Journal of Veterinary Clinics (한국임상수의학회지)

The Korean Society of Veterinary Clinics (한국임상수의학회)
권호 표지

Attitudes toward Animals and Decision Making on Veterinary Ethical Issues in Korean Veterinary Students

한국 수의과대학 학생의 동물에 대한 태도 및 동물진료 관련 윤리적 의사결정

  • Chun, Myung-Sun (College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Suk (College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, Mun-Han (College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University) ;
  • Ryu, Pan-Dong (College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University)
  • Published : 2010.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To examine the attitude of students toward animals and its relation to veterinary ethical decision making, 302 pre-veterinary and veterinary students of three national universities (Seoul, Chungbuk and Kyungsang National University) were requested to answer the Animal Attitude Scale Test, an indicator of one's pro-animal attitude. A significant gender difference in the AAS scores was found with higher scores in females (female vs. male, 65.27 vs. 57.40; p < 0.0001). The students who have companion animals had higher AAS scores (62.55) than those who donot (58.03, p < 0.0001). However, years of study and experience with animal protection activities did not affect the AAS scores. The correlation between the attitude toward animals and ethical decision making was found in the investigation with two cases of a veterinary ethical dilemma: the medical treatment of a cow in its last gestation stage with ocular squamous cell carcinoma and the euthanizing of a 12 year-old dog with urinary incontinence. The students tend to support for veterinarians to influence clients' decisions in treatment by using their power as medical professionals, even if doing so could partly damage the interests of the clients or patients. The significant correlations between the AAS scores and veterinary ethical decision making were found in this study, which implies that the attitude toward animals should be considered as one of the major factors in making ethical decisions in veterinary practice.

Keywords

References

  1. Davey G. Chinese university students' attitudes toward the ethical treatment and welfare of animals. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2006; 9: 289-297. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0904_4
  2. Hagelin J, Hau J, Carlsson HE. Attitude of Swedish veterinary and medical students to animal experimentation. Vet Rec 2000; 146: 757-60. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.146.26.757
  3. Herzog HA. Gender differences in human-animal interactions: a review. Anthrozoos 2007; 20: 7-21. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279307780216687
  4. Kellert SR, Berry JK. Attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. Wildlife Society Bulletin 1987; 15: 363-371.
  5. Mullan S, Main D. Principles of ethical decision-making in veterinary practice. In practice 2001; 23: 394-401. https://doi.org/10.1136/inpract.23.7.394
  6. Orlans FB. In the name of science. Oxford; Oxford University Press. 1993: 20-34.
  7. Paul ES, Podberscek AL. Veterinary education and students' attitudes towards animal welfare. Vet Rec 2000; 146: 269-272. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.146.10.269
  8. Rollin BE. Veterinary ethics and animal welfare. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2000; 36: 477-479.
  9. Rollin BE. The use and abuse of Aesculapian authority in veterinary medicine. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 220: 1144- 1149. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2002.220.1144
  10. Rollin BE. An introduction to veterinary medical ethics: theory and cases 2nd ed. Ames; Blackwell Pub. 2006: 106-107.
  11. Self DJ, Scharder DE, Baldwin DC, Root SK, Wolinsky FD, Shadduck JA. Study of the influence of veterinary medical education on the moral development of veterinary students. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 220: 782-787.
  12. Signal TD, Taylor N. Attitudes to animals in the animal protection community compared to a normative community sample. Society & Animals 2006; 14: 265-274. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853006778149181
  13. S ignal TD, Taylor N. Attitudes to animals: demographics within a community sample. Society & Animals 2006; 14: 147-158. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853006776778743
  14. Tannenbaum J. Veterinary ethics. St.Louis; Mosby. 1995: 44-59.
  15. Taylor N, Signal TD. Pet, pest, profit: isolating differences in attitudes towards the treatment of animals. Anthrozoos 2009; 22: 129-135. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303709X434158
  16. Yerlikaya H, Ozen A, Yasar A, Armutak A, Ozturk R, Bayrak S, Gezman A, Seker I. A survey of attitudes of Turkish veterinary students and educators about animal use in research. Vet Med Czech 2004; 49: 413-420.