통합자연과학논문집 (Journal of Integrative Natural Science)

조선대학교 기초과학연구원 (The Basic Science Institute Chosun University)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

부분 전하의 계산과 응용

Calculation and Application of Partial Charges

  • Cho, Seung Joo (Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine & Center for Resitance Cells, College of Medicine, Chosun University)
  • 투고 : 2010.12.07
  • 심사 : 2010.12.23
  • 발행 : 2010.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Calculation of partial charge is important in chemistry. However, because there are many methods developed, it is of considerable interest to know how to calculate and apply properly to address various chemical problems. For basis set, usually double zeta quality is acceptable, and double zeta polarization function would be enough for most cases. To describe electronic state more accurately, Many electron configurations would be necessary to describe highly strained or anionic species. The NPA population introduced new concept about amide bonds, i.e., the planar geometry of nitrogen atom may not come from resonance, but from the lowering of p-orbital energy by electronegative carbonyl carbon atom. The issues for hypervalent atomic charges was also addressed by various charge derivation scheme. When the charge schemes were applied to organolithium compounds, the ionic nature of boding was revealed. This comes from the fact that previous Mulliken partial atomic charges overemphasized the covalent character, wihout much justification. The other partial charge derivation schemes such as NPA(natural population analysis), IPP (Integrated Projected Population) showed that much more ionic picture. ESP potential derived charges are generally believed to be suitable to describe intermolecular interactions, therefore they are used for molecular dynamics simulations and CoMFA (comparative molecular field analysis). The charge derivation schemes using multipole polarization was mainly applied to reproduce experimental infrared spectroscopy. In some reports these schemes are also suitable for intermecular electrostatic interactions. Charges derived from electron density gradient have shown the some bonds are not straight, but actually bent. The proper choice of charge-calculation method along with suitable level of theory and basis set are briefly discussed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. C. M. Breneman and K. B. Wieberg, "Determining Atom-Centered Monopoles from Molecular Electrostatic Potentials. The Need for High Sampling Density in Fromamide Conformational Analysis", J. Comput. Chem., Vol. 11, p. 361, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540110311
  2. A. E. Reed and P. R. Schleyer, "Chemical Bonding in Hypervalent Molecules. The Dominance of Ionic Bonding and Negative Hyperconjugation over d-Orbital Participation", J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 112, p. 1434, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00160a022
  3. A. E. Reed and F. Weinhold, "A Theoretical Model of Bonding in Hyperlithiated Carbon Compounds", J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 107, p. 1919, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00293a020
  4. K. B. Wiberg and K. E. Laidig, "Barriers to Rotation Adjacent to Double Bonds. 3. The C-O Barrier in Formic Acid, Methyl Acetone, Acetic Acid and Methyl Acetate. The Origin of Ester and Amide 'Resonance'", J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 109, p. 5935, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00254a006
  5. T. D. Thomas, M. R. F. Siggel, and A. Streitwieser, "Resonance Delocalization in the Anion is Not the Major Factor Responsible for the Higher Acidity of Carboxylic Acids Relative to Alchols", J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM), Vol. 165, p. 309, 1998.
  6. M. R. F. Siggle, A. Streitwieser, and T. D. Thomas, "The Role of Resonance and Inductive Effects in the Acidity of Carboxylic Acids", J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 110, p. 8022, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00232a011
  7. A. Jakalian, D. B. Jack, and C. I. Bayly "Fast, Efficient Generation of High-Quality Atomic Charges. AM1-BCC Model: II. Parameterization and Validation", J. Comput. Chem., Vol. 23, p. 1623, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.10128
  8. K. C. Tsai, Y. C. Chen, N. W. Hsiao, C. L. Wang, C. L. Kin, Y. C. Lee, M. Li, and B. Wang, "A comparison of different electrostatic potentials on prediction accuracy in CoMFA and CoMSIA studies", Eur. J. Med. Chem., Vol. 45, p. 1544, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.12.063
  9. R. R. Mittai, L. Harris, R. A. McKinnon, and M. J. Sorich, "Partial Charge Calculation Method Affects CoMFA QSAR Prediction Accuracy", J. Chem. Inf. Model, Vol. 49, p. 704, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci800390m
  10. R. T. Kroemer, P. Hecht, and K. R. Liedl, "Different Electrostatic Descriptors in Comparative Molecular Field Analysis: A Comparison of Molecular Electrostatic and Coulomb Potentials", J. Comput. Chem., Vol. 17, p. 1296, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199608)17:11<1296::AID-JCC2>3.0.CO;2-H
  11. K. C. Gross, P. G. Seybold, and C. M. Hadad, "Comparison of Different Atomic Charge Schemes for Predicting pKa Variations in Substituted Anilines and Phenols", Int. J. Quant. Chem., Vol. 90, p. 445, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.10108
  12. A. E. Oliveira, R. L. A. Haiduke, and R. E. Bruns, "Atomic Mean Dipole Moment Derivatives and GAPT Charges", J. Phys. Chem., A, Vol. 104, p. 5320, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1021/jp994405l
  13. P. Bagossi, G. Zahuczky, J. Tozser, I. T. Weber, and R. W. Harrison, "Improved Parameters for Generating Partial Charges: Correlation with Observed Dipole Moments", J. Mol. Model, Vol. 5, p. 143, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s008940050114