생물환경조절학회지 (Journal of Bio-Environment Control)

  • 제19권4호
  • /
  • Pages.343-350
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1229-4675(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-3641(eISSN)
한국생물환경조절학회 (The Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control)
권호 표지

수확시기가 신선편이 결구상추의 품질 및 미생물수에 미치는 영향

Effects of Harvest Seasons on Quality and Microbial Population of Fresh-cut Iceberg Lettuce

  • 인병천 (농진청 국립원예특작과학원) ;
  • 김지강 (농진청 국립원예특작과학원) ;
  • ;
  • 이정수 (농진청 국립원예특작과학원)
  • 투고 : 2010.07.29
  • 심사 : 2010.11.30
  • 발행 : 2010.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 수확시기와 같은 수확 전 요인이 수확 후 신선편이 결구상추의 품질과 미생물 수에 미치는 영향을 구명하기 위하여 수행하였다. 신선편이 가공업체에서 사용하는 결구상추를 5, 6, 7, 10, 12월에 수확하여 관행적인 방법으로 가공한 뒤 필름에 포장하고 $5^{\circ}C$에서 9일 동안 저장하면서 품질 조사를 하였다. 미생물 측정을 위한 샘플은 각 단계별(수확, 수송, 가공전, 절단, 1차-세척, 2차-세척, 저장 후 3, 6, 9일)로 수집되었다. 실험 결과 하우스에서 재배되어 5, 10월에 수확된 결구상추는 신선편이 가공 후 포장백 내부의 $O_2$ 농도가 낮고 $CO_2$는 매우 높았으며, 제품의 전해질 누출이 높게 나타났다. 반면 노지에서 재배된 6, 7월 수확 및 겨울철 하우스재배인 12월에 수확한 원료 는 비교적 낮은 $CO_2$, 전해질 누출 및 갈변을 나타내었다. 원료상태의 미생물수는 7월(6.76 log)에 가장 높았고, 신선편이 가공 후 저장중의 미생물 증식은 5월 시료에서 가장 높게 나타났다. 이상의 결과로부터 신선편이 결구상추를 고온, 저습조건의 노지에서 재배되어 6월 상순에 수확한 원료를 사용한 경우 품질과 미생물적 안전성이 모두 우수하였다. 반면, 하우스에서 재배되어 10월에 수확한 결구상추를 원료로 사용한 경우 가공 전과 후의 미생물적 안전성은 모두 우수하였으나, 이취가 빨리 발생하여 품질특성이 나쁘게 나타났다. 따라서 연중 고품질의 신선편이 결구상추 생산을 위해서는 품질과 안전성을 동시에 제어하고 원료의 환경에 따른 품질유지 기간을 달리 설정할 필요가 있는 것으로 생각된다.

