Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance based optimal seismic retrofitting of yielding plane frames using added viscous damping

  • Lavan, O. (Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology) ;
  • Levy, R. (Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev)
  • Received : 2010.05.24
  • Accepted : 2010.08.08
  • Published : 2010.09.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the optimal seismic design of added viscous dampers in yielding plane frames. The total added damping is minimized for allowable values of local performance indices under the excitation of an ensemble of ground motions in both regular and irregular structures. The local performance indices are taken as the maximal inter-story drift of each story and/or the normalized hysteretic energy dissipated at each of the plastic hinges. Gradients of the constraints with respect to the design variables (damping coefficients) are derived, via optimal control theory, to enable an efficient first order optimization scheme to be used for the solution of the problem. An example of a ten story three bay frame is presented. This example reveals the following 'fully stressed characteristics' of the optimal solution: damping is assigned only to stories for which the local performance index has reached the allowable value. This may enable the application of efficient and practical analysis/redesign type methods for the optimal design of viscous dampers in yielding plane frames.

Keywords

References

  1. Agrawal, A.K. and Yang, J.N. (1999), "Design of passive energy dissipation systems based on LQR control methods", J. Intel. Mat. Syst. Str., 10(12), 933-944. https://doi.org/10.1106/FB58-N1DG-ECJT-B8H4
  2. Agrawal, A.K. and Yang, J.N. (1999), "Optimal placement of passive dampers on seismic and wind-excited buildings using combinatorial optimization", J. Intel. Mat. Syst. Str., 10(12), 997-1014. https://doi.org/10.1106/YV3B-TP5H-HWQ2-X1OK
  3. Attard, T.L. (2007). "Controlling all interstory displacements in highly nonlinear steel buildings using optimal viscous damping", J. Struct. Eng., 133(9), 1331-1340. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:9(1331)
  4. Aydin, E., Boduroglu, M.H. and Guney, D. (2007), "Optimal damper distribution for seismic rehabilitation of planar building structures", Eng. Struct., 29, 176-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.04.016
  5. Christopoulos, C. and Filiatrault, A. (2006), Principles of supplemental damping and seismic isolation, Milan, Italy, IUSS Press.
  6. Constantinou, M.C. and Tadjbakhsh, I.G. (1983), "Optimum design of a first story damping system", Comput. Struct., 17(2), 305-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(83)90019-6
  7. Dargush, G.F. and Sant, R.S. (2005), "Evolutionary aseismic design and retrofit of structures with passive energy dissipation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34, 1601-1626. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.497
  8. fujita, k., moustafa, a. and takewaki, i. (2010), optimal placement of viscoelastic dampers and supporting members under variable critical excitations. Earthq. Struct., 1(1), 43-67. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2010.1.1.043
  9. Gluck, N., Reinhorn, A.M., Gluck, J. and Levy, R. (1996), "Design of supplemental dampers for control of structures", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 122(12), 1394-1399. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:12(1394)
  10. Hahn, G.D. and Sathiavageeswaran, K.R. (1992), "Effects of added-damper distribution on the seismic response of buildings", Comput. Struct., 43(5), 941-950. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(92)90308-M
  11. Hwang, J.S. and Huang, Y.N. et al. (2008), "Design formulations for supplemental viscous dampers to building structures", J. Struct. Eng., 134(1), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:1(22)
  12. Kim, J. and Bang, S. (2002), "Optimum distribution of added viscoelastic dampers for mitigation of torsional responses of plan-wise asymmetric structures", Eng. Struct., 24(10), 1257-1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00046-9
  13. Kim, J., Choi, H. and Min, K.W. (2003), "Performance-based design of added viscous dampers using capacity spectrum method", J. Earthq. Eng., 7(1), 1-24.
  14. Lavan, O., Cimellaro, G.P. and Reinhorn, A.M. (2008), "Noniterative optimization procedure for seismic weakening and damping of inelastic structures", J. Struct. Eng., 134(10), 1638-1648. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:10(1638)
  15. Lavan, O. and Dargush, G.F. (2009), "Multi-objective optimal seismic retrofitting of structures", J. Earthq. Eng., 13, 758-790. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802598545
  16. Lavan, O. and Levy, R. (2005), "Optimal design of supplemental viscous dampers for irregular shear-frames in the presence of yielding", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34, 889-907. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.458
  17. Lavan, O. and Levy, R. (2006a), "Optimal design of supplemental viscous dampers for linear framed structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35, 337-356. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.524
  18. Lavan, O. and Levy, R. (2006b), "Optimal peripheral drift control of 3D irregular framed structures using supplemental viscous dampers", J. Earthq. Eng., 10(6), 903-923.
  19. Lavan, O. and Levy, R. (2009), "Simple iterative use of Lyapunov's solution for the linear optimal seismic design of passive devices in framed buildings", J. Earthq. Eng., 13(5), 650-666. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460902837736
  20. Levy, R. and Lavan, O. (2006), "Fully stressed design of passive controllers in framed structures for seismic loadings", J. Struct. Multidiscip. O., 32(6), 485-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-005-0558-5
  21. Levy, R. and Lavan, O. (2009), "Quantitative comparison of optimization approaches for the design of supplemental damping in earthquake engineering practice", J. Struct. Eng., 135(3), 321-325. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:3(321)
  22. Lin, Y.Y., Chang, K.C. and Chen, C.Y. (2008), "Direct displacement-based design for seismic retrofit of existing buildings using nonlinear viscous dampers", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 6, 535-552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-008-9062-9
  23. Liu, W., Tong, M. and Lee, G.C. (2005), "Optimization methodology for damper configuration based on building performance indices", J. Struct. Eng., 131(11), 1746-1756. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:11(1746)
