Expression Methods and Compositions of Peony Patterns in Chinese Textiles

중국 직물 모란무늬의 표현방법 및 구성형태에 관한 연구

  • Qiao, Dan (Dept. of Clothing, Chung-ang University) ;
  • Lee, Eun-Jin (Dept. of Costume Design, Dongshin University)
  • 교단 (중앙대학교 의류학과) ;
  • 이은진 (동신대학교 의상디자인학과)
  • Published : 2010.01.31

Abstract

In this study, the subjects are the expression methods and compositions of peony patterns in Chinese textiles. This study represents the peony patterns which are from Tang Dynasty to the Qing Dynasty, the research subjects are the peony patterns in fabric, except the peony patterns which are expressed by gold foil, embroidery and kesi. The objects of this study are 72 pieces of peony patterns. We sketched the configuration details of peony patterns through the Illustrator program. Analyze and classify the configuration accurately. Based on the 72 pieces of peony patterns, expression methods and compositions of the peony pattern are as following, firstly, we classified peony patterns into three categories, based on expression methods, as realistic shape, pattern shape and shape. Among these 72 fabric relics, there most of realistic shape 42 pieces(58.3%), pattern shape 25 pieces(34.7%), and shape 5 pieces(7.0%). Secondly, in the realistic shape peony, the most of pattern has petal accumulate as grape- shaped. This type is found in almost every Dynasty and was used regularly in the eras of Song and Ming Dynasty. In the era of Ming Dynasty, by using petals like the curly mushroom, Yeongji(靈芝), the pattern of symbolizing longevity was habitually used. The U-shaped flower pattern (type E) and the pattern of emphasizing the veins of petals are found only in the remains of the era of Qing Dynasty. Thirdly, in the pattern shaped peony, the most of pattern has some petals which are separated(type C). Fourthly, we classified peony patterns into four categories, based on compositions, as individual branch form, floral branch form, cluster branch form and floral nest form. Among these 72 fabric relics, there most of individual branch form 33 pieces(45.8%), floral branch form 18 pieces(25.0%), cluster branch form 13 pieces(18.1%), floral nest form 8 pieces(11.1%).

Keywords

References

  1. 諸稿轍次(1958). 大漢和辭典 卷七. 東京: 大修全官書店 p. 627.
  2. 周敦頤. 愛薄設. '牡丹花之富貴者也'
  3. 이순자 (1985). 牡丹紋様에 대한 考察. 服飾, 9. pp.89-106.
  4. 유혜영 (1987). 모란문 연구. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  5. 이영란 (1992). 모란문양에 대한 고찰-조선조 공예품 중심으로, 한국조형교육. 8, pp. 87-109.
  6. 김재임 (1999). 한, 중, 일 모란문양의 비교 연구. 충남대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  7. 祁慶富. 申敬燮(1997). 中韓傳統織繍染色中的牡丹紋様. 民族藝術, 2月號. http://epub.cnki.net/grid2008/detail.aspx-filename=MZYS199702014&dbname=CJFD1997
  8. 張靜, 張竟琼. 梁專娥 (2007). 牡丹紋様在民間服飾中的 形式美. 紡織學報 2月號. http://epub.cnki.net/grid2008/detail.aspx-filename=FZXB200702030&dbname=cjfd2007
  9. 王蕾(2008). 解析民間服飾中的牡丹紋様. 中國科技信息, 15期 http://epub.cnki.net/grid2008/detail.aspx-filename=XXJK200815095&dbname=cjfd2008
  10. 神農本草經. 草 中品
  11. 章絢. 劉賽客嘉話錄
  12. 劉禹錫, 賞牡丹. '唯有牡丹眞國色'
  13. 包銘新. 李暁君. 越敏(2004). 中國服飾這棵樹. 上海: 上海書店出版祉. p. 70.
  14. 田自乗. 呉淑生. 田靑 (2003). 中國紋様史. 北京: 高等教育出版社 pp. 220-229.
  15. 이용로 (2006). 韓國植物圖鑑. 서울: 敎學社 p. 396.
  16. 김옥임, 남정칠 (2009). 식물비교도감. 서울: 현암사, p. 115.
  17. 이영로 (2006). 한국식물도감. 서울: 교학사. p. 396.
  18. 張翊. 花經.
  19. 楊万里. 德壽宮慶壽口号.
  20. 營造法式 巻12. 雕木作制度.
  21. 營造法式 巻14. 彩畵作制度.
  22. 黄文弼. 陳崇器 (2002). 烏語花香的南宋紗羅. 科學无限, 7月號. http://www.kepu.net.cn/gb/ezine/62_0729.html
  23. 田自乗. 呉淑生. 田青. (2003). 中國紋様史. 北京: 高等教育出版社. 299.
  24. 桃燧. 序牡丹.
  25. 徐百佳 (2004). 粗鑛豪放, 錯彩樓金的元代染織紋様. 蘇州大學學報, 6月號. http://epub.cnki.net/grid2008/detail.aspx-filename=SILK200403006&dbname=CJFD2004
  26. 三才圖會, 巻6 草木十二巻.
  27. 下宗舜. 周旭. 史玉琢 (1999) 中國工藝美術史. 北京: 中國經工業出版社, p. 417.
  28. 韓澄 (2006). 明清時期織繍品吉祥紋様考据. 飾 9月號 http://epub.cnki.net/grid2008/detail.aspx-filename=SHIZ200603012&dbname=cjfd2006
  29. 班昆 (2002). 中國傳統圖案大觀, 3. 北京: 人民美術出版社. p. 5.
  30. 趟孟儉. 桑籬圓牡丹譜.
  31. 愚叟丘璩. 牡丹榮辱志.
  32. 趙丰 (2005). 絲綢藝術史. 北京: 文物出版社. p. 541.
  33. 張道一 (2004). 中國的吉祥文化. 江蘇工藝美術, 3期. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZJGY200402001.htm
  34. 包銘新. 趙丰 (1997) 中國絲綢繍鑑賞與收藏. 上海: 上海 書店出版社. pp. 54-55.
  35. 越丰 (2005). 中國絲綢通史. 蘇州 : 蘇州大學出版社. pp. 458-463.
  36. 김재임. (1999). 한, 중, 일 모란문양의 비교 연구. 충남대학교 대학원 박사학위논문. pp. 95-101.