DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Non-starch Polysaccharide-degrading Enzymes on Nutrient Digestibility, Growth Performance and Blood Profiles of Growing Pigs Fed a Diet Based on Corn and Soybean Meal

  • Ao, X. (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Meng, Q.W. (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Yan, L. (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, H.J. (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Hong, S.M. (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Cho, J.H. (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, I.H. (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2010.03.31
  • Accepted : 2010.07.20
  • Published : 2010.12.01

Abstract

Two experiments with growing pigs were conducted to investigate the effects of two distinct multienzyme preparations on nutrient digestibility, growth performance and blood profiles. In Exp. 1, a total of 96 pigs ($29.7{\pm}0.69\;kg$) were utilized in a 42-day performance and digestibility trial using four dietary treatments: CON (control diet), ENDO (control+0.10% Endopower), NSPase1 (control+0.10% NSPase) and NSPase2 (control+0.20% NSPase). Endopower was a commercial multienzyme preparation which contained ${\alpha}$-galactosidase, galactomannase, xylanase and ${\beta}$-glucanase. NSPase mainly contained ${\alpha}$-1,6-${\beta}$-galactosidase, ${\beta}$-1,4-mannanase and ${\beta}$-1,4-mannosidase. There were six replication pens per treatment with four pigs per pen. Pigs fed NSPase1 diet had a higher ADG (p<0.05) and G:F (p<0.05) than those fed the control diet. There were no significant differences in growth performance among the multienzyme treatments (p>0.05). Compared with CON, apparent digestibility of DM was increased (p<0.05) by ENDO treatment. N digestibility was improved (p<0.05) in response to multienzyme treatments during the experimental period. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) was higher (p<0.05) in ENDO treatment than in CON and NSPase1 treatments at the end of the experiment, while the glucose level improved (p<0.05) due to ENDO and NSPase2 treatments. In Exp. 2, four ileal-cannulated, growing barrows ($20.17{\pm}1.31\;kg$) were housed in individual metabolism crates and randomly assigned to 1of 4 treatments (same as Exp. 1) within a $4{\times}4$ Latin square design. Enzyme supplementations improved the majority of apparent ileal amino acid digestibilities (p<0.05). It is concluded that the supplementation of NSPase1 improved growth performance as well as N digestibility and partially improved apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in growing pigs fed a diet based on corn and soybean meal.

