DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Structural monitoring of wind turbines using wireless sensor networks

  • Swartz, R. Andrew (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technological University) ;
  • Lynch, Jerome P. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan) ;
  • Zerbst, Stephan (Institute for Structural Analysis, Leibniz University of Hanover) ;
  • Sweetman, Bert (Department of Maritime Systems Engineering, Texas A&M Galveston) ;
  • Rolfes, Raimund (Institute for Structural Analysis, Leibniz University of Hanover)
  • 투고 : 2008.05.01
  • 심사 : 2009.07.01
  • 발행 : 2010.04.25

초록

Monitoring and economical design of alternative energy generators such as wind turbines is becoming increasingly critical; however acquisition of the dynamic output data can be a time-consuming and costly process. In recent years, low-cost wireless sensors have emerged as an enabling technology for structural monitoring applications. In this study, wireless sensor networks are installed in three operational turbines in order to demonstrate their efficacy in this unique operational environment. The objectives of the first installation are to verify that vibrational (acceleration) data can be collected and transmitted within a turbine tower and that it is comparable to data collected using a traditional tethered system. In the second instrumentation, the wireless network includes strain gauges at the base of the structure. Also, data is collected regarding the performance of the wireless communication channels within the tower. In both turbines, collected wireless sensor data is used for off-line, output-only modal analysis of the ambiently (wind) excited turbine towers. The final installation is on a turbine with embedded braking capabilities within the nacelle to generate an "impulse-like" load at the top of the tower. This ability to apply such a load improves the modal analysis results obtained in cases where ambient excitation fails to be sufficiently broad-band or white. The improved loading allows for computation of true mode shapes, a necessary precursor to many conditional monitoring techniques.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Clayton, E.H., Lu, C., Koh, B.H., Xing, G. and Fok, C.L. (2005), "Damage detections and correlation-based localization using wireless mote sensors", Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, ISIC '05 and the 13th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, MED '05, Limassol, Cyprus.
  2. DOE (2006), Wind Energy Multiyear Program Plan for 2007-2012, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Washington D.C.
  3. Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R. and Cornwell, P.J. (1997), "DIAMOND: a graphical interface toolbox for comparative modal analysis and damage identification", Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Recent Advances in Structural Dynamics, Southampton, U.K.
  4. Feng, M. (2009), "Application of structural health monitoring in civil infrastructure", Smart Struct. Syst., 5(4), 469-482. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2009.5.4.469
  5. Hau, E. (2006), Wind Turbines: Fundamentals, Technologies, Application and Economics, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
  6. Holmes, J.D. (2007), Wind Loading of Structures, Taylor and Francis, New York, NY.
  7. Kijewski-Correa, T. and Su, S. (2009), "BRAIN: A bivariate data-driven approach to damage detection in multiscale wireless sensor networks", Smart Struct. Syst., 5(4), 415-426. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2009.5.4.415
  8. Kurata, N., Spencer, Jr., B.F. and Ruiz-Sandoval, M. (2005), "Risk monitoring of buildings with wireless sensor networks", Struct. Health Monit., 12(3), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.73
