Contributors of Extra-curricular Activities of Preschool Children: Focused on Home Environment Factors and Maternal Belief about Factors on Academic Achievement

가정환경 변인과 학업성취에 관한 어머니의 교육신념이 유아의 사교육 실태에 미치는 영향

  • Han, You-Me (Dept. of Early Childhood Education, Hoseo University)
  • 한유미 (호서대학교 유아교육과)
  • Received : 2010.01.31
  • Accepted : 2010.03.12
  • Published : 2010.03.30

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the contributors of extra-curricular activities of preschool children focusing on home environmental factors(financial capital, human capital, and social capital) and maternal belief about factors on academic achievement(child's effort, child's ability, teacher's instruction, and maternal teaching). One hundred and seventy three mothers whose preschool children were attending child-care centers in Seoul and Kyunggi-Do participated in the survey. Kinlaw et al.(2001)'s Importance of Effort/Ability Scale was used to assess the mother's belief about the factors on academic achievement. Stipek et al.(1992)'s Activities Sub-scales was revised to measure a social capital, that is the mother's formal and informal activities providing to their preschool child. Educational level was utilized as human capital and monthly income was considered as financial capital. Also, using open ended questions, the subjects were asked to respond to the numbers of extra-curricula activities their child was presently attending, and when he or she began to attend the extra-curricular activity. The main results are as follows. In general, the mothers provided informal activities to their preschool child more than formal activities. Also, they believed the teacher's instruction is the most important and the child's ability the least important in their child's academic achievement. The number of extra-curricular activities was predicted by mothers' formal activities and their belief on their child's ability. The age of starting extra-curricular activities were explained by mothers' formal activities and their educational level.

Keywords

References

  1. 경향신문 2008년 1월 24일. "2010년부터 고교 일반과목도 영어로 수업."
  2. 구인회(2003) 가족배경이 청소년의 교육성취에 미치는 영향: 가족구조와 가족소득, 빈곤의 영향을중심으로. 사회복지연구 22(가을), 5-32.
  3. 김경숙(2009) 강남 학부모의 자녀 학업지원활동 특성과 자녀교육에 대한 신념. 동국대학교 박사학위 논문.
  4. 김은정(2007) 가정의 사회경제적 지위, 사교육비, 부모-자녀관계 그리고 청소년 자녀의 학업성취 간의 관계에 관한 연구. 한국사회학 41(5),134-162.
  5. 노현경(2006) 학부모 및 학생 관련 요인과 사교육비지출간의 구조적 관계 분석. 교육행정학연구24(1), 97-118.
  6. 양정호(2005) 사교육비 지출에 대한 종단적 연구.교육사회학연구 15(2), 121-145.
  7. 오정현.정태연(2006) 자녀의 연령에 따른 어머니의양육방식에서의 차이. 한국심리학회지: 학교3(2), 43-54.
  8. 이성림(2005) 사교육비 부담과 가계의 소비지출. 한국가정관리학회지 23(3), 63-76.
  9. 이정선(2001) 가정-학교-지역사회의 사회.문화적관계. 교육인류학연구 4(2), 147-181.
  10. 임천순.우명숙.채재은(2008) 사교육 수요 분석:학습보충론과 미래투자론. 교육재정경제연구 17(2),1-27.
  11. 통계청(2008) 2007년 사교육비 실태 조사 결과. 서울: 통계청.
  12. 한국일보 2008년 8월 4일. "국제중 내년 개교 확정."한유미.Hokoda A.Song H(2008) 재미한국계 어머니들과 백인어머니들의 영유아교육과 관련된신념. 한국영유아보육학 57, 271-288.
  13. Becker GS(1993) Human Capital: A Theoretical andEmpirical Analysis with Special References toEducation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  14. Becker GS, Thomes N(1986) Human capital and therise and fall of families. Journal of Labor Economics 4, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1086/298091
  15. Boike MF, Gesten EL, Cowen E, Felner RD, FrancisRR(1978) Relations between family backgroundproblems and school problems and competenciesof young normal children. Psychology in theSchools 15, 283-290. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(197804)15:2<283::AID-PITS2310150225>3.0.CO;2-Y
  16. Brooks-Gunn J, Duncan G(1997) The effects of povertyon children. Children and Poverty 7(2), 55-71.
  17. Coleman JS(1988) Social capital in the creation ofhuman capital. American Journal of Sociology 94,95-120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
  18. Entwisle DR, Alexander KL(1996) Family type andchildren's growth in reading and math over theprimary grades. Journal of Marriage and the Family 58, 341-355. https://doi.org/10.2307/353500
  19. Fung G(1998) Meeting the instructional needs ofChinese American and Asian English languagedevelopment and at-risk students. In VO Pang, LLCheng(Eds.), Struggling to Be Heard: The UmetNeeds of Asian Pacific American Children (pp.197-220). Albany, NY: State University of NewYork Press.
  20. Hess RD, Chih-Mei C, McDevitt TM(1987) Culturalvariations in family beliefs about children's performancein mathematics: Comparisons amongpeople's Republic of China, Chinese-American, andCaucasian-American Families. Journal of Educational Psychology 79. 179-188.
  21. Holloway SD, Rambaud MF, Fuller B, Eggers-Pierola,C. (1995) What is appropriate practice at homeand in childcare? Low-income mothers' views onpreparing their children for school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 10, 451-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2006(95)90016-0
  22. Huffman LR, Speer PW(2000). Academic performanceamong at-risk children: The role of developmentallyappropriate practices. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 15(2), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(00)00048-X
  23. Huntsinger C, Jose PE, Larson, SL(1998) Do parentpractices to encourage academic competence influencethe social adjustment of young EuropeanAmerican and Chinese American children? Developmental Psychology 34. 747-756.
  24. Keith ZT, Keith P, Troutman GC, Bickely PG, TrivettePS, Singh K(1993) Does parental involvementaffect eighth grade student achievement?: Structuralanalysis of national data. School Psychology Review 22, 474-496.
  25. Kim U, Choi S(1994) Individualism, collectivism, andchild development: A Korean perspective. In PMGreenfield, RR Cocking(Eds.) Cross-cultural Rootsof Minority Child Development. NY: LawrenceErlbaum Associates.
  26. Kim U, Park Y(2006) Indigenous psychological analysisof academic achievement in Korea: The influenceof self-efficacy, parents, and culture, International Journal of Psychology 41(4). 287- 292. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590544000068
  27. Mayer SE(1997) What Money Can't Buy: Family Incomeand Children's Life Chances. MA: Harvard UniversityPress.
  28. Okagaki L, Divecha, DJ(1993) Development of parentalbeliefs. In T Luster, L Okagaki(Eds.), Parenting anEcological Perspective(pp. 35-67). Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  29. Robinson JP(1999) The time-diary method: structureand use. In WE Pentland, AS Harvey, MP Lawton,MA McColl(Eds). Time Use Research in the SocialSciences. NY: Springer.
  30. Song H(2005) Educational beliefs and practices onKorean-and European-American mothers of preschoolage children. Thesis of San Diego State University.Teachman JD, Paasch K, Carver K(1997) Social capitaland the generation of human capital. Social Forces 75(4), 1343-1359.
  31. Yeung WJ, Linver MR, Brooks-Gunn J(2002) Howmoney matters for young children's development:Parental investment and family processes. Child Development 73(6), 1861-1879. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00511