  24. Liu, W., Tong, M., Wu. Y. and Lee, G.C. (2004), "Optimized damping device configuration design of a steel frame structure based on building performance indices", Earthq. Spectra, 20(1), 67-89. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1648334
  25. Loh, C.H., Lin, P.Y. and Chung, N.H. (2000), "Design of dampers for structures based on optimal control theory", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 29(9), 1307-1323. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9845(200009)29:9<1307::AID-EQE972>3.0.CO;2-D
  26. Lopez-Garcia, D. (2001) "A simple method for the design of optimal damper configurations in MDOF structures", Earthq. Spectra, 17(3), 387-398. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586180
  27. Ozdemir, H. (1976), Nonlinear transient dynamic analysis of yielding structures, Ph. D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
  28. Park, Y.J. and Ang, A.H.S. (1985), "Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete", J. Struct. Eng., 111(4), 722-739. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722)
  29. Park, J.H. kim, J. and Min, K.W. (2004), "Optimal design of added viscoelastic dampers and supporting braces", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33, 465-484. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.359
  30. Shen, K.L. and Soong, T.T. (1996), "Design of energy dissipation devices based on concept of damage control", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 122(1), 76-82. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:1(76)
  31. Shukla, A.K. and Datta, T.K. (1999), "Optimal use of viscoelastic dampers in building frames for seismic force", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 125(4), 401-409. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:4(401)
  32. Silvestri, S. and Trombetti, T. (2007), "Physical and numerical approaches for the optimal insertion of seismic viscous dampers in shear-type structures", J. Earthq. Eng., 11(5), 787-828. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460601034155
  33. Silvestri, S., Trombetti, T. and Ceccoli, C. (2003), "Inserting the mass proportional damping (MPD) system in a concrete shear-type structure", Struct. Eng. Mech., 16(2), 177-193. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2003.16.2.177
  34. Singh, M.P. and Moreschi, L.M. (2001), "Optimal seismic response control with dampers", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 30(4), 553-572. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.23
  35. Singh, M.P. and Moreschi, L.M. (2002), "Optimal placement of dampers for passive response control", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(4), 955-976. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.132
  36. Singh, M.P. Verma, N.P. and Moreschi, L.M. (2003), "Seismic analysis and design with Maxwell dampers", J. Eng. Mech., 129(3), 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:3(273)
  37. Sivaselvan, M.V. and Reinhorn, A.M. (2000), "Hysteretic models for deteriorating structures", J. Eng. Mech. - ASCE, 126, 633-640. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:6(633)
  38. Somerville, P., Smith, N., Punyamurthula, S. and Sun, J. (1997), "Development of ground motion time histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project", Report No. SAC/BD-97/04. The ground motions can be downloaded from: "http://quiver.eerc.berkeley.edu:8080/studies/system/ground_motions.html".
  39. Soong, T.T. (1990), Active structural control, Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, England.
  40. Soong, T.T and Dargush, G.F. (1997), Passive energy dissipation systems in structural engineering, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.
  41. Takewaki, I. (1997), "Optimal damper placement for minimum transfer function", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 26(11), 1113-1124. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199711)26:11<1113::AID-EQE696>3.0.CO;2-X
  42. Takewaki, I. (2000), "Optimal damper placement for critical excitation", Probabilist. Eng. Mech., 15(4), 317-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(99)00033-8
  43. Takewaki, I. (2000), "Optimal damper placement for planar building frames using transfer functions", Struct. Multidiscip. O., 20(4), 280-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001580050158
  44. Takewaki, I. and Uetani, K. (1999), "Optimal damper placement for building structures including surface ground amplification", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 18(5), 363-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(99)00007-X
  45. Takewaki, I. Yoshitomi, S. Uetani, K. and Tsuji, M (1999), "Non-monotonic optimal damper placement via steepest direction search", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28(6), 655-670. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199906)28:6<655::AID-EQE833>3.0.CO;2-T
  46. Takewaki, I. (2009), Building control with passive dampers: optimal performance-based design for earthquakes, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. (Asia), Singapore.
  47. Trombetti, T. and Silvestri, S. (2004), "Added viscous dampers in shear-type structures: the effectiveness of mass proportional damping", J. Earthq. Eng., 8(2), 275-313.
  48. Trombetti, T. and Silvestri, S. (2006), "On the modal damping ratios of shear-type structures equipped with Rayleigh damping systems", J. Sound Vib., 292, 21-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.07.023
  49. Trombetti, T. and Silvestri, S. (2007), "Novel schemes for inserting seismic dampers in shear-type systems based upon the mass proportional component of the Rayleigh damping matrix", J. Sound. Vib., 302(3), 486-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.11.030
  50. Uang, C.M. and Bertero, V.V. (1990), "Evaluation of seismic energy in structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 19(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290190108
  51. Uriz, P, and Whittaker, A.S. (2001), "Retrofit of pre-Northridge steel moment-resisting frames using fluid viscous dampers", Struct. Design Tall Build., 10, 371-390. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.199
  52. Valmundsson, V.E. and Nau, J.M. (1997), "Seismic response of building frames with vertical structural irregularities", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 123(12), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:1(30)
  53. Yang, J.N., Lin, S., Kim, J.H. and Agrawal, A.K. (2002), "Optimal design of passive energy dissipation systems based on H infinity and H2 performances", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(4), 921-936. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.130
  54. Zhang, R.H. and Soong, T.T. (1992), "Seismic design of viscoelastic dampers for structural applications", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 118(5), 1375-13 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1375)

