DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Types and Ultrastructural Characteristics of Antennal Sensilla on Aphidius colemani (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)

콜레마니진디벌(Aphidius colemani) 촉각에 분포하는 감각기의 종류 및 외부미세구조적 특징

  • Kwon, Hye-Ri (Dept. Applied Biology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Yoon, Kyu-Sik (Dept. Applied Biology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kang, Min-A (Dept. Applied Biology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Park, Min-Woo (Dept. Applied Biology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jo, Shin-Hyuk (Dept. Applied Biology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kang, Eun-Jin (Dept. Applied Biology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Seo, Mi-Ja (Dept. Applied Biology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Yu, Yong-Man (Dept. Applied Biology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Youn, Young-Nam (Dept. Applied Biology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University)
  • 권혜리 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 응용생물학과) ;
  • 윤규식 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 응용생물학과) ;
  • 강민아 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 응용생물학과) ;
  • 박민우 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 응용생물학과) ;
  • 조신혁 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 응용생물학과) ;
  • 강은진 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 응용생물학과) ;
  • 서미자 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 응용생물학과) ;
  • 유용만 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 응용생물학과) ;
  • 윤영남 (충남대학교 농업생명과학대학 응용생물학과)
  • Received : 2010.11.18
  • Accepted : 2010.12.15
  • Published : 2010.12.30

Abstract

Several species of the genus Aphidius are used in biological control programs against aphid pests throughout the world and their behavior and physiology are well studied. While the importance of sensory organs in their behavior is understood, their antennal structure remains largely unknown. In this study, the external morphology and distribution of the antennal sensilla on the antennal of both female and male adults of A. colemani were described using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Generally, the filiform antennae of males ($l,515.2{\pm}116.5\;{\mu}m$) are longer than females ($l,275.1{\pm}103.4\;{\mu}m$). Antennae of this species are made up of radicle, scape, pedicel and flagellomeres. Male and female antennae differed in the total number of flagellomeres as 15 in males and 13 in females. The result of SEM observation was characterization and grouping of seven types of receptors into morphological classcs: Bohm bristles, Sensilla placodea, 2 types of S. coeloconica and S. trichodea, and S. basiconica as with a tip pore and with wall pores. In addition, the possible functions of the above sensilla types arc discussed in light of previously published literature; mechanoreception (Bohm bristles, S, coeloconica I & II and S. trichodea) and chemoreception (S. placodea, S. basiconica type I & II).

Aphidius속(Hymenuptera: Braconidae)에 속하는 일부 종은 주로 생물학적 방제 인자로서 사용되고 있으며, 행동학적 생태에 대하여 연구가 많이 되어있다. 행동에 있어서 신경기관을 중요성을 알고 있음에도 불구하고 촉각의 구조는 널리 알려져 있지 않다. 본 연구에서는 콜레마니진디벌의 암수 성충의 촉각에 분포하는 감각기를 주사전자현미경(SEM)을 이용하여 분류하고, 외부형태를 관찰하였다. 일반적으로 콜레마니진디벌의 촉각은 염주상(filiform)의 형태로 수컷($1,515.2{\pm}116.5\;{\mu}m$)이 암컷($l,275.1{\pm}103.4\;{\mu}m$)보다 더 길다. 촉각은 촉각근절(radicle), 밑마디(scape), 자루마디(pedicel, 채찍마디(flagellomeres)로 구분된다. 암 수컷의 채찍마디의 수에서 수컷은 15마디, 암컷은 13마디로 차이가 나타났다. 콜레마니진디벌의 촉각을 SEM을 이용하여 관찰한 결과, 총 7 종류의 감각기 즉; Bohm bristles, Sensilla placodea와 두 가지 타입의 S. coeloconica, S. trichodea, 또 tip pore 또는 wall pores가 있는지 여부에 띠라 두 가지 S. basiconica를 확인할 수 있었다. 이전에 연구들을 바탕으로 각 감각기들의 기능을 추측해볼 때 Bohm bristles과 S. coeloconica type I & II, S. trichodea 등은 기계적감각을, S. placodea, S. basiconica type I & II는 회학적감각을 담당할 것으로 추정된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Alborn, H.T., W.J. Lewis and J.H. Tumlinson. 1995. Host-specific recognition kairomone for the parasitoid Microplitis croceipes (Cresson). J. Chem. Ecol. 21: 1697-1708. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033670
  2. Altner, H. and L. Prillinger. 1980. Ultrastructure of invertebrate chemo-, thermo-, and hygroreceptors and its functional significance. Int'l. Rev. Cytol. 67: 39-139.