  9. Leopold, G. (2007), U.S. wind power is rising, but will it fly?, EE Times, June.
  10. Lynch, J.P. and Loh, K.J. (2006), "A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring", Shock Vib. Digest, 38(2), 91-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0583102406061499
  11. Lynch, J.P., Sundararajan, A., Law, K.H., Kiremidjian, A.S. and Carryer, E. (2004), "Embedding damage detection algorithms in a wireless sensing unit for attainment of operational power efficiency", Smart Mater. Struct., 13(4), 800-810. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/13/4/018
  12. Lynch, J.P., Sundararajan, A., Law, K.H., Kiremidjian, A.S., Carryer, E., Sohn, H. and Farrar, C.R. (2003), "Field Validation of a wireless structural monitoring system on the Alamosa Canyon Bridge", Proceedings of the SPIE, 5057, 267-278.
  13. Nagayama, T., Spencer, Jr., B.F. and Rice, J.A. (2007), "Structural health monitoring utilizing Intel's Imote2 wireless sensor platform", Proceedings of the SPIE--Sensors Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2007, 6529(2), 6592943.
  14. Pakzad, S.N., Fenves, G.L., Kim, S. and Culler, D.E. (2008), "Design and implementation of scalable wireless sensor network for structural monitoring", J. Infrastruct. Syst., 14(1), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2008)14:1(89)
  15. Pitchford, C., Grisso, B.L. and Inman, D.J. (2007), "Impedance-based structural health monitoring of wind turbine blades", Proceedings of the SPIE, 6532, 653211-1-653211-11.
  16. Rolfes, R., Gerasch, G., Haake, G., Reetz, J. and Zerbst, S. (2006), "Early damage detection system for tower and rotor blades of offshore wind turbines", Proceedings of the 3rd European, Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Granada, Spain.
  17. Rolfes, R., Zerbst, S., Haake, G., Reetz, J. and Lynch, J.P. (2007), "Integral SHM-system for offshore wind turbines using smart wireless sensors", Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA.
  18. Schulz, M.J. and Sundaresan, M.J. (2006), Smart Sensor System for Structural Condition Monitoring of Wind Turbines, Technical Report NREL/SR-500-40089, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
  19. Southern, A. (2007), Michigan goes green, dBusiness, November.
  20. Straser, E. and Kiremidjian, A.S. (1998), Modular, Wireless Damage Monitoring System for Structures, Technical Report 128, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford, CA.
  21. Tanner, N.A., Farrar, C.R. and Sohn, H. (2002), "Structural health monitoring using wireless sensing system with embedded processing", Proceedings of the SPIE, 4704, 215-224.
  22. Tweedie, K. (2005), Wind farm fears as blade snaps, The Times, April.
  23. Wang, Y., Lynch, J.P. and Law, K.H. (2007), "A wireless structural health monitoring system with multithreaded sensing devices: design and validation", Struct. Infrastruct. E., 3(2), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470600590820
  24. Whelan, M.J., Gangone, M.V., Janoyan, K.D., Cross, K. and Jha, R. (2007), "Reliable high-rate bridge monitoring using dense wireless sensor arrays", Proceedings of the International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA.
  25. Wiser, R. and Bolinger, M. (2007), Annual Report on U.S. Wind Power Installation, Costruction and Performance Trends: 2006, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Washington D.C.
  26. Zimmerman, A.T., Shiraishi, M., Swartz, R.A. and Lynch, J.P. (2008), "Automated modal parameter estimation by parallel processing within wireless monitoring systems", J. Infrastruct. Syst., 14(1), 102-113. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2008)14:1(102)

