Smart Structures and Systems

  • 제6권5_6호
  • /
  • Pages.423-438
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1738-1584(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1738-1991(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Flexible smart sensor framework for autonomous structural health monitoring

  • Rice, Jennifer A. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas Tech University) ;
  • Mechitov, Kirill (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) ;
  • Sim, Sung-Han (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) ;
  • Nagayama, Tomonori (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Tokyo) ;
  • Jang, Shinae (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) ;
  • Kim, Robin (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) ;
  • Spencer, Billie F. Jr. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) ;
  • Agha, Gul (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) ;
  • Fujino, Yozo (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Tokyo)
  • 투고 : 2009.11.13
  • 심사 : 2010.02.18
  • 발행 : 2010.07.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Wireless smart sensors enable new approaches to improve structural health monitoring (SHM) practices through the use of distributed data processing. Such an approach is scalable to the large number of sensor nodes required for high-fidelity modal analysis and damage detection. While much of the technology associated with smart sensors has been available for nearly a decade, there have been limited numbers of fulls-cale implementations due to the lack of critical hardware and software elements. This research develops a flexible wireless smart sensor framework for full-scale, autonomous SHM that integrates the necessary software and hardware while addressing key implementation requirements. The Imote2 smart sensor platform is employed, providing the computation and communication resources that support demanding sensor network applications such as SHM of civil infrastructure. A multi-metric Imote2 sensor board with onboard signal processing specifically designed for SHM applications has been designed and validated. The framework software is based on a service-oriented architecture that is modular, reusable and extensible, thus allowing engineers to more readily realize the potential of smart sensor technology. Flexible network management software combines a sleep/wake cycle for enhanced power efficiency with threshold detection for triggering network wide operations such as synchronized sensing or decentralized modal analysis. The framework developed in this research has been validated on a full-scale a cable-stayed bridge in South Korea.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : National Science Foundation

참고문헌

  1. Arms, S.W., Galbreath, J.H., Newhard, A.T. and Townsend, C.P. (2004), "Remotely reprogrammable sensors for structural health monitoring", Proceedings of the Structural Materials Technology (SMT): NDE/NDT for Highways and Bridges, Buffalo, NY, September.
  2. Cho, S., Jo, H., Jang, S., Park, J., Jung, H.J., Yun, C.B., Spencer, Jr., B.F. and Seo, J. (2010), "Structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge using smart sensor technology: data analysis", Smart Struct. Syst., 6(5-6), 461-480. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2010.6.5_6.461
  3. Colibrys Inc. (2007), Si-Flex SF1500S Accelerometer, Neuchatel, Switzerland.
  4. Crossbow Technology, Inc. (2007a), Imote2 Hardware Reference Manual, Available at http://www.xbow.com/ Support/Support_pdf_files/Imote2_Hardware_Reference_Manual.pdf.
  5. Crossbow Technology, Inc. (2007b), ITS400 - Imote2 Basic Sensor Board, Available at http://www.xbow.com/ Products/productdetails.aspx?sid=261.
  6. Gu, T., Pung, H.K. and Zhang, D.Q. (2005), "A service-oriented middleware for building context-aware services", J. Netw. Comput. Appl., 28(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2004.06.002
  7. Hogenauer, E.B. (1981), "An economical class of digital filters for decimation and interpolation", IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, 29(2), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASSP.1981.1163535
  8. Hui, J., Ren, Z. and Krogh, B.H. (2003), "Sentry-based power management in wireless sensor networks", Proceedings of the '03 Information Processing in Sensor Networks, Second International Workshop, Palo Alto, CA, USA, April.
  9. Jang, S., Jo, H., Cho, S., Mechitov, K., Rice, J.A., Sim, S.H., Jung, H.J., Yun, C.B., Spencer, Jr., B.F. and Agha, G. (2010), "Structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge using smart sensor technology: deployment and evaluation", Smart Struct. Syst., 6(5-6), 439-459. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2010.6.5_6.439
  10. Kurata, N., Saruwatari, S. and Morikawa, H. (2006), "Ubiquitous Structural Monitoring using Wireless Sensor Networks", Proceedings of the '06 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems, Tokyo, December.
