DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Specific Expression Patterns of xyl1, xyl2, and xyl3 in Response to Different Sugars in Pichia stipitis

  • Han, Ji-Hye (Department of Bioprocess Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Ju-Yong (Graduate School of Semiconductor and Chemical Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kang, Hyun-Woo (Changhae Institute of Cassava and Ethanol Research, Changhae Ethanol Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Choi, Gi-Wook (Changhae Institute of Cassava and Ethanol Research, Changhae Ethanol Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Chung, Bong-Woo (Department of Bioprocess Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Min, Ji-Ho (Department of Bioprocess Engineering, Chonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2009.12.17
  • Accepted : 2010.02.25
  • Published : 2010.05.28

Abstract

The effects of two different sugars (glucose and xylose) on the expression levels and patterns of the xylose reductase (xyl1), xylitol dehydrogenase (xyl2), and xylulokinase (xyl3) genes were analyzed using Pichia stipitis. A significant increase in mRNA levels of xyl1 was observed after 6 h growth in culture conditions using xylose as a sole carbon source, but expressions of the three genes were not influenced by normal culture media with glucose. In addition, expressions of xyl2 and xyl3 were not observed during the entire culture period during which xylose was added. It also was found that the expression level of xyl1 increased as a function of the xylose concentration (40, 60, and 80 g/l) used in this study, indicating that xyl1 expression sensitively responded to xylose in the culture media. Although the induced level of xyl2 increased slightly after 48 h in the xylose-supplemented culture conditions, the expression of xyl2 was not observed in the xylitol-supplemented culture conditions. Finally, considering the expression of each gene in response to glucose or xylose, the absolute expression levels of the three genes indicate that xyl1 is induced primarily by exposure to xylose.

Keywords

References

  1. Agbogbo, F. K. and G. Coward-Kelly. 2008. Cellulosic ethanol production using the naturally occurring xylose-fermenting yeast, Pichia stipitis. Biotechnol. Lett. 30: 1515-1524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-008-9728-z
  2. Alonori, M., I. Hiroyuki, M. Katsuji, T. Osamu, and S. Shigeki. 2009. Bioethanol production performance of five recombinant strains of laboratory and industrial xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresour. Technol. 100: 2392-2398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.047
  3. Cho, J.-Y. and T. W. Jeffries. 1998. Pichia stipitis genes for alchol dehydrogenase with fermentative and respirative functions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 1350-1358.
  4. Hahn-Hagerdal, B., K. Karhumaa, M. Jeppson, and M. F. Gorwa-Grauslund. 2007. Metabolic engineering for pentose utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 108: 147-177.
  5. Hahn-Hägerdal, B., K. Karhumaa, C. Fonseca, I. Spencer-Martins, F. Marie, and M. F. Gorwa-Grauslund. 2007. Towards industrial pentose-fermenting yeast strains. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 74: 937-953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0827-2
  6. Jeffries, T. W., I. V. Grigoriev, J. Grimwood, J. M. Laplaza, A. Aerts, A. Salamov, et al. 2007. Genome sequence of the lignocelluloses-bioconverting and xylose-fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis. Nat. Biotechnol. 25: 319-326. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1290
  7. Jeffries, T. W. 2006. Engineering yeast for xylose metabolism. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 17: 320-326.
  8. Jeffries, T. W. and J. R. Headman Van Vleet. 2009. Pichia stipitis genomics, transcriptomics, and gene clusters. FEMS Yeast Res. 9: 793-807. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2009.00525.x
  9. Jin, Y.-S., H. Ni, J. M. Laplaza, and T. W. Jeffries. 2003. Optimal growth and ethanol production from xylose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae require moderate Dxylulokinase activity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 495-503. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.1.495-503.2003
  10. Jin, Y.-S., J. M. Laplaza, and T. W. Jeffries. 2004. Saccharomyces cerevisiae engineered for xylose metabolism exhibits a respiratory response. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 6816-6825. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.11.6816-6825.2004
  11. Min, J., E. J. Kim, R. A. LaRossa, and M. B. Gu. 1999. Distinct responses of a recA::luxCDABE Escherichia coli strain to direct and indirect DNA damaging agents. Mutat. Res. 442: 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5718(99)00059-5
  12. Min, J., Y. S. Chang, and M. B. Gu. 2003. Bacterial detection to the toxicity of dioxins, polychlorinated biphenyls, and polybrominated diphenyl ethers. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 22: 2238-2242. https://doi.org/10.1897/02-465
  13. Stephen, J. W., J. W. Travis, and E. V. Kent. 2008. Semiquantitative real-time PCR for analysis of mRNA levels. Methods Mol. Med. 79: 1940-6037.
  14. Veduyn, C., R. Van Kleef, J. Frank, H. Schreuder, J. P. van Dijken, and W. A. Scheffers. 1985. Properties of the NAD(P)Hdependent xylose reductase from the xylose-fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis. Biochem. J. 226: 669-677. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj2260669
  15. Weiss, J. and N. Albermann. 2003. Quantification of mRNA levels with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 311: 561-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.09.190

Cited by

  1. Expression of bacterial xylose isomerase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae under galactose supplemented condition vol.18, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-012-0669-y
  2. Heterologous expression and biochemical characterization of a thermostable xylulose kinase fromBacillus coagulansIPE22 vol.59, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201800482
  3. d‐Xylose consumption by nonrecombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A review vol.36, pp.9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.3429