Journal of Veterinary Clinics (한국임상수의학회지)

The Korean Society of Veterinary Clinics (한국임상수의학회)
권호 표지

Evaluation of the Osseointegration in Immediatedly Loaded Implants in the Premolar Socket of the Mandible in Beagles

비글견에서 아래턱 작은어금니 Implant의 즉시 부하에 대한 평가

  • Kim, Dae-Jin (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Eun (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Seong, Yun-Sang (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jang, Hwan-Soo (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kwon, Young-Sam (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jang, Kwang-Ho (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University)
  • 김대진 (경북대학교 수의과대학) ;
  • 김정은 (경북대학교 수의과대학) ;
  • 성윤상 (경북대학교 수의과대학) ;
  • 장환수 (경북대학교 수의과대학) ;
  • 권영삼 (경북대학교 수의과대학) ;
  • 장광호 (경북대학교 수의과대학)
  • Published : 2010.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Tooth restoration with implant placement have been interested in modern veterinary dentistry. It is important to reduce the interval between the tooth extraction and the insertion of the implants, to determine the restoration time after implant placement in dogs The aim of the this study was to compare the bone mineral apposition rate of immediately loaded implants with an unloaded control during the early healing state in the artificial extraction mandible. In four Beagles, two premolar sockets (PM2 and PM3) of the both sides of the mandible were installed with a one stage titanium mini-implant with a length of 11 mm and a diameter of 3.37 mm immediately after tooth extraction. Provisional restroration was given to implants, 3 weeks after implant placement in the left side (immediate loading) and 12 weeks in the right side (delayed loading), respectively. Radiographic and histologic examinations were performed. Radiographic evaluation revealed no significant difference between two groups. Bone-implant contact was $47.1{\pm}8.9$ in immediate loading and $50.2{\pm}8.2$ in delayed loading, interthread bone density was $78.7{\pm}10.9$ in immediate loading and $73.1{\pm}15.5$ in delayed loading, and peri-implant bone density was $95.4{\pm}7.1$ in immediate loading and $95.0{\pm}5.2$ in delayed loading, respectively. Three histologic analyses showed no significant difference between delayed and immediate loading. Followed by this study, the immediate loading of implants insterted into fresh extraction sockets after tooth extraction could be considered in veterinary dentistry.

