A Study on The Dispute about The Identity of Oriental Medicine - Focused on Oriental Medical Classics

한의학(韓醫學) 정체성 논의에 대한 연구 - 원전학(原典學)을 중심으로

  • Baik, You-Sang (Dept. of Oriental Medical Classics, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyunghee University)
  • 백유상 (경희대학교 한의과대학 원전학교실)
  • Received : 2010.09.03
  • Accepted : 2010.09.18
  • Published : 2010.09.25

Abstract

In this paper, on the assumption that the dispute about the identity of Oriental Medicine(OM) will finally act as an developmental element of Oriental Medicine otherwise total Korean Medicine, at first we think about what are he meaning of identity and it's essential elements, and search how to establish the standard of the identity of Oriental Medicine. From this working, the direction of the research in the Oriental Medical Classics that is one of the detail field in OM will be drawn out. The identity of Oriental Medicine must be decided according to what is the mission or existence value contributing for Korean Society, not to the form of materiality or immateriality. The core of the identity of Oriental Medical Classics is relevant to being a help to other research fields through reinterpreting the Classics. And the most important issue of research are the analysis of thinking pattern In OM, and systematization of OM knowledge and information.

Keywords

References

  1. 엄석기, 최원철. 本能과 本性에 基礎한 동아시아 전통의학의 意義에 대한 小考. 대한한의학원전학회지. 2010. 23(2). pp.63-87.
  2. 丁福喆. 조선조 의학 텍스트의 정치사상적 함의. 대한한의학원전학회지. 2010. 23(1). p.252.
  3. 엄석기, 김세현, 최원철. 전통한의학 연구방법론의 현대화에 대한 小考. 대한한의학원전학회지. 2010. 23(2). pp.103-104.
  4. 白裕相. 黃帝內經的類比推理方法論. 中國中醫基礎醫學雜誌. 2008. 14. pp.76-78.
  5. 白裕相. 한의학정보 검색엔진 개발을 위한 시소러스 연구. 대한한의학원전학회지. 2006. 19(1). p.155, 156.
  6. 최환수. 한의학 방법론에 관한 고찰. 대전대학교대학원. 1999. pp.117-129.
  7. 홍원식. 중국의학사. 서울. 동양의학연구원. p.299. 1984.
  8. 다음 국어사전. http://krdic.daum.net/dickr/ contents.do?offset=A034015900&query1=A03 4015900#A034015900. 2010. 7. 25.