Keywords

References

  1. AOAC, 1990. Association of official analytical chemists. In: Official Methods of Analysis (Ed. S. Williams). AOAC, Arlington, VA.
  2. Austin J. Lewis and L. Lee Southern. 2001. Swine nutrition. CRC press. 173-174.
  3. Bassily, J. A., K. G. Michael and A. K. Said. 1982. Blood urea content for evaluating dietary protein quality. Br. J. Nutr. 24:983.
  4. Bedford, M. R. and G. G. Partridge. 2001. The role and efficacy of carbohydrase enzymes in pig nutrition. Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition, CABI Publishing, pp. 185-190.
  5. CVB. 1998. Veevoedertalel (Feeding value of feed ingredients). CVB, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
  6. Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range andmultiple F tests. Biometrics 11:1-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  7. Fang, Z. F., J. Peng, Z. L. Liu and Y. G. Liu. 2007. Responses of non-starch polysaccharide-degrading enzymes on digestibility and performance of growing pigs fed a diet based on corn, soya bean meal and Chinese double-low rapeseed meal. J. Anim. Physiol. Animal. Nutr. 91:361-368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2006.00664.x
  8. Graham, H., W. Lowgren, D. Petterson, and P. Aman. 1988. Effect of enzyme supplementation on digestion of a barley/pollardbased pig diet. Nutr. Rep. Int. 38:1073-1079.
  9. Grandhi, R. R. 2001. Effect of dietary ileal amino acid ratios, and supplemental carbohydrase in hulless-barley-based diets on pig performance and nitrogen excretion in manure. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 81:125-132. https://doi.org/10.4141/A00-064
  10. Hartwig, E. E., T. M. Kuo and M. M. Kenty. 1997. Seed protein and its relationship to soluble sugars in soybean. Crop. Sci. 37:770-773. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700030013x
  11. Ji, F., D. P. Casper, P. K. Brown, D. A. Spangler, K. D. Haydon and J. E. Pettigrew. 2008. Effects of dietary supplementation of an enzyme blend on the ileal and fecal digestibility of nutrients in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 86:1533-1543. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0262
  12. Kim, S. W., I. Mavromichalis and R. A. Easter. 2001a. Supplementation of alpha-1galactosidase and beta-1,4-mannanase to improve soybean meal utilization by nursery pig. J. Anim. Sci. 79(Suppl. 1):106 (Abstr.).
  13. Kim, S. W., J. H. Zhang, K. T. Soltwedel and R. A. Easter. 2001b. Supplementation of ${\bata}-1,6-galactosidase$ and 1,4-mannanase to improve soybean meal utilization by growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 79 (Suppl. 2):84 (Abstr.).
  14. Kim, I. H., J. H. Kim, J. W. Hong, O. S. Kwon, B. J. Min, W. B. Lee, K. S. Shon, M. E. Jckson and F. L. Jin. 2003a. Effects of ${\beta}-mannanase$ enzyme addition on swine performance fed low and high energy diets without antibiotics. 9th International Symposium on Digestive Physiology in Pigs. Banff, Alberta, Canada.
  15. Kim, S. W., D. A. Knabe, J. W. Hong and R. A. Easter. 2003b. Use of carbohydrases in corn-soybean meal based nursery diets. J. Anim. Sci. 81:2496-2504.
  16. Kim, S. W., J. H. Zhang, K. T. Soltwedel and D. A. Knabe. 2006. Use of carbohydrases in corn-soybean meal based growerfinisher pig diets. J. Anim. Sci. 55:473 563-578.
  17. Li, S., W. C. Sauer, S. X. Huang and V. M. Gabert. 1996. Effect of ${\beta}-glucanase$ supplementation to hulless barley- or wheatsoybean meal diets on the digestibilities of energy, protein, β-glucans, and amino acids in young pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 74:1649-1656.
  18. Liener, I. E. 1994. Implications of antinutritional components in soybean foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 34:31-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408399409527649
  19. Meng, X. F., F. O. Omogbenigun, C. M. Nyachoti and B. A. Slominski. 2002. Degrada-ion of cell wall polysaccharides by a combination of carbohydrase enzymes: in vivo and in vitro studies. J. Anim. Sci. 80 (Suppl.1):253 (Abstr.).
  20. NRC, 1998. National research council. Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals. Nutrient Requirement of Swine, 10th edn. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
  21. Omogbenigun, F. O., C. M. Nyachoti and B. A. Slominski. 2004. Dietary supplementation with multienzyme preparations improves nutrient utilization and growth performance in weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 82:1053-1061.
  22. Olukosi, O. A., J. S. Sands and O. Adeola. 2007. Supplementation of carbohydrases or phytase individually or in combination to diets for weanling and growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 85:1702-1711. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-709
  23. Petty, L. A., S. D. Carter, B. W. Senne and J. A. Shriver. 2002. Effects of ${\beta}-mannanase$ addition to corn-soybean meal diets on growth performance, carcass traits, and nutrient digestibility of weaning and growing-finishing pig. J. Anim. Sci. 80:1012-1019.
  24. Rackis, J. J. 1981. Flatulence caused by soya and its control through processing. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 58:503-511. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02582414
  25. Sauer, W. C., H. Jorgensen and R. Berzins. 1983. A modified nylon bag technique for determining apparent digestibility of protein in feedstuffs for pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 63:233-237. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas83-027
  26. SAS, 1996. SAS user's guide. Release 6.12 Editions. SAS Institute. Inc, Cary CON. USA
  27. Schulze, H. and R. G. Campbell. 1998. Effect of exogenous xylanase on performance of pigs fed corn/soy based diets. J. Anim. Sci. 76(Suppl. 1):179.
  28. Shim, Y. H., B. J. Chae and J. H. Lee. 2004. Effects of phytase and enzyme complex supplementation to diets with different nutrient levels on growth performance and ileal nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17(4): 523-532. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2004.523
  29. Trugo, L. C., A. Farah and L. Cabral. 1995. Oligosaccharide distribution in Brazilian soya been cultivars. Food Chem. 52:385-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(95)93286-Z
  30. Veum, T. L. and J. Odle. 2001. Feeding neonetal pigs. Page 671 in Swine Nutrition. 2nd ed. (Ed. A. J. Lewis and L. L. Southern). CRC Press, New York.
  31. Wang, J. P. 2009. Effects of single or carbohydrases cocktail in low-nutrient- density diets on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, and carcass traits in growing-finishing pigs. Livest. Sci. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2009.07.003
  32. Yin, Y. L., S. K. Baidoo, L. Z. Jin, Y. G. Liu, H. Schulze and P. H. Simmins. 2001. The effect of different carbohydrase and protease supplementation on apparent (ileal and overall) digestibility of nutrients of five hulless barley varieties in young pigs. Livest. Sci. 71:109-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00215-9
  33. Zijlstra, R. T., S. Li, A. Owusu-Asiedu, P. H. Simmins and J. F. Patience. 2004. Effect of carbohydrase supplementation of wheat- and canola-meal-based diets on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in group-housed weaned pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84:689-695. https://doi.org/10.4141/A03-127