  3. Altner, H., C.H. Routil and R. Loftus. 1981. The structure of bimodal chemo-, thermo-, and hygroreceptive sensilla on the antenna of Locusta migratoria. Cell Tiss. Res. 215: 289-308.
  4. Altner, L. 1977. Insect sensillum specifity and Structure: an approach to a new topology. Olfaction and Taste IV (eds. J. LeMangen and P. MacLeods). Information Retrieval, London. pp. 295-303.
  5. Askari, A. and A. Alishah. 1979. Courtship behavior and evidence for a sex pheromone in Diaeretiella rapae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), the cabbage aphid primary parasitoid. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 72: 749-750. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/72.6.749
  6. Barbarossa, I.T., P. Muroni, M. Dardani, P. Casula and A.M. Angioy. 1998. New insight into the antennal chemosensory function of Opius concolor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Int'l. J. Zool. 65: 367-370.
  7. Barlin, M.R. and S.B. Vinson. 1981. Multiporous plate sensilla in the antenna of the Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). Int'l J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 10: 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7322(81)90011-8
  8. Basibuyuk, H.H. and D.L.J. Quicke. 1999. Gross morphology of multiporous plate sensilla in the Hymenoptera (Insecta). Zool. Scripta. 28: 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-6409.1999.00007.x
  9. Beckage, N.E. and D.B. Gelman. 2004. Wasp parasitoid distruption of host development: implications for new biologically based strategies for insect control. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 49: 299-330. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123324
  10. Bleeker, M.A.K., H.M. Smid, A.C. van Aelst and J.J.A. van Loon. 2004. Antennal sensilla of two parasitoid wasps: A comparative scanning electron microscopy study. Micro. Res. & Tech. 63: 266-273. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.20038
  11. Bouchard, Y. and C. Cloutier. 1985. Role of olfaction in host finding by aphid parasitoid Aphidius nigripes (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 11: 801-808. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988307
  12. Bourdais, D., P. Vernon, L. Krespi, J.L Lannic and J.V Baaren. 2006. Antennal structure of male and female Aphidius rhopalosiphi DeStefani-Peres (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): Description and morphological alterations after cold storage of heat exposure. Micro. Res. & Tech. 69: 1005-1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.20378
  13. Chapman, RF. 1998. The Insects. Structure and Function, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press. pp. 8-10.
  14. Chau, A. and M. Mackauer. 2001. Preference of the aphid parasitoid Monoctonus paulensis (Hymenoptera: Braconidea, Aphidiinae) for different aphid species: female choice and offspring survival. Biol. Con. 20: 30-38. https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.2000.0881
  15. Colinet, H., C. Salin, G. Boivin and T.H. Hance. 2005. Host age and fitness-ralated traits in a koinobiont aphid parasitoid. Ecol. Entomol. 30: 473-479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00716.x
  16. Dreller, C. and W.H. Kirchner. 1993. Hearing in honeybees: localization of the auditory sense organ. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 173: 275-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00212691
  17. Dweck, H.K.M. and N.S. Gadallah. 2008. Description of the antennal sensilla of Habrobracon hebetor. Biocontrol. 53: 841-856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-007-9145-6
  18. Fukushima, J., Y. Kainoh, H. Honda and J. Takabayashi. 2002. Learning of herbivore-induced and nonspecific plant volatiles by a parasitoid, Cotesia kariyai. J. Chem. Ecol. 28: 579-586. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014548213671
  19. Gao, Y., L. Li-Zhi and H. Abner. 2007. Antennal morphology, structure and sensilla distribution in Microplitis pallidipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Micron. 38: 684-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2006.09.004
  20. Godfray, H.C.J. 1994. Parasitoids: Behavioural and Evolutionary Ecology. Monographs in Behavior and Ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. pp. 1-476.
  21. Hagvar, E.B. and T. Hofsvang. 1991. Aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera, Aphidiidae): biology, host selection and use in biological control. Biocon. News & Inform. 12: 13-41.
  22. Hays, D.B. and S.B. Vinson. 1971. Acceptance of Heliothis virescens (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) as a host by parasite Cardiochiles nigriceps Viereck (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Anim. Behav. 19: 344-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(71)80015-5
  23. Hu, F., G.N. Zhang and J.J Wang. 2009a. Scanning electron microscopy studies of antennal sensilla of bruchid beetles, Callisibruchus chinensis (L.) and Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Micron. 40: 320-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2008.11.001
  24. Hu, F., G.N. Zhang and J.J Wang. 2009b. Antennal sensillae of five stored-product psocids pests (Psocoptera: Liposcelididea). Micron. 40: 628-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2009.02.006
  25. Hoballah, M.E., C. Tamo and T.C.J. Turlings. 2002. Differential attractiveness of induced odors emitted by eight maize varieties for the parasitoid Cotesia marginiventris: is quality or quantity important? J. Chem. Ecol. 28: 951-968. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015253600083
  26. Hofsvang, T. and E.B Hagvar. 1975a. Developmentral rate, longevity, fecundity, and oviposition period of Ephedrus cerasicola Stary (Hymenoptera; Aphidiidae) parasitizing M. persicae Sulz (Homoptera; Aphididae) on paprika. Norwe. J. Entomol. 22: 15-22.