  11. Levis, P., Madden, S., Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., Whitehouse, K., Woo, A., Gay, D., Hill, J., Welsh, M., Brewer, E. and Culler, D. (2005), TinyOS: An Operating System for Sensor Networks, Ambient Intelligence (Ed. Weber, W., Rabaey, J.M., Aarts, E.), Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  12. Liu, J. and Zhao, F. (2005), "Towards semantic services for sensor-rich information systems", Proceedings of the International Workshop on Broadband Advanced Sensor Networks, Boston, MA, October.
  13. Mechitov, K., Razavi, R. and Agha, G. (2007), "Architecture Design Principles to Support Adaptive Service Orchestration in WSN Applications", ACM SIGBED Review, 4(3), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1145/1317103.1317110
  14. Nagayama, T. and Spencer, Jr., B.F. (2007), Structural health monitoring using smart sensors, NSEL Report Series 001, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Available at https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/ 2142/3521.
  15. Nagayama, T., Rice, J.A. and Spencer, Jr., B.F. (2006), "Efficacy of Intel's Imote2 wireless sensor platform for structural health monitoring applications", Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Yokohama, Japan.
  16. Nagayama, T., Sim, S.H., Miyamori, Y. and Spencer, Jr., B.F. (2007), "Issues in structural health monitoring employing smart sensors", Smart Struct. Syst., 3(3), 299-320. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2007.3.3.299
  17. Pakzad, S.N., Fenves, G.L., Kim, S. and Culler, D.E. (2008), "Design and Implementation of Scalable Wireless Sensor Network for Structural Monitoring", J. Infrastruct. Syst., 14(1), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2008)14:1(89)
  18. Quickfilter Technologies, Inc. (2007), QF4A512 4-Channel Programmable Signal Conditioner, Allen, TX.
  19. Rice, J.A. and Spencer, Jr., B.F. (2009), Flexible Smart Sensor Framework for Autonomous Full-scale Structural Health Monitoring, NSEL Report Series 018, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Available at http:// www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/13635.
  20. Rice, J.A., Mechitov, K.A., Sim, S.H., Spencer, Jr., B.F. and Agha, G. (2010), "Enabling Framework for Structural Health Monitoring Using Smart Sensors", Struct. Control Health Monit., Published Online, Available at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/123320575/abstract.
  21. Silicon Designs, Inc. (2007), Model 1221 Low Noise Analog Accelerometer, Issaquah, WA.
  22. Sim, S.H. and Spencer, Jr., B.F. (2009), Decentralized Strategies for Monitoring Structures using Wireless Smart Sensor Networks, NSEL Report Series, 019, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Available at http:// www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/14280.
  23. Singh, M.P. and Huhns, M.N. (2005), Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents, John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey.
  24. STMicroelectronics (2008), LIS344ALH - ultracompact MEMS inertial sensor high performance 3-axis ${\pm}$2/${\pm}$6g ultracompact linear accelerometer, Available at http://www.st.com/stonline/books/pdf/docs/14337.pdf.
  25. Tsai, W.T. (2005), "Service-Oriented System Engineering: A New Paradigm", Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Service-Oriented System Engineering, October.
  26. Wang, L. and Xiao, Y. (2006), "A Survey of Energy-Efficient Scheduling Mechanisms in Sensor Networks", Mobile Netw. Appl., 11(5), 723-740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-006-7798-5
  27. Whelan, M.J and Janoyan, K.D. (2009), "Design of a Robust, High-rate Wireless Sensor Network for Static and Dynamic Structural Monitoring", J. Intel. Mat. Syst. Str., 20(7), 849-863. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X08098768
  28. Ye, W., Heidemann, J. and Estrin, D. (2002), "An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks", Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM), New York, NY, USA.

