Physical principles of digital radiographic imaging system

디지털 방사선영상 시스템의 기본적 원리

  • Choi, Jin-Woo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yi, Won-Jin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, BK21 Craniomaxillofacial Life Science, and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 최진우 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 구강악안면방사선학교실 및 치학연구소) ;
  • 이원진 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 구강악안면방사선학교실, BK21 치의학생명과학사업단 및 치학연구소)
  • Received : 2010.07.15
  • Accepted : 2010.08.10
  • Published : 2010.12.31

Abstract

Digital radiographic systems allow the implementation of a fully digital picture archiving and communication system (PACS), and provide the greater dynamic range of digital detectors with possible reduction of X-ray exposure to the patient. This article reviewed the basic physical principles of digital radiographic imaging system in dental clinics generally. Digital radiography can be divided into computed radiography (CR) and direct radiography (DR). CR systems acquire digital images using phosphor storage plates (PSP) with a separate image readout process. On the other hand, DR systems convert X-rays into electrical charges by means of a direct readout process. DR systems can be further divided into direct and indirect conversion systems depending on the type of X-ray conversion. While a direct conversion requires a photoconductor that converts X-ray photons into electrical charges directly, in an indirect conversion, lightsensitive sensors such as CCD or a flat-panel detector convert visible light, proportional to the incident X-ray energy by a scintillator, into electrical charges. Indirect conversion sensors using CCD or CMOS without lens-coupling are used in intraoral radiography. CR system using PSP is mainly used in extraoral radiographic system and a linear array CCD or CR sensors, in panoramic system. Currently, the digital radiographic system is an important subject in the dental field. Most studies reported that no significant difference in diagnostic performance was found between the digital and conventional systems. To accept advances in technology and utilize benefits provided by the systems, the continuous feedback between doctors and manufacturers is essential.

Keywords

References

  1. Korner M, Weber CH, Wirth S, Pfeifer KJ, Reiser MF, Treitl M. Advances in digital radiography: physical principles and system overview. Radiographics 2007; 27 : 675-86 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.273065075
  2. Bernhardt TM, Otto D, Reichel G, Ludwig K, Seifert S, Kropf S, et al. Detection of simulated interstitial lung disease and catheters with selenium, storage phosphor, and film-based radiography. Radiology 1999; 213 : 445-54. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.213.2.r99nv20445
  3. Schaefer-Prokop CM, Prokop M. Storage phosphor radiography. Eur Radiol 1997; 7 : 58-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00006866
  4. Kotter E, Langer M. Digital radiography with large-area flat-panel detectors. Eur Radiol 2002; 12 : 2562-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-002-1350-1
  5. Strotzer M, Gmeinwieser J, Volk M, Frund R, Seitz J, Manke C, et al. Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171 : 23-7. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.171.1.9648757
  6. Farman AG, Farman TT. Extraoral and panoramic systems. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44 : 257-72.