Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on behavior of T-section modular composite profiled beams

  • Ryu, Soo-Hyun (Department of Architectural, Sahm-Yook University)
  • Received : 2010.03.10
  • Accepted : 2010.08.25
  • Published : 2010.09.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, specimens were made with profile thicknesses and shear reinforcement as parameters. The bending and shear behavior were checked, and comparative analysis was conducted of the results and the theoretical values in order to see the applicability of T-section Modular Composite Profiled Beams (TMPB). In TMPB, the profiles of formwork functions play a structural role resisting the load. Also, the module concept, which is introduced into TMPB, has advantages: it can be mass-produced in a factory, it is lighter than an existing H-beam, it can be fabricated on the spot, and its section size is freely adjustable. The T1 specimens exhibited ductile behavior, where the whole section displayed strain corresponding to yielding strain at least without separation between modules. They also exhibited maximum strength similar to the theoretical values even if shear reinforcement was not applied, due to the marginal difference between shear strength and maximum bending monment of the concrete section. A slip between modules was incurred by shear failure of the bolts in all specimens, excluding the T1 specimen, and therefore bending moment could not be fully displayed.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF)

References

  1. ACI Committee 318 (2005), Building code requirement for structural concrete (318-05) and Commentary (318R-05) American Concrete Institute.
  2. Ahmed, M., Oehlers, D.J. and Bradford, M.A. (2000), "Retrofitting reinforced concrete beams by bolting steel plates to their sides. Part 1: Behavior and experiments," Struct. Eng. Mech., 10(3), 211-226. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2000.10.3.211
  3. Bencardino, F., Spadea, G and Swamy, R.N. (2002), "Streng and ductility of reinforced concrete beams externally reinforced with carbon fiber fabric," ACI Struct. J., 99(2), 163-171
  4. Brian Uy and Andrew Bradford (1995), "Ductility of profile beams. Part I: Experimental study," J. Struct. Eng-ASCE, 121(5), 876-882. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:5(876)
  5. Brian Uy and Andrew Bradford (1995), "Ductility of profile beams. Part II: Analytical study," J. Struct. Eng-ASCE, 121(5), 883-889. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:5(883)
  6. Hyung-Joon Ahn and Soo-Hyun Ryu (2007), "Experimental study on flexural strength of modular composite profile beams," Steel. Conpos. Struct., 7(1), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2007.7.1.071
  7. Hyung-Joon Ahn and Soo-Hyun Ryu (2008), "Experimental study on flexural strength of reinforced modular composite profiled beams," Steel. Conpos. Struct., 8(4), 313-328. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2008.8.4.313
  8. Minglan Peng and Zhifei Shi (2004), "Interface characteristics of RC beams strengthened with FRP plate struct," Struct. Eng. Mech., 18(3), 315-330. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2004.18.3.315
  9. Oehlers D.J. (1993), "Composite profile beams," J. Struct. Eng-ASCE, 119(4), 1085-1100. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:4(1085)
  10. Oehlers D.J., Wright H.D. and Burnet M.J. (1994), "Flexural strength of profile beams," J. Struct. Eng-ASCE, 120(2), 378-393. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:2(378)
  11. Oehlers, D.J., Ahmed, M., Nguyen N.T. and Bradford, M.A.(1997), "Transverse and longitudinal partial interaction in composite bolted side-plated reinforced concrete beams," Struct. Eng. Mech., 5(5), 553-563. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.1997.5.5.553
  12. Oehlers, D.J., Ninh T Nguyen and Bradford, M.A. (2000), "Retrofitting by adhesive bonding steel plates to sides of R.C. beams. Part 1: Debonding of plates due to flexure," Struct. Eng. Mech., 9(5), 491-503. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2000.9.5.491
  13. Oehlers, D.J., Ninh T Nguyen and Bradford, M.A. (2000), "Retrofitting by adhesive bonding steel plates to sides of R.C. beams. Part 2: Debonding of plates due to shear and design rules," Struct. Eng. Mech., 9(5), 505-518. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2000.9.5.505
  14. Oehlers, D.J., Ahmed, M., Nguyen N.T. and Bradford, M.A. (2000), "Retrofitting reinforced concrete beams by bolting steel plates to their sides. Part 2: Transverse interaction and rigid plastic design," Struct. Eng. Mech., 10(3), 227-243. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2000.10.3.227
  15. Sang Hun Kim and Riyad S. Aboutaha, (2004), "Ductility of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) strengthened reinforced concrete beams: Experimental investigation," Steel. Conpos. Struct., 4(5), 333-353. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2004.4.5.333

Cited by

  1. Experimental study on mechanical performance of checkered steel-encased concrete composite beam vol.143, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.12.021
  2. Cracking of a prefabricated steel truss-concrete composite beam with pre-embedded shear studs under hogging moment vol.21, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.21.5.981
  3. Investigation on the flexural behavior of an innovative U-shaped steel-concrete composite beam vol.34, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.34.3.441