피인용 문헌

  1. Active Wireless System for Structural Health Monitoring Applications vol.17, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/s17122880
  2. Temperature-Compensated Damage Monitoring by Using Wireless Acceleration-Impedance Sensor Nodes in Steel Girder Connection vol.8, pp.9, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/167120
  3. Wireless health monitoring of stay cable using piezoelectric strain response and smart skin technique vol.12, pp.3_4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2013.12.3_4.381
  4. A Review of Distributed Optical Fiber Sensors for Civil Engineering Applications vol.16, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050748
  5. Long-Term Vibration Monitoring of Cable-Stayed Bridge Using Wireless Sensor Network vol.9, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/804516
  6. Vibration testing of a steel girder bridge using cabled and wireless sensors vol.5, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-011-0113-y
  7. Development of Wireless Smart Sensing Framework for Structural Health Monitoring of High-speed Railway Bridges vol.17, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.5.1
  8. Smart sensing, monitoring, and damage detection for civil infrastructures vol.15, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-011-0001-y
  9. Multiple Two-Way Time Message Exchange (TTME) Time Synchronization for Bridge Monitoring Wireless Sensor Networks vol.17, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/s17051027
  10. DETECTION OF DAMAGE LOCATION USING A NOVEL SUBSTRUCTURE-BASED FREQUENCY RESPONSE FUNCTION APPROACH WITH A WIRELESS SENSING SYSTEM vol.12, pp.04, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455412500290
  11. Internet-Enabled Wireless Structural Monitoring Systems: Development and Permanent Deployment at the New Carquinez Suspension Bridge vol.139, pp.10, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000609
  12. Impact of Reflow on the Output Characteristics of Piezoelectric Microelectromechanical System Devices vol.51, pp.9S1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.51.09LD11
  13. Middleware and communication technologies for structural health monitoring of critical infrastructures: A survey vol.56, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2017.09.007
  14. Sensor fusion for structural tilt estimation using an acceleration-based tilt sensor and a gyroscope vol.26, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aa84a0
  15. Survey on robotics and automation technologies for civil infrastructure vol.13, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.6.891
  16. Data-Efficient Quickest Change Detection with On–Off Observation Control vol.31, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/07474946.2012.651981
  17. SnowFort: An Open Source Wireless Sensor Network for Data Analytics in Infrastructure and Environmental Monitoring vol.14, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2014.2358253
  18. Comparison of Visual Inspection and Structural-Health Monitoring As Bridge Condition Assessment Methods vol.30, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000802
  19. Full-scale experimental validation of decentralized damage identification using wireless smart sensors vol.21, pp.11, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/21/11/115019
  20. An Autonomous Strain-Based Structural Monitoring Framework for Life-Cycle Analysis of a Novel Structure vol.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2016.00013
  21. A Recent Research Summary on Smart Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring vol.19, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2015.19.3.010
  22. Survey and Introduction to the Focused Section on Mechatronics for Sustainable and Resilient Civil Infrastructure vol.18, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2013.2283537
  23. Remote structural health monitoring systems for next generation SCADA vol.11, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2013.11.5.511
  24. RTEA: Real-Time and Energy Aware Routing for Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks vol.95, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4109-3
  25. A decentralized receptance-based damage detection strategy for wireless smart sensors vol.21, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/21/5/055017
  26. Dynamic and static structural displacement measurement using backscattering DC coupled radar vol.16, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.16.3.521
  27. Efficient multihop communication for static wireless sensor networks in the application to civil infrastructure monitoring vol.21, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1588
  28. Smart wireless sensing and assessment for civil infrastructure vol.10, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.769011
  29. An algorithm based on two-step Kalman filter for intelligent structural damage detection vol.22, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1712
  30. A Wireless Monitoring System for Cracks on the Surface of Reactor Containment Buildings vol.16, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/s16060883
  31. Compressed sensing embedded in an operational wireless sensor network to achieve energy efficiency in long-term monitoring applications vol.23, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/23/8/085014
  32. Traffic Safety Evaluation for Railway Bridges Using Expanded Multisensor Data Fusion vol.31, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12210
  33. Numerical Investigations into the Value of Information in Lifecycle Analysis of Structural Systems vol.2, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000850
  34. Compensation of temperature effect on impedance responses of PZT interface for prestress-loss monitoring in PSC girders vol.17, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2016.17.6.881
