DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reliability assessment of EPB tunnel-related settlement

  • Goh, Anthony T.C. (School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University) ;
  • Hefney, A.M. (School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University)
  • Received : 2009.10.30
  • Accepted : 2010.03.15
  • Published : 2010.03.25

Abstract

A major consideration in the design of tunnels in urban areas is the prediction of the ground movements and surface settlements associated with the tunneling operations. Excessive ground movements can damage adjacent building and utilities. In this paper, a neural network model is used to predict the maximum surface settlement, based on instrumented results from three separate EPB tunneling projects in Singapore. This paper demonstrates that by coupling the trained neural network model to a spreadsheet optimization technique, the reliability assessment of the settlement serviceability limit state can be carried out using the first-order reliability method. With this method, it is possible to carry out sensitivity studies to examine the effect of the level of uncertainty of each parameter uncertainty on the probability that the serviceability limit state has been exceeded.

Keywords

References

  1. Ang, A.H.S. and Tang, W.H. (1984), Probability concepts in engineering planning and design, Vol. II - Decision, risk and reliability, New York, John Wiley and Sons.
  2. Attewell, P.B. (1977), "Ground movements caused by tunneling in soil", Proc. Conf. on large ground movements and structures, Pentech Press, London, 812-948.
  3. Caudill, M. and Butler, C. (1991), Naturally intelligent systems, Cambridge MA, MIT Press.
  4. Cornell, C.A. (1969), "A probability-based structural code", ACI J., 66(12), 974-985.
  5. Ditlevsen, O. (1981), Uncertainty modeling: with applications to multidimensional civil engineering systems, New York, McGraw-Hill.
  6. Goh, A.T.C. and Kulhawy, F.H. (2003), "Neural network approach to model the limit state surface for reliability analysis", Can. Geotech. J., 40(6), 1235-1244. https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-056
  7. Goh, A.T.C. and Kulhawy, F.H. (2005), "Reliability assessment of serviceability performance of braced retaining walls using a neural network approach", Int. J. Numer. Anal. Met., 29(6), 627-642. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.432
  8. Hasofer, A.M. and Lind, N. (1974), "An exact and invariant first-order reliability format", J. Eng. Mech. - ASCE, 100(1), 111-121.
  9. Hornik, K. (1991), "Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks", Neural Networks, 4(2), 251-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(91)90009-T
  10. Hulme, T.W. and Burchell, A.J. (1999), "Tunneling projects in Singapore: an overview", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 14(4), 409-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(00)00004-3
  11. Izumi, C., Khatri, N.N., Norrish, A. and Davies, R. (2000), "Stability and settlement due to bored tunneling for LTA, NEL", Proc. Int. Conf. on tunnels and underground structures, Singapore, 555-560.
  12. Juang, C.H., Fang, S.Y. and Khor, E.H. (2006), "First-order reliability method for probabilistic liquefaction triggering analysis using CPT", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. - ASCE, 132(3), 337-350. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:3(337)
  13. Kim, C.Y., Bae, G.J., Hong, S.W., Park, C.H., Moon, H.K. and Shin, H.S. (2001), "Neural network based prediction of ground settlements due to tunneling", Comput. Geotech., 28(6-7), 517-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(01)00011-8
  14. Low, B.K. and Tang, W.H. (2004), "Reliability analysis using object-oriented constrained optimization", Struct. Safety, 26(1), 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(03)00023-7
  15. Mair, R.J., Taylor, R.N. and Bracegirdle, A. (1993), "Subsurface settlement profiles above tunnels in clays", Geotech., 43(2), 315-320. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1993.43.2.315
  16. Melchers, R.E. (1987), Structural reliability: analysis and prediction, Chichester UK, Ellis Horwood Ltd.
  17. Rowe, R.K. and Lee, K.M. (1992), "An evaluation of simplified techniques for estimating three dimensional undrained ground movements due to tunneling in soft soils", Can. Geotech. J., 29, 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1139/t92-005
  18. Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E. and Williams, R.J. (1986), "Learning internal representation by error propagation", Parallel distributed processing, Edited by D.E. Rumelhart, J.L. McClelland, Cambridge MA, MIT Press, 318- 362.
  19. Santos, O.J. Jr. and Celestino, T.B. (2008), "Artificial neural networks of Sao Paulo subway tunnel settlement data", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 23, 481-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.07.002
  20. Sharma, J.S., Chu, J. and Zhao, J. (1999), "Geological and geotechnical features of Singapore: an overview", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 14(4), 419-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(00)00005-5
  21. Shi, J., Ortigao, J.A.R. and Bai, J. (1998), "Modular neural networks for predicting settlements during tunneling", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. - ASCE, 124(5), 389-395. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:5(389)
  22. Shinozuka, M. (1983), "Basic analysis of structural safety", J. Struct. Div. - ASCE, 3(109), 721-740.
  23. Shirlaw, N., Ong, J.C.W., Rosser, H.B., Tan, C.G., Osborne, N.H. and Heslop, P.E. (2003), "Local settlements and sinkholes due to EPB tunneling", Proc. ICE, Geotech. Eng., 156(GE4), 193-211. https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.2003.156.4.193
  24. Suwansawat, S. and Einstein, H.H. (2008), "Artificial neural networks for predicting the maximum surface settlement caused by EPB shield tunneling", Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 21(2), 133-150.
  25. Uriel, A.O. and Sagaseta, C. (1989), "Selection of design parameters for underground construction", Proc. 12th ICSMFE, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Balkema 4, 2521-2551.

Cited by

  1. Reliability analysis of serviceability performance for an underground cavern using a non-intrusive stochastic method vol.71, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2521-x
  2. Determination of earth pressure balance tunnel-related maximum surface settlement: a multivariate adaptive regression splines approach 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0937-8
  3. Determination of tunnel support pressure under the pile tip using upper and lower bounds with a superimposed approach vol.11, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2016.11.4.587
  4. Multivariate adaptive regression splines for analysis of geotechnical engineering systems vol.48, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.09.016
  5. Progresses on the intelligent construction and operation maintenance of urban under-lake tunnels vol.295, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201929501006
  6. EPB tunneling in cohesionless soils: A study on Tabriz Metro settlements vol.19, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2019.19.2.153
  7. Machine learning to inform tunnelling operations: recent advances and future trends vol.173, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1680/jsmic.20.00011
  8. Evaluation of geological conditions and clogging of tunneling using machine learning vol.25, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2021.25.1.059
  9. Revised Comparison of Tunnel Collapse Frequencies and Tunnel Failure Probabilities vol.7, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1061/ajrua6.0001107