Cited by

  1. A simple damper optimization algorithm for both target added damping ratio and interstorey drift ratio vol.5, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.5.1.083
  2. Optimality criteria based seismic design of multiple tuned-mass-dampers for the control of 3D irregular buildings vol.8, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.1.077
  3. Using an artificial bee colony algorithm for the optimal placement of viscous dampers in planar building frames vol.48, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0892-y
  4. Seismic retrofit of special truss moment frames using viscous dampers vol.123, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.04.027
  5. Adjoint sensitivity analysis and optimization of hysteretic dynamic systems with nonlinear viscous dampers 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1858-2
  6. Comparative experimental assessment of seismic rehabilitation with CFRP strips and sheets on RC frames vol.10, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.3.613
  7. Simultaneous optimal damper placement using oil, hysteretic and inertial mass dampers vol.5, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.5.3.261
  8. Gradient based optimal seismic retrofitting of 3D irregular buildings using multiple tuned mass dampers vol.139, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.03.002
  9. Optimal Design of Viscous Dampers and Their Supporting Members for the Seismic Retrofitting of 3D Irregular Frame Structures vol.141, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001261
  10. Seismic response of active or semi active control for irregular buildings based on eigenvalues modification vol.6, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.6.647
  11. Efficient Seismic Design of 3D Asymmetric and Setback RC Frame Buildings for Drift and Strain Limitation vol.143, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001689
  12. Optimization-based minimum-cost seismic retrofitting of hysteretic frames with nonlinear fluid viscous dampers vol.47, pp.15, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3118
  13. Free vibration analysis of tall buildings with outrigger-belt truss system vol.2, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2011.2.1.089
  14. Effectiveness of some conventional seismic retrofitting techniques for bare and infilled R/C frames vol.39, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.39.4.499
  15. Seismic design of a precast r.c. structure equipped with viscous dampers vol.2, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2011.2.3.297
  16. Seismic evaluation and upgrading of RC buildings with weak open ground stories vol.3, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2012.3.3_4.611
  17. Numerical verification of a dual system's seismic response vol.3, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2012.3.5.749
  18. A simplified design procedure for seismic retrofit of earthquake-damaged RC frames with viscous dampers vol.44, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.44.5.611
  19. A retrofitting method for torsionally sensitive buildings using evolutionary algorithms vol.12, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.3.309
  20. Zemin-yapı etkileşiminin betonarme bacaların dinamik davranışına etkisi vol.7, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.465732
  21. Hysteretic-Viscous Hybrid Damper System for Long-Period Pulse-Type Earthquake Ground Motions of Large Amplitude vol.6, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00062
  22. Multi-criteria performance-based optimization of friction energy dissipation devices in RC frames vol.18, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.2.185
  23. Comparison of different distributions of viscous damper properties in asymmetric-plan frames vol.18, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.2.233
  24. DEM Simulations of Energy Dissipation in Sand under Static and Cyclic Loading vol.49, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1520/jte20190829
  25. Comprehensive Review of Optimal and Smart Design of Nonlinear Building Structures With and Without Passive Dampers Subjected to Earthquake Loading vol.7, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.631114
  26. Optimal Seismic Design of Stiffness and Gap of Hysteretic-Viscous Hybrid Damper System in Nonlinear Building Frames for Simultaneous Reduction of Interstory Drift and Acceleration vol.7, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.656606
  27. Inverse optimal damper placement via shear model for elastic-plastic moment-resisting frames under large-amplitude ground motions vol.250, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113457