Keywords

References

  1. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, Lang PN and Lindhe J. Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Impl Res 2004; 15: 381-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01082.x
  2. Arataki T, Furuya Y, Ito T, Miyashita Y, Shimamura I and Yajima Y. Pre-operative drilling simulation method for dental implant treatment. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2007; 48: 27-35. https://doi.org/10.2209/tdcpublication.48.27
  3. Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL and Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 645-652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.x
  4. Barone A, Rispoli L, Vozza I, Quaranta A and Covani U. Immediate restoration of single implants placed immediately after tooth extraction. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 1914-1920. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.060072
  5. Bergludh T, Abrahamsson I, Welander M, Lang NP and Lindhe J. Morphogenesis of the peri-implant mucosa: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Impl Res 2007; 18: 1-8.
  6. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP and Lindhe J. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endossoeus implants A model study in the dog. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003; 14: 251- 262. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00972.x
  7. Botticielli D, Berglundh T and Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol 2004; 32: 820-828.
  8. Branemark PI, Introduction to osseointegration. In: Branemark PI, Zarb G, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1995: 11-76.
  9. Brugnami F and Caleffi C. Prosthetically driven implant placement. How to achieve the appropriate implant site development. Keio J Med 2005; 54: 172-178. https://doi.org/10.2302/kjm.54.172
  10. Buser D, Bragger U, Lang NP and Nyman S. Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990; 1: 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010104.x
  11. Cardaropoli G, Araújo M, and Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30: 809-818. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.00366.x
  12. Chen ST, Darby IB and Reynolds EC. A prospective clinical study of non-submerged immediate implants: clinical outcomes and esthetic results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 552- 562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01388.x
  13. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL and Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 40: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-Q
  14. Cornelini R, Cangini F, Covani U and Wilson TG Jr. Immediate restoration of implants placed into fresh extraction sockets for single-tooth replacement: a prospective clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 25: 439-447.
  15. Covani U, Barone A, Cornelini R, Crespi R. Clinical outcome of implants placed immediately after implant removal. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 722-727 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.040414
  16. Covani U, Crespi R, Cornekini R, Varone A. Immediate implants supporting single crown restoration; A 4-year prospective study. J Periodontol 2004; 74: 982-988.
  17. Darby SC. Dental implants: Maintenance, care and treatment of peri-implant infection. Aust Dent J 2003; 48: 212-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2003.tb00034.x
  18. Ericsson I, Nilson H, Lindh T, Nilner K, Randow K. Immediate functional loading of Brånemark single tooth implants. An 18 months' clinical pilot follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011001026.x
  19. Finne K, Rompen E and Toljanic J. 2007: Clinical evaluation of a prospective multicenter study on 1-piece implants. Part 1: Marginal bone level evaluation after 1 year of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 226-234.
  20. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J periodontol 2000; 71: 1412-1424. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.9.1412
  21. Malo P, de Arajo Nobre M and Rangert B. Short implants placed one-Stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007; 9: 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00027.x
  22. Mannai C. Early implant loading in severely resorbed maxilla using xenograft, autograft, and platelet-rich plasma in 97 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64: 1420-1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.05.028
  23. Martins MC, Shibli JA, Abi-Rached RSG and Marcantonio E. Jr. Progression of experimental chronic peri-implantitis in dogs: Clinical and radiographic evaluation. J Periodontol 2005; 76: 1367-1373. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.8.1367
  24. Nethander G, Skoglund A and Kahnberg KE. Experimental autogenous tooth transplantation in the dog: a comparison between one- and two-stage surgical techniques. Acta Odontol Scand 2003; 61: 223-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350310004098
  25. Nordin T, Graf J, Frykholm A and Hellde'n L. Early functional loading of sand-blasted and acid-etched (SLA) Straumann implants following immediate placement in maxillary extraction sockets. Clinical and radiographic result. Clin Oral Impl Res 2007; 18: 441-451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01387.x
  26. Novaes AB Jr, Marcaccini AM, Souza SL, Taba M Jr and Grisi MFM. Immediate placement of implants into periodontally infected sites in dogs: A histomorphometric study of boneimplant contact. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 391- 398.
  27. Parel SM and Triplett RG. Immediate fixture placement: A treatment planning alternative. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 337-345.
  28. Piliero SJ, Schnitman P, Pentel L, Cranin AN and Dennison TA. Hisotpahology of oral endosteal metallic implants in dogs. J Dent Res 1973; 52: 1117-1127. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345730520052101
  29. Sagara M, Akagawa Y, Nikai H and Tsuru H. The effects of early occlusal loading on one-stage titanium alloy implants in beagle dogs: A pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69: 281-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90107-Y
  30. Sammartino G, Marenzi G, di Lauro AE and Paolantoni G. Aesthetics in oral implantology: biological, clinical, surgical, and prosthetic aspects. Implant Dent 2007; 16: 54-65. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3180327821
  31. Schliephake H, Wichmann M, Donnerstag F and Vogt S. Imaging of peri-implant bone level of implants with buccal bone defects A radiograghic and histometric accuracystudy. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003; 14: 193-200. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140209.x
  32. Schropp L, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A, Isidor F. Clinical and radiographic performance of delayed-immediate single-tooth implant placement associated with peri-implant bone defects. A 2-year prospective, controlled, randomized follow-up report. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 480-487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00699.x
  33. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L and Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour chantes following single-tooth extraction: A clinical and radiographic 12-months prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23: 313-323.
  34. Tang CS, Adam E and Naylor BS. Single-Unit implants versus conventional treatments for compromised teeth: A brief review of the evidence. J Dent Educ 2005; 69: 414-428.