Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

On the influence of strong-ground motion duration on residual displacement demands

  • Ruiz-Garcia, Jorge (Facultad de Ingenieria Civil, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo)
  • Received : 2009.11.06
  • Accepted : 2010.09.26
  • Published : 2010.12.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper summarizes results of a comprehensive analytical study aimed at evaluating the influence of strong ground motion duration on residual displacement demands of single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) and multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) systems. For that purpose, two sets of 20 earthquake ground motions representative of short-duration and long-duration records were considered in this investigation. While the influence of strong ground motion duration was evaluated through constant-strength residual displacement ratios, $C_r$, computed from the nonlinear response of elastoplastic SDOF systems, its effect on the amplitude and height-wise distribution of residual drift demands in MDOF systems was studied from the response of three one-bay two-dimensional generic frame models. In this investigation, an inelastic ground motion intensity measure was employed to scale each record, which allowed reducing the record-to-record variability in the estimation of residual drift demands. From the results obtained in this study, it was found that long strong-motion duration records might trigger larger median $C_r$ ratios for SDOF systems having short-to-medium period of vibration than short strong-motion duration records. However, taking into account the large record-to-record variability of $C_r$, it was found that strong motion duration might not be statistically significant for most of the combinations of period of vibration and levels of lateral strength considered in this study. In addition, strong motion duration does not have a significant influence on the amplitude of peak residual drift demands in MDOF systems, but records having long strong-motion duration tend to increase residual drift demands in the upper stories of long-period generic frames.

Keywords

References

  1. Bernal, D. (1992), "Instability of buildings subjected to earthquakes", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 118 (8), 2239-2260. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:8(2239)
  2. Bommer, J. and Martinez-Pereira, A. (1999), "The effective duration of earthquake strong motion", J. Earthq. Eng., 3(2), 127-172.
  3. Carr, A.J. (2008), RUAUMOKO - Inelastic dynamic analysis program, Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  4. Chai, Y.H., Fajfar, P. and Romstad, K. M. (1998), "Formulation of duration-dependent inelastic seismic design spectrum", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 124(8), 913-921. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:8(913)
  5. Chai, Y.H. (2004), "Incorporating low-cycle fatigue model into duration-dependent inelastic seismic design spectra", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34, 83-96.
  6. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2000), "Building period formulas for estimating seismic displacements", Earthq. Spectra, 16(2), 533-536. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586125
  7. Cosenza, E., Iervoloino, I., Manfredi, G. (2004), "On ground motion duration and engineering demand parameters", Report PEER 2004/05, 309-320.
  8. Cosenza, E. and Manfredi, G. (2000), "Damage index and damage measures", Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater., 2(1), 50-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1528-2716(200001/03)2:1<50::AID-PSE7>3.0.CO;2-S
  9. Eliopoulos, D.F. and Wen, Y.K. (1991), "Methods of seismic reliability evaluation for moment-resisting steel frames", Civil Engineering Studies, Structural Research Series Report No. 562, University of Illinois.
  10. Fajfar, P. and Fischinger, M. (1990), "Earthquake design spectra considering duration of ground motion," Proceedings of the Fourth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 15-24.
  11. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2000), "Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings", Report FEMA 356, Washington, D.C.
  12. Hancock, J. and Bommer, J.J. (2006), "A state-of-knowledge review of the influence of strong-motion duration on structural damage", Earthq. Spectra, 22, 827-845. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2220576
  13. Ibarra, L. and Krawinkler, H. (2003), "Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations", Report TR-152, John A. Blume Earth. Engrg. Ctr. Stanford University, CA.
  14. Iervolino, I., Manfredi, G.Y. and Cosenza, E. (2006), "Ground motion duration effects on non-linear seismic response", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.529
  15. Mahin, S.A. (1980), "Effects of duration and aftershocks on inelastic design earthquakes," Proceedings of the Seventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Delhi, India, 677-680.
  16. Luco, N., Bazzurro, P. and Cornell, C.A. (2004), "Dynamic versus static computation of the residual capacity of a mainshock-damaged building to withstand an aftershock", Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper 2405, Vancouver, Canada.
  17. Pampanin, S., Christopoulos, C. and Priestley, M.J.N. (2003), "Performance-based seismic response of framed structures including residual deformations. Part II: Multiple-degree-of-freedom systems", J. Earthq. Eng., 7(1), 119-147.
  18. Ruiz-Garcia, J. and Miranda, E. (2010), "Probabilistic estimation of residual drift demands for seismic assessment of multi-story framed buildings", Eng. Struct., 32, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.010
  19. Ruiz-Garcia, J. and Miranda, E. (2008), "Residual displacement ratios of SDOF systems subjected to near-fault ground motions", Procedings of 8th. US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 36, 1235-1254.
  20. Ruiz-Garcia, J. and Miranda, E. (2007), "Probabilistic estimation of maximum inelastic displacement demands for performance-based design", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36, 1235-1254. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.680
  21. Ruiz-Garcia, J. and Miranda, E. (2006a), "Evaluation of residual drift demands in regular multi-story frame buildings for performance-based assessment", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(13), 1609-1629. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.593
  22. Ruiz-Garcia, J. and Miranda, E. (2006b), "Residual displacement ratios for assessment of existing structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(3), 315-336. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.523
  23. Ruiz-Garcia, J. and Miranda, E. (2005), "Performance-based assessment of existing structures accounting for residual displacements", Report No. 153, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engrg Ctr, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
  24. Ruiz-Garcia, J. and Miranda, E. (2003), "Inelastic displacement ratios for evaluation of existing structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32(9), 1237-1258. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.271
  25. Trifunac, M.D. and Brady, A.J. (1975), "A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion", B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 65(3), 581-626.
  26. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 26(3), 701-716.
  27. Villaverde, R. (1991), "Explanation of the numerous upper floor collapses during the 1985 Mexico-City earthquake", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 20(3), 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290200303

