Korean Journal of Human Ecology (한국생활과학회지)

Korean Association of Human Ecology (한국생활과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clothing Behavior by Value Group of Baby Clothes Purchasers

유아복 구매자들의 가치집단에 따른 의복구매행동

  • Park, Ok-Lyun (Dept. of Fashion Design & Merchandising, Kyung-Sung University) ;
  • Lee, Ji-Na (Dept. of Fashion Design & Merchandising, Kyung-Sung University)
  • Received : 2009.10.05
  • Accepted : 2009.12.06
  • Published : 2010.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research subdivided the groups of baby clothes purchasers by consumer value factors in order to study clothing behavior by the value group of baby clothes purchasers and to examine differences in shopping propensity, pursuit benefits, evaluation criteria, and utilization of information sources depending on the value groups 1. A total of three factors - the pursuit of a stable life, the pursuit of achievement, and the pursuit of pleasure - were derived by conducting a factor analysis on the value dimensions of baby clothes purchasers. The value types of baby clothes purchasers were classified into three groups - the group of the pursuit of achievement, the group of the pursuit of stability and pleasure, and the passive group as the result of conducting cluster analysis on the basis of three types of personal value factors. 2. In the difference of shopping propensity by the value group, the group of the pursuit of achievement and the group of the pursuit of stability and pleasure were found to be the group having economical shopping propensity. In the difference of pursuit benefits by the value group, the passive group appeared to be the group in pursuit of fashion, and it could be seen that the group of the pursuit of achievement and the group of the pursuit of stability and pleasure were highly interested in the pursuit of individuality and practicality. 3. In the evaluation criteria of clothes by the value group of baby clothes purchasers, the group of the pursuit of achievement was found to consider physical criteria as important evaluation criteria, and the group of the pursuit of stability and pleasure was found to consider aesthetic criteria as important evaluation criteria. In the utilization of information sources by the value group of baby clothes purchasers, the passive group was found to be influenced most by market-oriented information sources.

