Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Using nonlinear static procedures for seismic assessment of the 3D irregular SPEAR building

  • Bento, R. (Instituto Superior Tecnico, Technical University of Lisbon) ;
  • Bhatt, C. (Instituto Superior Tecnico, Technical University of Lisbon) ;
  • Pinho, R. (Department of Structural Mechanics, University of Pavia)
  • Received : 2010.01.21
  • Accepted : 2010.03.04
  • Published : 2010.06.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper presents an appraisal of four nonlinear static procedures (CSM, N2, MPA and ACSM) employed in seismic assessment of plan-irregular buildings. It uses a three storey reinforced concrete plan-irregular frame building exemplifying typical older constructions of the Mediterranean region in the early 1970s that was tested in full-scale under bi-directional pseudo-dynamic loading condition at JRC, Ispra. The adequacy and efficiency of the simplified analytical modelling assumptions adopted were verified. In addition, the appropriate variants of code-prescribed NSPs (CSM and N2) to be considered for subsequent evaluation were established. Subsequent parametric studies revealed that all such NSPs predicted reasonably well both global and local responses, having the benchmark values been determined through nonlinear dynamic analyses using a suit of seven ground motions applied with four different orientations. The ACSM, however, predicted responses that matched slightly better the median dynamic results.

Keywords

References

  1. Antoniou, S. and Pinho, R. (2004), "Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure", J. Earthq. Eng., 8(5), 643-661.
  2. Applied Technology Council (ATC) (1996), Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, Vol. 1 and 2, Report No. ATC-40, Redwood City, CA.
  3. Applied Technology Council (ATC) (2008), Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures, FEMA 440 Report, Redwood City, CA.
  4. Bento, R. and Pinho, R. (2008), 3D pushover 2008: nonlinear static methods for design/assessment of 3D structure, IST Press, Lisbon, Portugal.
  5. Calabrese, A., Almeida, J. P. and Pinho, R. (2010), "Numerical issues in distributed inelasticity modeling of RC frame elements for seismic analysis", J. Earthq. Eng., 14(1). (in press)
  6. Casarotti, C., Bruno, V.I. and Pinho, R. (2007), "An adaptive capacity spectrum method for the assessment of reinforced concrete buildings", Proceedings of the 12th Italian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Pisa, Italy, 185. (in Italian)
  7. Casarotti, C. and Pinho, R. (2007), "An adaptive capacity spectrum method for assessment of bridges subjected to earthquake action", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 5(3), 377-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-007-9031-8
  8. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2002), "A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 31, 561-582. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.144
  9. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2004), "A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 33, 903-927. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.380
  10. Comite Europeen de Normalisation (CEN) (2004), Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, EN 1998-1:2004, Brussels, Belgium
  11. Comite Europeen de Normalisation (CEN) (2005), Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 2: bridges, EN 1998-2, Brussels, Belgium.
  12. Fajfar, P. (2000), "A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design", Earthq. Spectra, 16(3), 573-592. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586128
  13. Fajfar, P., Dolsek, M., Marusic, D. and Stratan, A. (2006), "Pre- and post-test mathematical modelling of a planasymmetric reinforced concrete frame building", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D. 35, 1359-1379. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.583
  14. Fajfar, P. and Fischinger, M. (1988), "N2 - a method for non-linear seismic analysis of regular buildings", Proceedings of the Ninth World Conference in Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, 5, 111-116.
  15. Fajfar, P., Marusic, D. and Perus, I. (2005), "Torsional effects in the pushover-based seismic analysis of buildings", J. Earthq. Eng., 9(6), 831-854.
  16. Fardis, M.N. (2002), "Design of an irregular building for the SPEAR project - description of the 3-storey structure", Research Report, University of Patras, Greece.
  17. Fardis, M.N. and Negro, P. (2006), "SPEAR - seismic performance assessment and rehabilitation of existing buildings", Proceedings of the International Workshop on the SPEAR Project, Ispra, Italy.
  18. Filippou, F.C., Popov, E.P. and Bertero, V.V. (1983), "Modelling of R/C joints under cyclic excitations", J. Struct. Eng., 109(11), 2666-2684. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1983)109:11(2666)
  19. Franchin, P., Lupoi, A., Pinto, P.E. and Schotanus, M.I.J. (2005), "Seismic fragility analysis of RC structures: use of response surface for a realistic application", Proceedings of the International Workshop on the SPEAR Project, Ispra, Italy.
  20. Freeman, S.A. (1998), "Development and use of capacity spectrum method", Proceedings of the Sixth U.S. National Conf. Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, Oakland, USA.
  21. Freeman, S.A., Nicoletti, J.P. and Tyrell, J.V. (1975), "Evaluation of existing buildings for seismic risk - a case study of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington", Proceedings of U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Berkley, USA, 113-122
  22. Jeong, S.H. and Elnashai, A.S. (2005), "Analytical assessment of the seismic performance of an irregular RC frame for full scale 3D pseudo-dynamic testing, Part I: analytical model verification", J. Earthq. Eng., 9(1), 95-128.
  23. Kalkan, E. and Kunnath, S.K. (2006), "Adaptive modal combination procedure for nonlinear static analysis of building structures", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 132(11), 1721-1731. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:11(1721)
  24. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N. and Park, R. (1998), "Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 114(8), 1804-1826.
  25. Martinez-Rueda, J.E. and Elnashai, A.S. (1997), "Confined concrete model under cyclic load", Mater. Struct., 30(197), 139-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02486385
  26. Meireles, H., Pinho, R., Bento, R. and Antoniou, S. (2006), "Verification of an adaptive pushover technique for the 3D case", Proceedings of 13th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Switzerland, 619.
  27. Menegotto, M. and Pinto, P.E. (1973), "Method of analysis for cyclically loaded RC plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behaviour of elements under combined normal force and bending", Symposium on the Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures anted on by well defined loads, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland, 15-22.
  28. Pinho, R., Bento, R. and Bhatt, C. (2008), "Assessing the 3D Irregular SPEAR building with nonlinear static procedures", Proceedings of the 14th Word Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, 05-01-0158.
  29. Pinho, R., Bhatt, C., Antoniou S. and Bento, R. (2008), "Modelling of the horizontal slab of a 3D irregular building for nonlinear static assessment", Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, 05-01-0159.
  30. Pinho, R., Marques, M., Monteiro, R. and Casarotti, C. (2008), "Using the adaptive capacity spectrum method for seismic assessment of irregular frames", Proceedings of the 5th European Workshop on the Seismic Behaviour of Irregular and Complex Structures, Catania, Italy, 21.
  31. Pinho, R., Monteiro, R., Casarotti, C. and Delgado, R. (2008), "Assessment of continuous span bridges through nonlinear static procedures", Earthq. Spectra. (in press)
  32. SeismoSoft (2006), "SeismoStruct - a computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures", Available online from URL: www.seismosoft.com.