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of harvest seasons on quality and microbial population at different steps of production chain of fresh-cut iceberg lettuce. Iceberg lettuces harvested in May, June, July, October, and December were processed following industrial practices, and stored at $5^{\circ}C$ for 9 days. For microbial measurement, samples were taken from each of the following steps: harvest, transport, pretreatment, cutting, 1st-washing, 2nd-washing, and day 3, 6, and 9 of storage. Iceberg lettuce cultivated in protect house and harvested in May and October showed higher $CO_2$ levels in the packages and electrolyte leakages than lettuce harvested in June, July and December. Microbial population of raw materials harvested in July was highest (6.76 log), and microbial growth rate during storage was highest in samples harvested in May. Lettuce harvested in June had better quality and microbial safety compared to other lettuces. Although lettuce harvested in October and December had less microbial population in either raw materials or processed products, those samples had inferior quality due to off-odor development and severe browning. Therefore, it is required to maintain quality and ensure microbial safety to distribute fresh-cut lettuce with high quality and safety throughout the year.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Allende, A., E. Aguayo, and F. Artes. 2004. Microbial and sensory quality of commercial fresh processed red lettuce throughout the production chain and shelf life. Int. J. Food 109-117.
  2. Cantwell, M.I. and T.V. Suslow. 2002. Postharvest handling systems: fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. In Postharvest technology of horticultural crops, Kader, A.A. (ed.), University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication 3311, CA, USA.
  3. Castaner, M., M.I. Gil, M. Victoria Ruiz, and F. Artes. 1999. Browning susceptibility of minimally processed baby and romaine lettuces. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 209:52-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002170050456
  4. Chesa, A., D. Frezza, A. Fraschna, G. Trinchero, and S. Moccia. 2003. Pre-harvest factors and fresh-cut vegetables quality. Acta Hort. 604:153-159.
  5. Jackson, L., K. Mayberry, F. Laemmlen, S. Koike, K. Schulbach, and W. Chaney. 1995. Iceberg lettuce production in California. p. 1-4. In Vegetable production series, Univ. of California.
  6. Hong, J.H. and K.C. Gross. 1998. Surface sterilization of whole tomato fruit with sodium hypochlorite influence subsequent postharvest behavior of fresh-cut slices. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 13:51-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(97)00072-0
  7. In, B.C., K. Sato, K. Ito, K. Inamoto, M. Doi, and G. Mori. 2006. Influences of preharvest relative humidity on yield, vase life and transpiration of cut roses. Environ. Control Biol. 44:257-263. https://doi.org/10.2525/ecb.44.257
  8. Kim, J.G. 2007. Fresh-cut produce industry and quality management. Semyung Publication, Suwon, Korea.
  9. Kim, J.G., Y. Luo, R.A. Saftner, and K.C. Gross. 2005. Delayed modified atmosphere packaging of fresh-cut romaine lettuce: Effects on quality maintenance and shelf-life. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 130:116-123.
  10. Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA). 2007. Climate Observation Data. KMA, Seoul, Korea.
  11. Lee, H.E., J.S. Lee, J.W. Choi, D.H. Pae, and K.R. Do. 2009. Effect of mechanical stress on postharvest quality of baby leaf vegetables. Kor. J. Food Preserv. 16:699-704.
  12. Lee, J.S., J.G. Kim, and S. Park. 2009. Effects of chlorine wash on the quality and microbial population of 'Tah Tasai' Chinese cabbage microgreen. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. 27:625-630.
  13. Lopez-Galvez, G., G. Peiser, X. Nie, and M. Cantwell. 1997. Quality changes in packaged salad products during storage. Zeithschrift Lebensmittel-Untersuchung Forschung 205:64-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002170050125
  14. Lopez-Galvez, G., M. Saltveit, and M. Cantwell. 1996. The visual quality of minimally processed lettuces stored in air or controlled atmosphere with emphasis on romaine and iceberg types. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 8:179-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-5214(95)00002-X
  15. Luo, Y., J.L. McEvoy, M.R. Wachtel, J.G. Kim, and Y. Huang. 2004. Package atmosphere affects postharvest biology and quality of fresh-cut cilantro leaves. HortSci. 39:567-570.
  16. Mortensen, L.M. 2000. Effects of air humidity on growth, flowering, keeping quality and water relations of four short-day greenhouse species. Sci. Hortic. 86:299-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(00)00155-2
  17. Rhodes, M.J.C. 1980. Respiration and senescence of plant organs. In: The biochemistry of plants, Stumph, P.K. and Conn, E.E. (ed.), Academic Press, NY, USA, pp. 419-462.
  18. Rural Development administration (RDA). 2003. Standard farming manual for western vegetables. RDA, Suwon, Korea.
  19. Saltveit, M.E. 2000. Wound induced changes in phenolic metabolism and tissue browning are altered by heat shock. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 21:61-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00165-4
  20. Torre, S. and T. Fjeld. 2001.Water loss and postharvest characteristics of cut roses grown at high or moderate relative air humidity. Sci. Hortic. 89:217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(00)00229-6
  21. Wills, R.B.H., P. Pristijono, and J.B. Golding. 2008. Browning on the surface of cut lettuce slices inhibited by short term exposure to nitric doxide (NO). Food Chem. 107:1387-1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.09.066
  22. Wills, R.B.H., W.B. McGlasson, D. Graham, and D.C. Joyce. 2007. Postharvest: an introduction to the physiology and handling of fruit, vegetables and ornamentals. UNSW Press, Sydney, Australia.
  23. Yang, S.F. and H.K. Pratt. 1978. The physiology of ethylene in wounded plant tissues. In: Biochemistry of wounded tissues, Kahl, G. (ed.), Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, German, pp. 595-622.