Cited by

  1. Duration effect of spectrally matched ground motions on seismic demands of elastic perfectly plastic SDOFS vol.90, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.02.013
  2. Influence of ground motion duration on damage index-based fragility assessment of a plan-asymmetric non-ductile reinforced concrete building vol.151, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.042
  3. Vertical ductility demand and residual displacement of roof-type steel structures subjected to vertical earthquake ground motions vol.104, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.10.019
  4. Numerical modeling and analysis of RC frames subjected to multiple earthquakes vol.9, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.5.957
  5. Effect of ground motion duration on earthquake-induced structural collapse vol.41, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.12.002
  6. Cumulative absolute velocity, Arias intensity and significant duration predictive models from a pan-European strong-motion dataset vol.15, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0066-6
  7. Impact of earthquake ground motion characteristics on collapse risk of post-mainshock buildings considering aftershocks vol.81, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.047
  8. Development of duration-dependent damage-based inelastic response spectra vol.46, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2830
  9. Influence of earthquake ground-motion duration on damage estimation: application to steel moment resisting frames vol.46, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2769
  10. Ductility and Strength Reduction Factors for Degrading Structures Considering Cumulative Damage vol.2014, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/575816
  11. Influence of earthquake record truncation on fragility curves of RC frames with different damage indices vol.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.05.003
  12. Performance of Degrading Reinforced Concrete Frame Systems Under the Tohoku and Christchurch Earthquake Sequences vol.18, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2014.923796
  13. The effect of mainshock-aftershock on the residual displacement of buildings equipped with cylindrical frictional damper vol.12, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.5.515
  14. Average spectral acceleration: Ground motion duration evaluation vol.14, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.6.577
  15. Damage Concentration Effect of Multistory Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames vol.2019, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7164373
  16. An Optimal Seismic Force Pattern for Uniform Drift Distribution vol.9, pp.11, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9110231
  17. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) Reinforced Concrete Bridge Bents Under Long-Duration Motion vol.6, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.601736
  18. Normalized Residual Displacements for Bilinear and Pinching Oscillators vol.146, pp.11, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002809
  19. Study on normalization of residual displacements for single-degree-of-freedom systems vol.37, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020988014