  35. Local dynamic characteristics of PZT impedance interface on tendon anchorage under prestress force variation vol.15, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.15.2.375
  36. Multiscale Acceleration-Dynamic Strain-Impedance Sensor System for Structural Health Monitoring vol.8, pp.10, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/709208
  37. Development of a Wireless Displacement Measurement System Using Acceleration Responses vol.13, pp.12, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/s130708377
  38. Design and calibration of a wireless laser-based optical sensor for crack propagation monitoring vol.15, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.15.6.1543
  39. Development of Flexible Cotton-Polystyrene Sensor for Application as Strain Gauge vol.16, pp.24, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2016.2618726
  40. Cluster-based optimal wireless sensor deployment for structural health monitoring 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921717689967
  41. Develoment of high-sensitivity wireless strain sensor for structural health monitoring vol.11, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2013.11.5.477
  42. A wireless smart sensor network for automated monitoring of cable tension vol.23, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/23/2/025006
  43. System identification of an in-service railroad bridge using wireless smart sensors vol.15, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.15.3.683
  44. An active mass damper system for structural control using real-time wireless sensors vol.19, pp.8, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1485
  45. Piezoelectric dynamic strain monitoring for detecting local seismic damage in steel buildings vol.22, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/11/115002
  46. Unique Activity-Meter with Piezoelectric Poly(vinylidene difluoride) Films and Self Weight of the Sensor Nodes vol.52, pp.9S1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.52.09KD15
  47. Piezoelectric MEMS switch to activate event-driven wireless sensor nodes vol.22, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/9/095001
  48. Contactless load monitoring in near-field with surface localized spoof plasmons—A new breed of metamaterials for health of engineering structures vol.244, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2016.04.037
  49. Modal Strain Energy-based Damage Monitoring in Beam Structures using PZT's Direct Piezoelectric Response vol.25, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7734/COSEIK.2012.25.1.091
  50. Proof of concept of wireless TERS monitoring vol.24, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2026
  51. Temperature effect on wireless impedance monitoring in tendon anchorage of prestressed concrete girder vol.15, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.15.4.1159
  52. Vibration-Based Monitoring of Stay-Cable Force Using Wireless Piezoelectric-Based Strain Sensor Nodes vol.32, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7779/JKSNT.2012.32.6.669
  53. Feasibility Study of Micro-Wind Turbines for Powering Wireless Sensors on a Cable-Stayed Bridge vol.5, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/en5093450
  54. A migration-based approach towards resource-efficient wireless structural health monitoring vol.27, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2013.08.003
  55. System identification of a cable-stayed bridge using vibration responses measured by a wireless sensor network vol.11, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2013.11.5.533
  56. Visual-inertial displacement sensing using data fusion of vision-based displacement with acceleration 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2122
  57. Enabling Reliable and Network-Wide Wakeup in Wireless Sensor Networks vol.15, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2015.2501800
  58. System identification of a historic swing truss bridge using a wireless sensor network employing orientation correction vol.22, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1672
  59. Vibration-based Structural Health Monitoring of Full-Scale Cable-Stayed Bridges Using Wireless Smart Sensors vol.12, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2012.12.1.075
  60. Resource-efficient wireless sensor network architecture based on bio-mimicry of the mammalian auditory system vol.26, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X14521877
  61. Real-time remote monitoring: the DuraMote platform and experiments towards future, advanced, large-scale SCADA systems vol.11, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.951861
  62. Next Generation Wireless Smart Sensors Toward Sustainable Civil Infrastructure vol.171, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.304
  63. Smart infrastructure: an emerging frontier for multidisciplinary research vol.170, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1680/jsmic.16.00002
  64. Vision-based remote 6-DOF structural displacement monitoring system using a unique marker vol.13, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.6.927
  65. Railroad bridge monitoring using wireless smart sensors vol.24, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1863
  66. An experimental study on self-powered vibration control and monitoring system using electromagnetic TMD and wireless sensors vol.180, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2012.04.011
  67. Wireless structural health monitoring of stay cables under two consecutive typhoons vol.1, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/smm.2014.1.1.047
  68. Review of Energy Harvesters Utilizing Bridge Vibrations vol.2016, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1340402
  69. Dynamic Displacement Estimation from Acceleration Measurements Using a Wireless Smart Sensor vol.558, pp.1662-9795, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.558.227