Keywords

References

  1. 고애란, 홍희숙. (1995). 의류제품에 대한 혜택세분화와 정보원 사용 및 상점선택행연구. 한국의류학회지, 19(5), 811-825.
  2. 김미영. (1989). 생활양식유형과 의복평가기준에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 박사학위논문.
  3. 김세희. (2005). 의복쇼핑성향의 개념적 구조모형에 대한 타당성 확인연구 -성별에 따른 세부 구조차이를 중심으로-. 한국의류학회지, 29(3/4), 535-546.
  4. 김소영 (1994). 소비자의 의복쇼핑성향과 점포애고행동에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 석사학위논문.
  5. 김지현, 홍금희. (2000). 남성집단의 의복추구혜택에 따른 쇼핑성향과 정보원에 관한 연구. 한국의류학회지, 24(1), 43-54.
  6. 김혜진. (2004). 라이프스타일에 따른 의복소비행동 차이 연구 : 서울과 부산을 중심으로. 연세대학교 석사학위논문.
  7. 류은정. (1997). 수단-목표이론에 의한 의류제품평가과정에 관한 연구. 이화여자대학교 박사학위논문.
  8. 류은정, 임숙자. (1998). 소비자 가치체계와 의복행동에 관한 연구. 한국의류학회지, 22(6), 749-759.
  9. 박나리. (2006). 의류제품 구매자의 선호상표 및 추구혜택에 따른 제품평가 기준 및 의복이미지에 관한 연구. 한양대학교 석사학위논문.
  10. 박옥련, 이지나. (2009). 유아복 구매시 추구혜택에 따른 유아복 구매행동 연구. 한국생활과학회지, 18(4), 923-932.
  11. 박은미. (2003). 아동복 주부소비자의 쇼핑성향과 정보원활용에 관한 연구. 동덕여자대학교 석사학위논문.
  12. 박은주. (1992). 의복구매에 관련된 상황변수연구. 서울대학교 박사학위논문.
  13. 박재옥, 이은경. (2005). 의류쇼핑성향에 따른 점포 내 환경에 대한 인지적･감정적･행동적 반응. 한국의류학회지, 29(8), 1196-1206.
  14. 박현미. (2007). 심리적 의복추구혜택에 따른 파티의류제품정보원과 평가기준. 서울대학교 석사학위논문.
  15. 백선영. (1999). 청소년 소비가치가 의류제품 평가에 미치는 영향. 숙명여자대학교 박사학위논문.
  16. 백은주. (1995). 사용상황과 사회경제적 변인이 유아복 제품평가기준과 정보원활용에 미치는 영향. 한양대학교석사학위논문.
  17. 서은희. (1995). 소비자의 의복쇼핑성향 - 의복관여, 지속적 정보탐색 및 의복구매행동과의 관련을 중심으로-. 충남대학교 석사학위논문.
  18. 서현수. (2004). 30~40대 여성의 라이프스타일과 의복구매 행동. 서울여자대학교 석사학위논문.
  19. 송영진. (2004). 어머니의 의복소비성향이 유아복 구매행동에 미치는 영향. 숙명여자대학교 석사학위논문.
  20. 신승현. (2007). 2635세대의 의복쇼핑성향 및 의복구매동기에 관한 연구 -여가행동 참여 정도를 중심으로-. 이화여자대학교 석사학위논문.
  21. 신지혜. (1998). 성인여성의 의복쇼핑성향과 정보탐색에 관한 연구 -20대이상 성인여성-. 숙명여자대학교 석사학위논문.
  22. 안광호, 황선진, 정찬진. (1999). 패션마케팅. 수학사.
  23. 안소현, 서용한, 서문식. (2000). 의류구매자의 가치관 -추구 혜택-제품속성간의 계층적 인과관계에 관한 탐색적 연구. 한국의류학회지, 24(5), 652-662.
  24. 연보라. (2005). 의복추구혜택과 점포선택기준에 관한 연구.성균관대학교 석사학위논문.
  25. 옥경은. (2000). 상황과 소비자 특성에 따른 의류제품의 추구혜택과 정보원 활용에 관한 연구. 한양대학교 석사학위논문.
  26. 유희. (1995). 소비자의 가치의식과 의류제품평가. 서울대학교 석사학위논문.
  27. 이은영. (1997). 패션마케팅 제2판. 교문사
  28. 임경복. (1998). 의복구매시 정보탐색 활동에 관한 연구 - 자아이미지와 추구편익을 중심으로-. 한국의류학회지, 22(1), 61-71
  29. 정강형. (1993). 소비자행동에 영향을 미치는 소비자 가치에 대한 연구 -교차문화적 비교연구를 중심으로-. 서울대학교 석사학위논문.
  30. 최수현. (1996). 미혼여성의 가치관과 의복쇼핑성향에 관한 연구. 이화여자대학교 석사학위논문.
  31. 황진숙. (2003). 인터넷 의류구매 대학생의 가치가 의복추구혜택에 미치는 영향. 한국의류학회지, 27(1), 154-161.
  32. VIP 위에 VIB(2009, 1. 10) 조선일보, p. 7.
  33. Cox, D. F. (1967). Risk Handling in Consumer Behavior: An Intensive Study of Tow Cases, in Cox, D.F. ed., Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Boston: Harvard University Press.
  34. Jenkins, M., & Dickey, L. (1976). Consumer types based on evaluative criteria underlying clothing decisions. Home Economics Research Journal, 4, 156-162.
  35. Eckman, M., Damhorst, M. L., & Kadolph, S. J. (1990). Toward a model of the in-store purchase decision process consumer use of criteria for evaluating women's apparel. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(2), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9000800202
  36. Gutman, J. (1982). A means-end chain model based onconsumer categorization processes. Journal of Marketing, 46(1), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.2307/3203341
  37. Gutman, J., & Mills, M. K. (1982). Fashion life style, self-concept, shopping orientation and store patronage and integrative analysis. Journal of Retailing, 58(2), 64-86.
  38. Hawkins, D. L., Best, R. J., & Cony, K. A. (1989). Consumer Behavior: Implications for Marketing Stratrgy(4th ed). Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
  39. Homer, R. H., & Kahle, L. R. (1988). A structural equation test of the value attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 638-646. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.638
  40. Howell, R. D. (1979). A Multiveriate Examination of A Patronage Model: The Impact of Values and Life Style on Shopping Orientations, Unpublished doctorial dissertation, University of Akansas.
  41. Jenkins, M., & Dickey, L. (1976). Consumer types based on evaluative criteria underlying clothing decisions, Home Economics Research Journal, 4(3), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X7600400301
  42. Kahle, L .R. (1983). Social Values and Social Change. New York: Praeger.
  43. Kamakura, W. A., & T. P. Novak (1992). Value-system segmentation: Exploring the meaning of LOV. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1086/209291
  44. Lai, A. W. (1995). Consumer values, product benefits and customer value: A consumption behavior approach. Advances in Consumer Research, 22, 381-388.
  45. Moschis, G. P. (1976). Shopping orientations and consumer uses of information. Journal of Retailing, 52(2), 61-70.
  46. Morganosky, M. A. (1984). Aesthetic and utilitarian qualities of clothing. Home Economics Research Journal, 13(1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X8401300103
  47. Shim, S., & Bickle, M. C. (1994). Benefit segments of the female Apparel market: Psychographics, shopping orientations, and demographics. Clothingand Textile Research, 12(2), 1-12 https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9401200201
  48. Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Value. New York: Free Press.
  49. Shim, S., & Kotsiopulos, A. (1992). Patronage behavior of apparel shopping:Part I. shopping orientation, store attributes, information sources, and personal characteristics. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10(2). 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9201000209
  50. Shim, S., & Kotsiopulos, A. (1993). A typology of apparel shopping orientation segments among female consumers. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12(1), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9301200110
  51. Stone, G. P. (1954). City shoppers and urban identification: observation on the social psychology of city life. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1086/221483
  52. Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (1987). Consumer Behavior: Marketing Strategy Prespectiver, Homewood, Illinois: Irwin.
  53. Rao, A. R., & Sieben, W. A. (1992). The effect of prior knowledge price acceptability and the type of information examined. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 256-270. https://doi.org/10.1086/209300
  54. Zeithmal, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value; A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446

Cited by

  1. Evaluation Criteria and Image-Tone Preference of Infant and Children's Wear according to Buyer's Value vol.35, pp.9, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2011.35.9.1060
  2. Children's Wear Purchasing Behavior by Retired Women and the Missy Group with a View to their Shopping Orientation vol.36, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2012.36.1.84
  3. The Effects of Mothers' Childrearing Attitudes on Consumer Socialization and the Evaluation of Children's Character Fashion Products vol.37, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2013.37.5.704
  4. A Study on Press Preferences according to Clothing Design Factors of Children Dress - Focused on preschool children-mother - vol.17, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2015.17.1.53
  5. An Ethnographic Approach to Study on Purchasing Behaviors Regarding Preschool Children's Clothes vol.39, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2015.39.3.379
  6. Effects of Fashion Model’s Value and Shopping Propensity on Clothing Evaluation Criteria vol.67, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7233/jksc.2017.67.8.034