Cited by

  1. Spectral reduction factors evaluation for seismic assessment of frame buildings vol.77, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.041
  2. An Improved Multidimensional MPA Procedure for Bidirectional Earthquake Excitations vol.2014, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/320756
  3. Evaluación probabilista del riesgo sísmico de estructuras con base en la degradación de rigidez vol.32, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rimni.2014.11.001
  4. Earthquake induced torsion in buildings: critical review and state of the art vol.8, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.2.305
  5. Predicting displacement demand of multi-storey asymmetric buildings by nonlinear static analysis and corrective eccentricities vol.99, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.006
  6. An adaptive modal pushover procedure for asymmetric-plan buildings vol.36, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.11.032
  7. An improved upper-bound pushover procedure for seismic assessment of high-rise moment resisting steel frames vol.16, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0204-9
  8. Seismic assessment of existing r.c. framed structures with in-plan irregularity by nonlinear static methods vol.8, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.2.401
  9. Probabilistic seismic damage assessment of reinforced concrete buildings considering directionality effects 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1385089
  10. Story shear and torsional moment-based pushover procedure for asymmetric-plan buildings using an adaptive capacity spectrum method vol.79, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.08.006
  11. Generalized corrective eccentricities for nonlinear static analysis of buildings with framed or braced structure vol.15, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0159-x
  12. A pushover procedure for seismic assessment of buildings with bi-axial eccentricity under bi-directional seismic excitation vol.69, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.10.018
  13. Improved capacity spectrum method with inelastic displacement ratio considering higher mode effects vol.7, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.4.587
  14. Extension of the CSM-FEMA440 to plan-asymmetric real building structures vol.40, pp.11, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1087
  15. The extended N2 method considering higher mode effects in both plan and elevation vol.10, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9319-6
  16. Assessing the seismic response of existing RC buildings using the extended N2 method vol.9, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9252-8
  17. Nonlinear static and dynamic analyses of reinforced concrete buildings - comparison of different modelling approaches vol.4, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.5.451
  18. Comparison of Nonlinear Static Methods for the Seismic Assessment of Plan Irregular Frame Buildings with Non Seismic Details vol.16, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2011.586085
  19. Probabilistic Seismic Assessment of RC Bridges: Part I — Uncertainty Models vol.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2015.08.002
  20. Comparison of nonlinear static methods for the assessment of asymmetric buildings vol.11, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9516-6
  21. Impact of using lightweight eco-bricks as enclosures for individual houses of one story on zones of high seismicity vol.67, pp.328, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3989/mc.2017.03316
  22. Nonlinear Static Seismic Performance Assessment of Plan-Irregular Steel Structures pp.1559-808X, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1469438
  23. An Efficient Methodology to Estimate Probabilistic Seismic Damage Curves vol.145, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002290
  24. Proposal of a Incremental Modal Pushover Analysis (IMPA) vol.13, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.6.539
  25. Effective Assessment of Inelastic Torsional Deformation of Plan-Asymmetric Shear Wall Systems vol.9, pp.14, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9142814
  26. Dynamic-Based Pushover Analysis for Two-Way Plan-Asymmetric Buildings under Bidirectional Seismic Excitation vol.146, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002501
  27. IMPAβ: Incremental Modal Pushover Analysis for Bridges vol.10, pp.12, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124287
  28. Torsional irregularity indices for the seismic demand assessment of RC moment resisting frame buildings vol.26, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.05.018
  29. Compliance-based estimation of seismic collapse risk of an existing reinforced concrete frame building vol.19, pp.14, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01215-9