형과 파절은 모든 구동형 NiTi 파일에서 발생하지 않았다. 3. 근관 내측 폭경의 변화는 Profile이 1, 2 mm 부위를 제외한 다른 부위에서 가장 적었으며, ProTaper Universal은 모든 부위에서 가장 많았다(p < 0.05). 4. 근관 외측 폭경의 변화는 Mtwo이 1 mm 부위를 제외한 모든 부위에서 가장 적었으며, Profile은 3, 4 mm 부위에서 가장 많았다(p < 0.05). ProTaper Universal와 K3는 1, 2, 6, 7 mm 부위에서 가장 많았다(p < 0.05). 5. 근관중심변위율(centering ratio)은 Profile이 1, 4, 5, 6 mm 부위에서 가장 적었다(p < 0.05). 이상의 결과, 구동성 NiTi 파일을 이용한 만곡 근관의 근관형성은 치경부는 ProTaper와 같은 삭제력이 높은 파일을 사용하는 것이 근관 입구를 효과적으로 넓히고 더 나은 taper를 형성하며, 근단부는 Profile과 같은 근관 중심 변위가 적은 파일을 사용하는 것이 근관형성 시간을 단축하고 근단부의 근관 변형(transportation)을 줄일 수 있다고 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 18(2):269-296, 1974.
  2. Schilder H, Yee F. Canal debridement and disinfection. In: Cohen S, Burns RC, editors. Pathways of the Pulp, 3rd ed. St Louis, MO: CV Mosby, p. 175-204, 1984.
  3. Weine FS, Kelly RF, Lio PJ. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endod 1(8):255-262, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80037-9
  4. Schafer E, Tepel J, Hoppe W. Properties of endodontic hand instruments used in rotary motion. Part 2. Instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 21(10): 493-497, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80519-4
  5. Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 14(7):346-351, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80196-1
  6. Glosson CR, Haller RH, Dove SB, del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endod 21(3):146-151, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80441-3
  7. Schafer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 39(3):196-202, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01074.x
  8. Kosa DA, Marshall G, Baumgartner JC. An Analysis of Canal Centering Using Mechanical Instrumentation Techniques. J Endod 25(6):441-445, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80275-1
  9. Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Beullens M, Wevers M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments. Int Endod J 36(4):288-295, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00650.x
  10. Schafer E, Florek H. Efficiency of rotary nickel titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 36(3):199-207, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00643.x
  11. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 30(8):559-571, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000129039.59003.9D
  12. Ayar LR, Love RM. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals. Int Endod J 37(9):593-601, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00851.x
  13. Yang GB, Zhou XD, Zhang H, Wu HK. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals. Int Endod J 39(10):791-799, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01151.x
  14. Yun H, Kim SK: A comparison of the shaping ability of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95(2):228-233, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.92
  15. 강문성, 김현철, 허복, 박정길. 학생들이 사용한 엔진 구동형 Ni-Ti file system의 근관 성형 효율 비교. 대한치과보존학회지 31(1):1-10, 2006.
  16. 임중장, 김동준, 황윤찬, 황인남, 오원만. 수종의 엔진구동형 니켈-타이타늄 파일에 의한 급한 만곡의 근관 성형시 근관형태 변화에 대한 비교연구. 대한치과보존학회지 30(4):303-311, 2005.
  17. 임유경, 박정길, 허복, 김현철. Mtwo 전동 파일을 사용한 single length technique과 crown-down technique의 근관성형 효율 비교. 대한치과보존학회지 32(4):385-396, 2007. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.4.385
  18. Calhoun G, Montgomery S. The effects of four instrumentation techniques on root canal shape. J Endod 14(6):273-277, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80025-6
  19. Kum KY, Spangberg L, Cha BY et al. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod 26: 719-723, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200012000-00013
  20. Sonntag D, Ott M, Kook K, Stachniss V. Root canal preparation with the NiTi systems K3, Mtwo and ProTaper. Aust Endod J 33(2):73-81, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00062.x
  21. 이보금, 김동준, 황윤찬, 황인남, 오원만. Profile, ProTaper 및 K-Flexofile 근관성형시 근관의 만곡도에 따른 근관 형태변화 비교연구. 대한치과보존학회지 30(4):294-302, 2005.
  22. Schafer E, Oitzinger M : Cutting efficiency of five different types of rotary nickel-titanium instruments: J Endod. 34(2):198-200, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.10.009
  23. Yoshimine Y, Ono M, Akamine A. The shaping effects of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals. J Endod 31(5):373-375, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000140568.40462.43

Cited by

  1. A comparison of dimensional standard of several nickel-titanium rotary files vol.39, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.1.7