DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effects of topography on local wind-induced pressures of a medium-rise building

  • Hitchcock, P.A. (CLP Power Wind/Wave Tunnel Facility, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kwok, K.C.S. (School of Engineering, University of Western Sydney) ;
  • Wong, K.S. (CLP Power Wind/Wave Tunnel Facility, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Shum, K.M. (CLP Power Wind/Wave Tunnel Facility, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2009.06.26
  • Accepted : 2010.03.06
  • Published : 2010.09.25

Abstract

Wind tunnel model tests were conducted for a residential apartment block located within the complex terrain of The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST). The test building is typical of medium-rise residential buildings in Hong Kong. The model study was conducted using modelling techniques and assumptions that are commonly used to predict design wind loads and pressures for buildings sited in regions of significant topography. Results for the building model with and without the surrounding topography were compared to investigate the effects of far-field and near-field topography on wind characteristics at the test building site and wind-induced external pressure coefficients at key locations on the building facade. The study also compared the wind tunnel test results to topographic multipliers and external pressure coefficients determined from nine international design standards. Differences between the external pressure coefficients stipulated in the various standards will be exacerbated when they are combined with the respective topographic multipliers.

Keywords

References

  1. American Society of Civil Engineers (2005), Minimum design loads for buildings and other Structures, SEI/ASCE 7-05, ASCE, Reston, VA.
  2. Architectural Institute of Japan (2004), Recommendations for loads on buildings, (in English), AIJ, Tokyo.
  3. British Standards Institution (1997), Loading for buildings – Part 2: Code of practice for wind loads, BS 6399-2, BSI, London, UK.
  4. Buildings Department (2004), Code of Practice on Wind Effects in Hong Kong, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong.
  5. China Architecture and Building Press (2006), Load code for the design of building structures, China National Standard, GB 50009-2001, CABP, Beijing, China.
  6. Chock, G.Y.K. and Cochran, L. (2006), Erratum to "Modeling of topographic wind speed effects in Hawaii", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 94(3), 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2005.12.001
  7. C.E.N. (European Committee for Standardization) (2005) Eurocode 1: Actions on structures - General actions - Part 1-4: Wind actions, prEN 1991-1-4.6, C.E.N., Brussels.
  8. Glanville, M.J. and Kwok, K.C.S. (1997), "Measurements of topographic multipliers and flow separation from a steep escarpment: Part II. Model-scale measurements", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 69-71, 893-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00215-8
  9. Holmes, J.D. (2007), Wind loading of structures, 2nd Edition, Taylor and Francis Group, London, UK.
  10. Holmes, J.D., Banks, R.W. and Paevere, P. (1997), "Measurements of topographic multipliers and flow separation from a steep escarpment. Part I. Full scale measurements", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 69-71, 885-892. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00214-6
  11. Holmes, J.D., Baker, C.J., English, E.C. and Choi, E.C.C. (2005), "Wind structure and codification", Wind Struct., 8(4), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2005.8.4.235
  12. Indian Standards Institution (1987), Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures, Part 3 Wind Loads, Second Revision, Indian Standard, IS 875: Part 3, India.
  13. Kondo, K., Tsuchiya, M. and Sanada, S. (2002), "Evaluation of effect of micro-topography on design wind velocity", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 90(12-15), 1707-1718. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00281-7
  14. Letchford, C.W., Holmes, J.D., Hoxey, R. and Robertson, A. (2005), "Wind pressure coefficients on low-rise structures and codification", Wind Struct., 8(4), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2005.8.4.283
  15. Miller, C.A. and Davenport, A.G. (1998), "Guidelines for the calculation of wind speed-ups in complex terrain", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 74-76, 189-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00016-6
  16. National Research Council of Canada (2005), User's Guide – NBC 2005 Structural Commentaries (Part 4 of Division B).
  17. St. Pierre, L.M., Kopp, G.A., Surry, D. and Ho T.C.E. (2005), "The UWO contribution to the NIST aerodynamic data base for wind loads on low buildings: Part 2. Comparison of data with wind load provisions", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 93, 31-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2004.07.007
  18. Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand (2002), Australia/New Zealand Standard, Structural design actions Part 2: Wind actions, AS/NZS 1170.2.
  19. Uematsu, Y. and Isyumov, N. (1999), "Wind pressures acting on low-rise buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 82(1-3), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(99)00036-7
  20. Weng, W., Taylor, P.A. and Walmsley, J.L. (2000), "Guidelines for airflow over complex terrain: model developments", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 86(2-3), 169-186.
  21. Zhang, X. (2003), "Introduction and some observations on 2002 Chinese Wind Load Code", Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Wind Engineering, Lubbock, Texas, USA, June.

Cited by

  1. Wind direction field under the influence of topography: part II: CFD investigations vol.22, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2016.22.4.477