  70. Screen-printed nanocomposite sensors for online in situ structural health monitoring pp.1530-7980, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705718805131
  71. Signal selection and analysis methodology of long-term vibration data from the I-35W St. Anthony Falls Bridge vol.25, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2182
  72. Development of a tunable low-frequency vibration energy harvester and its application to a self-contained wireless fatigue crack detection sensor pp.1741-3168, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921718786886
  73. Wearable Wireless Sensor System With RF Remote Activation for Gas Monitoring Applications vol.18, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2018.2798925
  74. Structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge using smart sensor technology: deployment and evaluation vol.6, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2010.6.5_6.439
  75. Structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge using wireless smart sensor technology: data analyses vol.6, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2010.6.5_6.461
  76. Reliable multi-hop communication for structural health monitoring vol.6, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2010.6.5_6.481
  77. In-construction vibration monitoring of a super-tall structure using a long-range wireless sensing system vol.7, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2011.7.2.083
  78. Bio-inspired neuro-symbolic approach to diagnostics of structures vol.7, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2011.7.3.229
  79. Hybrid acceleration-impedance sensor nodes on Imote2-platform for damage monitoring in steel girder connections vol.7, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2011.7.5.393
  80. WiSeMote: a novel high fidelity wireless sensor network for structural health monitoring vol.10, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2012.10.3.271
  81. Energy harvesting and power management of wireless sensors for structural control applications in civil engineering vol.10, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2012.10.3.299
  82. Solar-powered multi-scale sensor node on Imote2 platform for hybrid SHM in cable-stayed bridge vol.9, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2012.9.2.145
  83. Performance evaluation of sensor networks by statistical modeling and euclidean model checking vol.9, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1145/2489253.2489256
  84. Analysis and minimization of power-transmission loss in locally daisy-chained systems by local energy buffering vol.18, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1145/2491477.2491481
  85. System identification of the suspension tower of Runyang Bridge based on ambient vibration tests vol.19, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2017.19.5.523
  86. Sudden Event Monitoring of Civil Infrastructure Using Demand-Based Wireless Smart Sensors vol.18, pp.12, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124480
  87. Vision-Based Modal Survey of Civil Infrastructure Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles vol.145, pp.7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002321
  88. Novel non-fiber optical metamaterial waveguide for monitoring canal and pipeline structures vol.9, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-019-00339-6
  89. Bayesian forecasting approach for structure response prediction and load effect separation of a revolving auditorium vol.24, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2019.24.4.507
  90. Development and full-scale validation of high-fidelity data acquisition on a next-generation wireless smart sensor platform vol.22, pp.16, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219866093
  91. Sequential algorithms for moving anomaly detection in networks vol.39, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1080/07474946.2020.1726678
  92. Smartphone-Based Bridge Seismic Monitoring System and Long-Term Field Application Tests vol.146, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002513
  93. Collaborative duty cycling strategies in energy harvesting sensor networks vol.35, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12522
  94. Development of Synchronized High-Sensitivity Wireless Accelerometer for Structural Health Monitoring vol.20, pp.15, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/s20154169
  95. Autonomous main-cable vibration monitoring using wireless smart sensors for large-scale three-pylon suspension bridges: A case study vol.39, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461348418813760
  96. Autonomous end-to-end wireless monitoring system for railroad bridges vol.1, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251-020-00014-7
  97. Vibration‐based piezoelectric, electromagnetic, and hybrid energy harvesters for microsystems applications: A contributed review vol.45, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/er.5643
  98. Optimal design of nonlinear energy sinks for mitigation of seismic response on structural systems vol.232, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111756
  99. Pipeline In-Line Inspection Method, Instrumentation and Data Management vol.21, pp.11, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21113862
  100. Aerial Tramway Sustainable Monitoring with an Outdoor Low-Cost Efficient Wireless Intelligent Sensor vol.13, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116340
  101. PDMS Sponges with Embedded Carbon Nanotubes as Piezoresistive Sensors for Human Motion Detection vol.11, pp.7, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11071740
  102. Performance of cement composite embeddable sensors for strain-based health monitoring of in-service structures vol.28, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2021.28.2.181
  103. Structural health monitoring using wireless smart sensor network – An overview vol.163, pp.None, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108113