한국전문물리치료학회지 (Physical Therapy Korea)

  • 제17권2호
  • /
  • Pages.10-16
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1225-8962(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-982X(eISSN)
한국전문물리치료학회 (Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy)
권호 표지

익상견갑의 평가를 위한 "Scapulometer"의 신뢰도 연구

Reliability of Scapular Winging Measurement Using a Scapulometer

  • 원종혁 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 원주기독병원 재활의학과) ;
  • 최홍식 (한서대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 권혁철 (대구대학교 재활과학대학 재활공학과)
  • 투고 : 2010.03.20
  • 심사 : 2010.04.28
  • 발행 : 2010.05.21
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study was undertaken to develop the scapulometer, a measuring tool for scapular winging, and to determine the reliability of scapulometer. Thirty subjects with scapular winging greater than 2 cm participated in this study. Two examiners measured scapular winging using the scapulometer. Standardized measurement position of each subject was as follows: neutral position of shoulder and wrist, $90^{\circ}$ flexion of elbow, and cuff weight of 5% and 10% of body weight (BW) to neutral wrist. The interrater and intrarater reliability were calculated with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and standard error of measurement (SEM) at 5% BW and 10% BW. The level of scapular winging was tested between 5% BW and 10% BW with a paired t-test. The interrater reliability was shown to be high at 5% BW (ICC(2,k)=.955, 95% CI=.900~.979, SEM=.07) and at 10% BW (ICC(2,k)=.968, 95% CI=.930~.985, SEM=.06). The intrarater reliability was shown to be high at 5% BW (ICC(2,k)=.921, 95% CI=.842~.961, SEM=.09) and at 10% BW (ICC(2,k)=.906, 95% CI=.813~.954, SEM=.10). The level of scapular winging was significantly different between 5% BW and 10% BW. Conclusively, it is demonstrated that the scapulometer is an objective and qualitative measurement tool for scapular winging.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bergqvist U, Wolgast E, Nilsson B, et al. Musculoskeletal disorders among visual display terminal workers: Individual, ergonomic, and work organizstional factors. Ergonomics. 1995;38(4):763-776. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925148
  2. Cools AM, Witvrouw EE, Declercq GA, et al. Scapular muscle recruitment patterns: Trapezius musle latency with and without impingement symptoms. Am J Sports Med. 2003(4);31:542-549.
  3. Cools AM, Declercq GA, Cambier DC, et al. Trapezius activity and intramuscular balance during isokinetic exercise in overhead athletes with impingement symptoms. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007;17(1):25-33.
  4. Cools AM, Witvrouw EE, Declercq GA, et al. Evaluation of isokinetic force production and associated muscle activity in the scapular rotators during a protraction-retraction movement in overhead athletes with impingement symptoms. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38(1):64-68. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2003.004952
  5. Culham E, Peat M. Functional anatomy of the shoulder complex. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993;18(1):343-350.
  6. Kibler WB, McMullen J. Scapular dyskinesis and its relation to shoulder pain. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11(2):142-151.
  7. Kibler WB, Safran M. Tennis injuries. Med Sport Sci. 2005;48:120-137.
  8. Kibler WE, Uhl TL, Maddux JW, et al. Qualitative clinical evaluation of scapular dysfunction: A reliability study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(6):550-556. https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2002.126766
  9. Levangie PK, Norkin CC: Joint Structure and Function. A comprehensive analysis. Philadelphia, F.A. Davis Co., 1992:215-217.
  10. Ludewig PM, Cook TM. Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement. Phys Ther. 20000;80(3):276-291.
  11. Lukasiewicz AC, McCIure P, Michener L, et al. Comparison of 3-dimensional scapular position and orientation between subjects with and without shoulder impingement. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999;29(10):574-583.
  12. McCIure PW, Bialker J, Neff N, et al. Shoulder function and 3-dimensional kinematics in people with shoulder impingement syndrome before and after a 6-week exercise program. Phys Ther. 2004:84(9):832-848.
  13. McClure P, Tate AR, Kareha S, et al. A clinical method for identifying scapular dyskinesis, part 1: Reliability. J Athl Train. 2009:44(2):160-164. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-44.2.160
  14. Nijs J, Roussel N, Vermeulen K, et al. Scapular positioning in patients with shoulder pain: A study examining the reliability and clinical importance of 3 clinical tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(7):1349-1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.021
  15. Nygren A, Berglund A, von Koch M. Neck and shoulder pain, an increasing problem. Strategies for using insurance material to follow trends. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1995;32:107-112.
  16. Plafcan DM, Turczany PJ, Guenin BA, et al. An objective measurement technique for posterior scapular displacement. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997;25:336-341.
  17. Sahrmann SA. Diagnosis and Treatment of Movement Impairment Syndromes. St Louis, Mosby, 2002:193-245.
  18. Schmitt L, Snyder-Mackler L. Role of scapular stabilizers in etiology and treatment of impingement syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1999;29(1):31-38.
  19. Struyf F, Nijs F, Coninck K, et al. Clinical assessment of scapular positioning in musicians: An intertester reliabilty study. J Athl Train. 2009;44(5):519-526. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-44.5.519
  20. Warner JJ, Micheli LJ, Arslanian LE, et al. Scapulothoracic motion in normal shoulders and shouIders with glenohumeral instability and impingement syndrome. A study using Moire toprgraphic analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;285:191-199.