  27. Hofsvang, T. and E.B. Hagvar. 1975b. Duration of development and longevity in Aphidius ervi and Aphidius platensis (Hymenoptera; Aphidiidae), two parasites of Myzus persicae (Homoptera; Aphididae). Entomophaga. 20: 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02373446
  28. Hofsvang, T. and E.B. Hagvar. 1978. Larval morphology and development of Aphidius colemani Viereck and Ephedrus cerasicola Stary(Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Norwe. J. Entomol. 25: 1-8.
  29. Islam, K.S., H.A.S. Perera and M.J.W Copland. 1997. The effects of parasitism by an encyrtid parasitoid, Anagyrus pseudococci on the survival, reproduction and physiological changes of the mealybug, Planococcus citri. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 84: 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.1997.00200.x
  30. Kalina, V. and P. Stary. 1976. A review of the aphidophagous Aphlinidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea), their distribution and host range in Euroup. Studia Entomol. Forestalia (Praha, Czechoslovakia). 2: 143-170.
  31. Karamaouna, F. and M.J.W. Copland. 2000. Host suitability, quality and host size preference of Leptomastix epona and Pseodaphvcus flavidulus, two endoparasitoids of the mealybug Pseudococcus viburni, and host size effect on parasitoid sex ratio and clutch size. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 96: 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.2000.00690.x
  32. Keil, T.A. 1999. Morphology and development of the peripheral olfactory organs. In: Hanson, B.S., editor. Insect Olfaction. New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 5-47.
  33. Kim, Y.G. and J.A. Park. 2006. Distribution of antennal sensilla in Cotesia plutellae and effect of flagellectomy on parasitism. Kor. J. Appl. Entomol. 45: 378-380.
  34. Langer, A. and T. Hance. 2004. Enhancing parasitism of wheat aphids through apparent competition: A tool for biological control. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 102: 205-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2003.07.005
  35. Legrand, M.A., H. Colinet, P. Vernon and T. Hance. 2004. Autumn, winter, and spring dynamics of aphid Sitobion avenae and parasitoid Aphidius rhopalosiphi interactions. Ann. Appl. Biol. 145: 139-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2004.tb00369.x
  36. Liu, S.S., R. Morton and R.D. Hughes. 1984. Oviposition preference of a hymenopterous parasite for certain instars of its aphid host. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 35: 249-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1984.tb03389.x
  37. Martinou, A.F. and D.J. Wright. 2007. Host instar and host plant effects on Aphidius colemani. J. Appl. Entomol. 131: 621-624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2007.01220.x
  38. McClure, M., J. Whistlecraft and J.N. McNeil. 2007. Courtship behavior in relation to the female sex pheromone in the parasitoid, Aphidius ervi (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 33: 1946-1959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-007-9355-5
  39. Milne, W.M. 1988. Factors affecting the performance of Aphidius ervi in the laboratory and its potential for establishment in the field. In: Niemczyk E; Dixon AFG Ecology and effectiveness of aphidophaga.(eds) The Hague; SPB Academic Publishing. pp. 203-210.
  40. Ochieng, S.A., K.C. Park, J.W. Zhu and T.C. Baker. 2000. Functional morphology of antennal chemoreceptors of the parasitoid Microplitis crocceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Arthropod Struct. Dev. 29: 231-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1467-8039(01)00008-1
  41. Onagbola, E.O. and H.Y. Fadamiro. 2008. Scanning electron microscopy studies of antennal sensilla of Pteromalus cereallellae (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Micron. 39: 546-535.
  42. Pandey, S. and R. Singh. 1999. Host size induced variation in sex ratio of an aphid parasitoid Lysiphlebia mirizai. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 90: 61-67. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.1999.00423.x
  43. Pare, W. and J.H. Tumlinson. 1999. Plant volatiles as a defense against insect herbivores. Plant Physiol. 121: 325-331. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.121.2.325
  44. Park, S.J., H.W. Oh, Y.N. Youn and H.Y. Park. 2001. Structure of antennal sensilla on the adult asian ladybird, Hamonia axyridis Pallas (Coleoptera: Coccinellidea). Kor. J. Electron Microscopy. 31: 91-99.
