감성 평가척도에 의한 공간 환경의 실증분석에 관한 연구 - 경기도미술관과 서울시립미술관의 로비 공간환경에 대한 비교연구를 중심으로 -

An Empirical Study on Museums' Spatial Environments using a Sensibility Rating Scale - By comparing spatial environments of the lobbies of the Gyeonggido Museum of modern Art and the Seoul Museum of Art -

  • 한명흠 (부천대학 실내건축학과) ;
  • 오인욱 (경원대학교 실내건축학과)
  • 투고 : 2010.09.30
  • 심사 : 2010.11.05
  • 발행 : 2010.12.31

초록

The purposes of this study are to present the criteria for a sensibility rating scale for measuring the general public's perception of museums' spatial environment, particularly lobby space, through an empirical analysis; and to clarify the characteristics of the presented rating scale in terms of each rating element and factor. For this study, a survey was conducted during September 11-17, 2010, and a total of 370 museum visitors participated in the survey. A sensibility rating scale used for the survey consisted of a total of 32 adjectives selected from a literature review of previous studies. To specify the dimensions of semantic space using the semantic adjectives, words with opposite meanings were analyzed with the semantic differential technique developed by Osgood et al. Using SPSS, a reliability analysis, factor analysis, and cluster analysis were conducted on the data obtained from the survey. The results of this study can be summarized as follows: According to the general public's perception of museum lobbies, five factors were found from the 19 semantic ratings of the Gyeonggido Museum of Modern Art and the 20 semantic ratings of the Seoul Museum of Art, respectively. In the case of Gyeonggido Museum of Modern Art, three additional semantic words of 'orderly', 'open', and 'original', which did not appear in the case of Seoul Museum of Art, were discovered. In the case of Seoul Museum of Art, more detailed semantic words such as 'restrained', 'ordinary', 'concrete', and 'intellectual (rational)' were obtained. Five semantic elements, which describe the two museums, were: Feelings of 'pleasantness', 'value, 'usage', 'aesthetics', and 'materials'. According to a comparative analysis of the two lobby spaces in terms of semantic rating elements, Gyeonggido Museum of Modern Art was perceived to be an orderly, original, open, soft, and female-like space, whereas Seoul Museum of Art was perceived to be aesthetic, restrained, concrete, realistic, intellectual and rational. In the coming years, the results of this study will serve as valuable data for constructing a sensibility rating scale for evaluating spatial environments of museums.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Jonathan King, Philip Langdon, The CRS team and the business of architecture, Texas A&M University Press College Station, 2002
  2. WiIliam Wayne Caudil, Architecture by Team, 건축의 협동작업, 국제출판공사, 1987
  3. 박미자 외 3인, 감성측정을 위한 우리말 형용사의 의미구조, 한국감성공학회지, Vol.1 No.2, 1998
  4. 송지준, SPSS/AMOS 통계분석방법, 21세기사, 2009
  5. 양병화, 다변량 데이터 분석법에 대한 이해, 커뮤니케이션스북스, 2006
  6. 오인욱.한명흠, 공간환경의 감성평가척도에 관한 연구, 한국실내디자인학회논문집 Vol.19 No.5 통권 82호, 2010.10
  7. 정현원, 감성 평가를 위한 감성의 의미 재정립과 어휘 체계에 관한 연구, 대한인간공학회 제26권 제3호, 2007
  8. 채서일, 사회과학 조사 방법론, 법문사, 1992
  9. 홍병호, 지각과 표현, 강남대학교 논문집, 제40호, 2002
  10. 홍수연, 웹사이트 사용자 감성유형 분류를 통한 감성척도 연구, 한국감성과학회지 Vol.12 No.1, 2009