피인용 문헌

  1. Solar Driven Wind Speed Monitoring System Using Wireless or Wired Sensors vol.06, pp.09, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2014.69019
  2. Development of temperature-robust damage factor based on sensor fusion for a wind turbine structure vol.9, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-014-0285-3
  3. Structural Health Monitoring Using Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comprehensive Survey vol.19, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2691551
  4. Development of a High-Sensitivity Wireless Accelerometer for Structural Health Monitoring vol.18, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/s18010262
  5. Apache Spark a Big Data Analytics Platform for Smart Grid vol.21, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2015.10.085
  6. Damage detection in a composite wind turbine blade using 3D scanning laser vibrometry vol.231, pp.16, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406216679612
  7. Routing in wireless sensor networks for wind turbine monitoring vol.39, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2017.04.007
  8. Structural Monitoring Techniques for the Largest Excavation Section Subsea Tunnel: Xiamen Xiang’an Subsea Tunnel vol.30, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000594
  9. Long-Term Modal Analysis of Wireless Structural Monitoring Data from a Suspension Bridge under Varying Environmental and Operational Conditions: System Design and Automated Modal Analysis vol.143, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001198
  10. Monitoring a 5MW offshore wind energy converter—Condition parameters and triangulation based extraction of modal parameters vol.40, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.04.004
  11. Structural health monitoring of offshore wind turbines: A review through the Statistical Pattern Recognition Paradigm vol.64, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.085
  12. Structural Response of a Commercial Wind Turbine to Various Stopping Events vol.36, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1260/0309-524X.36.5.553
  13. Energy efficiency strategy for a general real-time wireless sensor platform vol.14, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.14.4.617
  14. Truck-based mobile wireless sensor networks for the experimental observation of vehicle–bridge interaction vol.20, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/20/6/065009
  15. Wireless MEMS-Based Accelerometer Sensor Boards for Structural Vibration Monitoring: A Review vol.17, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2016.2630008
  16. Structural integrity monitoring of onshore wind turbine concrete foundations vol.83, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.05.006
  17. Sensor Measurement Strategies for Monitoring Offshore Wind and Wave Energy Devices vol.628, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/628/1/012117
  18. The Hurst Exponent as an Indicator of the Behaviour of a Model Monopile in an Ocean Wave Testing Basin vol.628, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/628/1/012057
  19. Implementation of Small-Scale Wind Turbine Monitoring and Control System Based on Wireless Sensor Network vol.40, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7840/kics.2015.40.9.1808
  20. Structural monitoring of a wind turbine steel tower - Part I: system description and calibration vol.15, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2012.15.4.285
  21. Multiscale modeling of PVDF matrix carbon fiber composites vol.25, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/aa6a8a
  22. An integrated monitoring system for life-cycle management of wind turbines vol.12, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2013.12.2.209
  23. Bi-axial neutral axis tracking for damage detection in wind-turbine towers vol.19, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1856
  24. Damage detection on mesosurfaces using distributed sensor network and spectral diffusion maps vol.27, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/27/4/045110
  25. Damage prediction for wind turbines using wireless sensor and actuator networks vol.80, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2016.12.027
  26. Remotely monitoring offshore wind turbines via ZigBee networks embedded with an advanced routing strategy vol.5, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4773467
  27. Peel resistance of adhesive joints with elastomer–carbon black composite as surface sensing membranes vol.58, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.01.001
  28. A computational framework for life-cycle management of wind turbines incorporating structural health monitoring vol.12, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921713493344
  29. Load monitoring for active control of wind turbines vol.41, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.029
  30. Dynamic Responses of a Scaled Tension Leg Platform, Wind Turbine Support Structure in a Wave Tank vol.569-570, pp.1662-9795, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.569-570.563
  31. A Time-Interleave-Based Power Management System with Maximum Power Extraction and Health Protection Algorithm for Multiple Microbial Fuel Cells for Internet of Things Smart Nodes vol.8, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app8122404
  32. Development of a High-Sensitivity Optical Accelerometer for Low-Frequency Vibration Measurement vol.18, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092910
  33. Health Monitoring and Safety Evaluation of the Offshore Wind Turbine Structure: A Review and Discussion of Future Development vol.11, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020494
  34. Bio-inspired sensing and actuating architectures for feedback control of civil structures vol.14, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ab033b
  35. Dynamic response signatures of a scaled model platform for floating wind turbines in an ocean wave basin vol.373, pp.2035, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0078
  36. A fully-decentralized semantic mechanism for autonomous wireless sensor nodes vol.61, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2015.11.001
  37. Ad-hoc vibration monitoring system for a stress-ribbon footbridge: from design to operation vol.22, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2018.22.1.013
  38. Wireless High-Resolution Acceleration Measurements for Structural Health Monitoring of Wind Turbine Towers vol.3, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41688-018-0029-y
  39. Field Testing of Wind Turbine Towers with Contact and Noncontact Vibration Measurement Methods vol.34, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001366
  40. Optimized Node Deployment in Wireless Sensor Network for Smart Grid Application vol.111, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06925-7
  41. Support condition monitoring of offshore wind turbines using model updating techniques vol.19, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921719875628
  42. Design and Validation of a Scalable, Reconfigurable and Low-Cost Structural Health Monitoring System vol.21, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020648
  43. Review of Structural Health Monitoring Techniques in Pipeline and Wind Turbine Industries vol.4, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4030059
  44. Measurement of Acceleration Response Functions with Scalable Low-Cost Devices. An Application to the Experimental Modal Analysis vol.21, pp.19, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196637
  45. Health Monitoring and Diagnosis System for a Small H-Type Darrieus Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine vol.14, pp.21, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217246