Journal of Animal Science and Technology

  • 제52권2호
  • /
  • Pages.103-110
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 2672-0191(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2055-0391(eISSN)
한국축산학회 (Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

약용식물(Artemisia, Acanthopanax and Garlic)의 급여가 돼지의 생산성에 미치는 영향

Effects of Supplemental Medicinal Plants (Artemisia, Acanthopanax and Garlic) on Productive Performance of Sows and on Growth and Carcass Traits in Finishing Pigs

  • 장해동 (단국대학교 동물자원학과) ;
  • 이제현 (단국대학교 동물자원학과) ;
  • 홍성민 (단국대학교 동물자원학과) ;
  • 정지홍 (단국대학교 동물자원학과) ;
  • 김인호 (단국대학교 동물자원학과)
  • Jang, Hae-Dong (Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, Je-Hyun (Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Hong, Seong-Min (Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Jung, Ji-Hong (Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, In-Ho (Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University)
  • 투고 : 2009.09.24
  • 심사 : 2010.03.15
  • 발행 : 2010.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 약용식물(Artemisia, Acanthopanx and Garlic)이 함유된 배합사료 급여시 돼지의 생산성에 미치는 영향을 알아보기 위해 실시하였다. 시험 1은 모돈 90두 공시하였다. 시험 설계는 1) CON (basal diet), 2) BM1 (basal diet +약용식물 0.1%) 및 3) BM2 (basal diet +약용식물 0.2%)로 3개 처리로 하였다. 등지방두께 변화량은 대조구에 비해 약용식물 급여 처리구가 낮은 감소량을 나타내었다(P<0.05). 자돈의 증체량은 대조구에 비해 약용식물 급여처리구가 높은 증체량을 나타내었다(P<0.05). 하지만, 모돈 사료섭취량, 직장온도 및 자돈의 생존율에서는 처리구간 차이를 나타내지 않았다. 시험2는 비육돈에 약용식물 급여시 생산성이 미치는 영향을 알아보기 위해 실시하였다. 시험 개시시 체중이 $65.21\;{\pm}\;0.04\;kg$인 3원 교잡종(Landrace ${\times}$ Yorkshire ${\times}$ Duroc)의 비육돈 60두를 공시하였으며, 8주간 사양시험을 실시하였다. 시험 설계는 1) CON (basal diet), 2) BM1 (basal diet +약용식물 0.1%) 및 3) BM2 (basal diet +약용식물 0.2%)로 3개 처리를 하여 처리당 5반복, 반복당 4두씩 완전임의 배치하였다. 4~8주와 전체기간에서 일당증체량에서 약용식물처리구가 대조구에 비해 유의적으로 높게 나타내었다(P<0.05). 등심의 pH와 가열감량에서는 CON 처리구가 BM1 처리구에 비해 유의적으로 높게 나타내었다(P<0.05). 보수력과 육즙감량에서는 대조구에 비해 약용식물 처리구가 유의적으로 높게 나타내었다(P<0.05). 육색, 지방산패도 및 등심단면적에서는 처리구간 차이를 나타내지 않았다. 결론적으로 비육돈에서는 일당 증체량, 보수력 및 가열 감량에서 효과를 나타내었으며, 모돈에서는 등지방두께 감소율과 복당증체량에 효과를 나타내었다.