  45. Platt, K.B., K.J. Linthicum, K.S. Myint, B.L Innis, K. Lerdthusnee and D.W. Vaughn. 1997. Impact of dengue virus infection on feeding behavior of Aedes aegypti. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 57: 119-125.
  46. Powell, W. and Z. Zhi-li. 1983. The reactions of two cereal aphid parasitoids, Aphidius uzbekistanicus and A. ervi to host aphids and their food-plants. Physiol. Entomol. 8: 439-443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1983.tb00378.x
  47. Read, D.P., P.P. Feeny and R.B. Root. 1970. Habitat selection by aphid parasite Diaeretiella rapae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and hyperparasite Charips brassicae (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Canadian Entomol. 102: 1567-1578. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent1021567-12
  48. Roux, O., J.V. Barren, C. Gers, L. Arvanitakis and L. Legel. 2005. Antennal structure and ovipositon behavior of the Plutella xylostella specialist parasitoid: Cotesia plutellae. Micro. Res. & Tech. 68: 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.20220
  49. Sampaio, M.V., V.H.P. Bueno and B.F. De Conti. 2008. The effect of the quality and size of host aphid species on the biological characteristics of Aphidius colemani (Hymenoptera : Braconidae: Aphidiinae). Eur. J. Entomol. 105: 489-494. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2008.063
  50. Schneider, D. 1964. Insect antennae. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 9: 103-122. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.09.010164.000535
  51. Schwartzkopff, J. 1974. Mechanoreception. In: The Physiology of Insecta; 2nd ed., Vol. II (ed. M. Rockstein). New York and London: Academic Press. pp. 273-352.
  52. Shalaby, F.F. and J.M. Rabasse. 1979. On the biology of Aphidius matricariae Hal. (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae), parasite on Myzus persicae (Sulz.) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Ann. Agricul. Sci. Moshtohor. 11: 75-96.
  53. Singer, M.S., D. Rodrigues, J.O. Stireman and Y. Carriere. 2004. Role of food quality and enemy-free space in host use by generalist insect herbivore. Ecol. 85: 2747-2753. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0827
  54. Soroker, V., S. Talebaev, A.R. Harari and S.D. Wesley. 2004. The role of chemical cues in host and mate location in the pear psylla Cacopsylla bidens (Homoptera: Psyllidae). J. Insect Behav. 17: 613-626. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOIR.0000042544.35561.1c
  55. Stary, P. 1975. Aphidius colemani Viereck: its taxonomy, distribution and host range (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Acta. Entomol. Bohemoslovaca 72: 156-163.
  56. Steinberg, S., M. Dicke and L.E.M. Vet. 1993. Relative importance of infochemicals from first and second trophic level in ling-range host location by the larval parasitoid Cotesia glomerata. J. Chem. Ecol. 19: 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987470
  57. Steinbrecht, R.A. 1984. Arthropods: chemo-, thermo, and hygroreceptors. In: Bereiter-Hahn J, Matolsty AG, Richards KS (Eds.), Biology of the Integument, vol. 1. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 523-553.
  58. Storeck, A., G.M. Poppy, H.F. van Emden and W. Powell. 2000. The role of plant chemical cue in determining host preference in the generalist aphid parasitoid Aphidius colemani. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 97: 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.2000.00714.x
  59. Takanashi, M. 1990. Development and reproductive ability of Lysiphlebus japonicus Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) parasitizing the citrus brown aphid, Toxoptera citricidus (Kirkaldy) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Jpn. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 34: 237-243. https://doi.org/10.1303/jjaez.34.237
  60. Taylor, A.J., C.B. Müler and H.C.J. Godfray. 1998. Effect of aphid predators on oviposition behavior of aphid parasitoids. J. Insect Behav. 11: 297-302. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021056226037
  61. Turlings, T.C.J., J.H. Loughrin, P.J. McCall, U.S.R. Roe and W. Lewis. 1995. How caterpillar-damaged plants protect themselves by attracting parasitic wasps. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92: 4169-4174. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.10.4169
  62. van Lenteren JC. 2003. Quality Control and Production of Biological Control Agents: Theory and Testing Procedures(ed.). CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. pp. 1-352.
  63. Weselow, R.M. 1972. Sense organs of hyperparasite Cheiloneurus noxius (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) important in host selection process. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 65: 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/65.1.41
  64. Zacharuk, R. Y. 1980. Ultrastructure and function of insect chemosensilla. Ann. Rev. Ent. 25: 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.25.010180.000331
  65. Zacharuk, R.Y. 1985. Antennae and sensilla, In: Kerkut G.A., Gilbert L.I. (eds.). Comparative insect physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology. Vol. 6. Pergamon Press, Oxford. pp. 1-69.