The Comparative Study on Decoctions of Ssanghwa-tang(Shuanghe-tang) Extracted by Different Extraction Conditions

전탕 조건에 따른 쌍화탕 전탕액 비교 연구

  • Kim, Jung-Hoon (Herbal Medicine EBM Research Center, Standard Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine) ;
  • Seo, Chang-Seob (Herbal Medicine EBM Research Center, Standard Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Hyeun-Kyoo (Herbal Medicine EBM Research Center, Standard Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine)
  • 김정훈 (한국한의학연구원 표준화연구본부 한약EBM연구센터) ;
  • 서창섭 (한국한의학연구원 표준화연구본부 한약EBM연구센터) ;
  • 신현규 (한국한의학연구원 표준화연구본부 한약EBM연구센터)
  • Received : 2010.09.14
  • Accepted : 2010.11.10
  • Published : 2010.12.30

Abstract

Objectives : This study was performed to compare the differences between decoctions extracted by different extraction conditions. Methods : Two different decoctions were prepared with pressured or non-pressured extraction conditions for 60, 120 and 180min. The yields of extracts, sugar contents, hydrogen ion concentrations(pH), the contents of reference compounds and individual preferences on Ssanghwa-tang(Shuanghe-tang) were investigated. Results : As extraction time increased, individual preferences for decoctions by pressured extraction tended to increase more than those by non-pressured extraction, and the yields and sugar contents of both decoctions showed the tendency of increase. The pH values of decoctions in pressured conditions were lower than those in non-pressured conditions in all extraction times and both extraction conditions showed decreasing pH values according to increase of extraction times. Of the reference compounds, paeoniflorin showed higher contents in non-pressured conditions than in pressured conditions and the contents of cinnamaldehyde were always lower in non-pressured conditions than in pressured conditions at all time. Conclusions : The decoctions of Ssanghwa-tang(Shuanghe-tang) extracted by pressured or non-pressured extraction for 60, 120, 180min exhibited different individual preferences, yields of extracts, sugar contents, pH, reference compounds contents.

Keywords

References

  1. 김상찬, 김대희, 하수연. 대구 시내 한의원의 전탕 실태에 관한 조사연구. 동서의학. 2000;24(4) :1-39.
  2. 한국한의학연구원. 2008년도 한방 의료 이용 실태 조사. 2009:118.
  3. 金護哲, 安德均, 李尙仁, 金容鎭. 煎湯器의 材質과 煎湯時間에 따른 抽出效果에 관한 硏究. 本草分科學會誌. 1993;8(1):29-36.
  4. 金度完, 朴昌國. 煎湯時間에 따른 生大黃및 酒 大黃이 瘀血病態模型에 미치는 影響. 大韓韓方 內科學會誌. 1998;19(1):114-33.
  5. 김윤경. 육계의 전탕방법이 성분추출과 약효에 미치는 영향-제형개변에 관한 연구-. 경희대학교 한의학과 석사학위 논문. 2000.
  6. 최성모. 四物湯과 四君子湯의 煎湯방법의 차이 에 관한 GC 분석 실험. 동의생리병리학회지. 2006;20(3):634-7.
  7. 안규환, 최창민, 김송백, 조한백. 가미조경탕의 전탕 방법에 따른 항혈전 및 염증에 관한 연구. 대한한방부인과학회지. 2009;22(1):53-78.
  8. 양웅모, 정규진, 김경옥, 배현수, 장문석, 박성규. 전탕방법에 따른 전탕액의 추출률 비교연구-평위산 전탕액의 hesperidin HPLC 분석-. 大韓本草學會誌. 2010;25(1):9-12.
  9. 식품의약품안전청. 한국인의 한약재 복용실태조사 연구. 2006:91-4.
  10. 천연물화학 교재편찬위원회. 천연물화학. 도서출판 영림사. 2003:159, 236.
  11. 卢艳花. 中药有效成分提取分离实例. 化学工业出版社. 2007:138.