This study was conducted to determine the effect of supplemental medicinal plants (Artemisia, Acanthopanx and Garlic) on productive parameters in pigs. In experiment 1, a total of 90 multiparous sows were used in a 21-d performance study. The diets included: 1) CON (basal diet; Control), 2) BM1 (CON + 0.1% medicinal plants) and 3) BM2 (CON + 0.2% medicinal plants). Backfat thickness from farrowing to weaning was higher (P<0.05) in CON compared with sows fed treatments diets. The piglets weight gain was higher in the medicinal plants treatments (P<0.05). ADFI, nutrient digestibility and survivability were not affected by the experimental treatments. In experiment 2, a total of 60 finishing pigs (Landrace ${\times}$ Yorkshire ${\times}$ Duroc, $65.21\;{\pm}\;0.04\;kg$ average initial body weight) were used in a 56-d performance assay to determine the effects of supplemental medicinal plants (Artemisia, Acanthopanx and Garlic) on growth performance and carcass characteristics in finishing pigs. The dietary treatments included: 1) CON (basal diet ; Control), 2) BM1 (CON + 0.1% medicinal plants) and 3) BM2 (CON + 0.2% medicinal plants). For 4~8 weeks and overall period, ADG was higher (P<0.05) in the pigs fed medicinal plants. CON treatment was higher 24 pH loin and cooking loss than BM1 treatment (P<0.05). Water holding capacity and drip loss after 1day were affected by the dietary treatments (P<0.05). No numerical differences were observed in sensory evaluation, meat color, TBARS and loin area among three treatments. In conclusion, the results obtained from this feeding trial suggest that the medicinal plants mixture supplementation in diets for finishing pigs can improve ADG, water holding capacity, cooking loss and it improved backfat loss in sow and, litter weight gain.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aaslyng, M. D., Bejerholm, C., Ertbjerg, P., Bertram, H. C. and Andersen, H. J. 2003. Cooking loss and juiciness of pork in relation to raw meat quality and cooking procedure. Food Quality and Preference 14, 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00086-1
  2. Aherne, F. X. and Kirkwood, R. N. 1985. Nutrition and sow prolificacy. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 33:169.
  3. Berg, R. D. 1998. Probiotics, prebiotics or conbiotics. Trends microbial. 6:89-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-842X(98)01224-4
  4. Byrne, C. E., Troy, D. J. and Buckley, D. J. 2000. Postmortem changes in muscle electrical properties of bovine m. longissimus dorsi and their relationship to meat quality attributes and pH fall. Meat Sci. 54, 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00055-8
  5. Dausch, J. G. and Nixon, D. W. 1990. Garlic: A review of its relationship to malignant disease. Preventive Medicine. 19:346-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(90)90034-H
  6. Dewit, J. C., Notemans, S., Gorin, N. and Kampelmacher, E. H. 1979. Effect of garlic oil or onion oil on toxin production by clostridium botulinum in meat slurry. J. Food Prot. 42:222-224. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-42.3.222
  7. Dourmad, J. Y., Etienne, M., Prunier, A. and Noblet. J. 1994. The effect of energy and protein intake of sows on their longevity : A review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 40:87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(94)90039-6
  8. Duncan, D. B. 1995. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics.
  9. Hofmann, K., Hamm, R. and Bluchel, E. 1982. New information on the determination of water binding in meat by the filter paper press method. Fleischwirtsch. 62, 87-94.
  10. Ilsley, S. E., Miller, H. M., Greathead, M. R. and Kamel, C. 2002. Plant extracts enhance sow lactation performance. J. Anim. Sci. 80(Suppl. 1): 41(Abstr.).
  11. Ilsley, S. E., Miller, H. M., Greathead, H. M. R. and Kamel, C. 2003. Plant extracts as supplements for lactating : effects on piglets performance, sow food intake and diet digestibility. Aminal Science. 77:247-254.
  12. Kang, B. S., Kim, H. H., Ahn, D. K. and Choi, H. Y. 2001. Vasodilation effect of the various parts the water extract of Eleutherococus senticosus Maxim. On isolated thoracic aorta and abdominal aorta form rat. Korean. J. Herbology. 16:13-18.