Cited by

  1. Effect of feed processing and enzyme supplementation on diet digestibility and performance of male weaner pigs fed wheat-based diets in dry or liquid form vol.53, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12256
  2. sp.) Biomass in Diets for Weanling Pigs and Broiler Chickens vol.62, pp.40, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf501155n
  3. Effects of thermo-resistant non-starch polysaccharide degrading multi-enzyme on growth performance, meat quality, relative weights of body organs and blood profile in broiler chickens vol.100, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12387
  4. Effects of cellulase supplementation to corn soybean meal-based diet on the performance of sows and their piglets vol.87, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12511
  5. Proteome changes in the small intestinal mucosa of growing pigs with dietary supplementation of non-starch polysaccharide enzymes vol.15, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12953-016-0109-6
  6. High dosing NSP enzymes for total protein and digestible amino acid reformulation in a wheat/corn/soybean meal diet in broilers vol.25, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfw006
  7. Efficacy of β-mannanase supplementation to corn–soya bean meal-based diets on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood urea nitrogen, faecal coliform and lactic acid bacteria and faecal noxious gas emission in growing pigs vol.70, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2015.1117697
  8. Effects of xylanase supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood parameters, fecal microbiota, fecal score and fecal noxious gas emission of weaning pigs fed corn-soybean meal-based diet vol.88, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12771
  9. The microbial pH-stable exogenous multienzyme improved growth performance and intestinal morphology of weaned pigs fed a corn–soybean-based diet pp.0974-1844, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2017.1358628
  10. Effect of inclusion of lysolecithin or multi-enzyme in low energy diet of broiler chickens vol.46, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1484358
  11. Effects of multi-enzyme supplementation in a corn and soybean meal-based diet on growth performance, apparent digestibility, blood characteristics, fecal microbes and noxious gas emission in growing p vol.46, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20180059
  12. Supplementation of Non-Starch Polysaccharide Enzymes Cocktail in a Corn-Miscellaneous Meal Diet Improves Nutrient Digestibility and Reduces Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Finishing Pigs vol.10, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020232
  13. Effect of carbohydrases on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles, and fecal microbiota in weanling pigs fed reduced energy diet vol.100, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2018-0184
  14. Effects of Optimal Carbohydrase Mixtures on Nutrient Digestibility and Digestible Energy of Corn- and Wheat-Based Diets in Growing Pigs vol.10, pp.10, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101846
  15. Nutritive values of double-low rapeseed expellers and rapeseed meal with or without supplementation of multi-enzyme in pigs vol.100, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2019-0097
  16. Effects of Dietary Bacillus and Non-starch Polysaccharase on the Intestinal Microbiota and the Associated Changes on the Growth Performance, Intestinal Morphology, and Serum Antioxidant Profiles in Du vol.12, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.786121
  17. Effects of feeding corn distillers dried grains with solubles diets without or with supplemental enzymes on growth performance of pigs: a meta-analysis vol.5, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab029
  18. A systematic-review on the role of exogenous enzymes on the productive performance at weaning, growing and finishing in pigs vol.14, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2021.100195