  13. Kensinger, R. S., Collier, R. J., Bazer, F. W., Ducsay, C. A. and Becker, H. N. 1982. Nucleic acid, metabolic and histological changes in gilt mammary tissue during pregnancy and lactogenesis. J. Anim. Sci. 54:1297-1308. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1982.5461297x
  14. Kim, B. K., Woo, S. C., Kim, Y. J. and Park, C. I. 2002. Effect of feeding mugwort level on pork quality. Korean J. Food Sci. Ani. Resour. 22, 310-315.
  15. Kim, B. K., Kang, S. S. and Kim, Y. J. 2001. Effect of dietary oriental medicine refuse and mugwort powder on physicochemical properties of Korean native pork. Korean J. Food Sci. Ani. Resour. 21, 208-214.
  16. Kim, S. W., Hurley, W. L., Han, I. K., Stein, H. H. and Easter, R. A. 1999. Effect of nutrient intake on mammary gland growth in lactating sows. J. Anim. Sci. 77(12):3304-3315. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.77123304x
  17. Lawrie, R. A. 1985. Development in meat science : Packa-ging Fresh Meat (A. A. Taylor (Eds)). Elsevier Applied Science Publisher. P. 89.
  18. Lee, T. B. 1965. Medical botany. Dongmyungsa, Seoul. Korea
  19. Lee, S. H., Lee, S. D. and Park, R. H. 1990. Manufacturing method of swine feed by using korea medical herb residue. Kor. Patent. 10-1990-0010794.
  20. Melody, L., Lonergan, S. M., Rowe, L. J., Huiatt, T. W., Mayes, M. S. and Huff-Lonergan, E. 2004. Early post mortem biochemical factors influence tenderness and water-holding capacity of three porcine muscles, J. Ani. Sci. 82, 1195-1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.026
  21. Muchenje, V., Dzama, K., Chimonyo, M., Raats, J. G. and Strydom, P. E. 2008. Meat quality of Nguni, Bonsmara and Aberdeen Angus steers raised on natural pasture in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Meat Sci. 79, 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.026
  22. NPPC. 2000. Composition & Quality Assessment Procedures. E. Berg, ed. Natl. Pork Prod. Council, Des Moines, IA. USA. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00123-5
  23. Oeckel, M. J., Warnants, N. and Boucqué, C. V. 1999. Comparison of different methods for measuring water holding capacity and juiciness of pork versus on-line screening methods, Meat Sci. 51, 313-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00123-5
  24. Okuda, H., Hatano, T., Agata, I., Nishibe, S. and Kimura, K. 1986. Tannins in Artemisia Montana. A. Princes and related species of plant. Yakugaku Zasshi. 106:894. https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi1947.106.10_894
  25. SAS. 1999. SAS/STAT software for PC. User's guide, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
  26. Tsinas, A. C., Kyriakis, S. C., Bourtzi-Chatzopoulou, E., Aresenakis, M., Sarris, K., Papasteriades, A. and Lekkas, S. 1998b. Control porcine proliferative enteropathy by in feed application of Oreganum essential oils. Proc. Of the 15th IPVS Congr. Birmingham. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00039-X
  27. Van der Wal, P. G., Engel, B. and Reimert, H. G. M. 1999. The effect of stress, applied immediately before stunning, on pork quality. Meat Sci. 53, pp. 101-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00039-X
  28. Witte, V. C., Krause, G. F. and Bailey, M. E. 1970. A new extraction method for determining 2-thiobarbituric acid values for pork and beef during storage. J. Food Sci. 35, 582-587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1970.tb04815.x
  29. 권오석. 2004. 약용식물의 사료내 첨가가 양돈 생산성에 미치는 영향. 단국 대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  30. 양동식, 차민호, 강봉주, 오세욱, 김영언, 윤유식. 2003. 가시오가피가 함유 된 성장촉진용 조성물의 골성장효과 연구. 한국식품과학회지. 35:702-707.
  31. 허 준. 1978. 한방동의보감.

피인용 문헌

  1. Effects of Drying Methods on Anthocyanin Contents of Colored Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cv. Boanchalbori vol.33, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2013.33.4.234
  2. Antioxidant activity of Bamboo powder and its immunoreactivity in the pig vol.37, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2014.37.2.111