Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics

The Korean Pediatric Society (대한소아청소년과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of clinical and laboratory characteristics in children with type 1 diabetes according to pancreatic autoantibodies

췌장 자가 항체 유무에 따른 제 1형 당뇨병의 임상 및 검사 소견의 비교

  • Choi, Ji Hae (Department of Pediatrics, Chonbuk National University Medical School) ;
  • Kim, Min Sun (Department of Pediatrics, Chonbuk National University Medical School) ;
  • Kim, Chan Jong (Department of Pediatrics, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Kim, Jong Duk (Department of Pediatrics, Wonkwang University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Dae-Yeol (Department of Pediatrics, Chonbuk National University Medical School)
  • 최지혜 (전북대학교 의학전문대학원 소아과학교실) ;
  • 김민선 (전북대학교 의학전문대학원 소아과학교실) ;
  • 김찬종 (전남대학교 의학전문대학원 소아과학교실) ;
  • 김종덕 (원광대학교 의과대학 소아과학교실) ;
  • 이대열 (전북대학교 의학전문대학원 소아과학교실)
  • Received : 2009.11.05
  • Accepted : 2010.02.18
  • Published : 2010.03.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is any difference in the clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with autoantibody-positive and patients with autoantibody-negative type 1 diabetes at initial presentation. Methods : We analyzed 96 patients under 18 years of age with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. One or both of the pancreatic autoantibodies-glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies (GADA) and insulin autoantibody (IAA)-were measured in all patients, and we reviewed clinical and laboratory characteristics according to the presence of these autoantibodies. Results : GADA was examined in 48 of 87 patients, and 55.2% of patients were positive. IAA was checked in 88 patients, and 39.8% were positive. Both GADA and IAA were measured in 83 patients, and 22.8% had both antibodies. The patients who had one or both autoantibodies (autoantibody-positive group) were younger than those not having any autoantibody (autoantibody-negative group). The autoantibody-positive group had lower BMI, corrected sodium level, and serum effective osmolarity, compared to the autoantibody-negative group (P <0.05). Similar differences were found between the GADA-positive and GADA-negative groups. However, there were no significant differences between the IAA-positive and IAA-negative groups. Conclusion : The prevalence of pancreatic autoantibodies was significantly higher in the under-6 years age group than in the other age groups. These findings suggest that measurement of autoantibodies at the initial diagnosis of diabetes is very useful for detecting immune-mediated type 1 diabetes and providing intensive insulin therapy, especially in younger children.

목 적 : 제 1형 당뇨병에서 보이는 자가 항체와 질환의 진행에 따른 변화와의 관계는 여러 연구에서 보고되었고, 항체가가 높을수록 진행의 정도가 급격하였다. 따라서 진단 당시에 시행한 자가 항체의 발현 여부에 따라 임상 발현 정도가 다를 것으로 생각하여, 자가 항체 유무에 따라 임상 양상과 검사 소견의 차이가 있는지를 확인하고자 하였다. 방 법 : 1999년 4월부터 2008년 3월까지 3개 대학병원에 내원하여 제 1형 당뇨병으로 진단받은 18세 미만 환자 중 처음 진단 당시에 췌장 자가 항체인 GADA 혹은 IAA의 검사를 시행하였던 96명에서 진단 당시 시행한 혈액 검사 및 임상 양상을 항체 그룹에 따라 나누어 비교 분석하였다. 결 과 : GADA는 87명의 환자에서 검사가 이루어 졌고, 이 중 48명(55.2%)에서 양성을 보였다. IAA는 88명 중 35명(39.8%)이 양성을 보였다. 두가지 항체를 모두 검사한 환자는 83명이었고, 이 중 22.8%에서 두 항체가 모두 검출되었고, 38.6%에서는 모두 음성을 보였다. 1가지 이상의 항체를 갖는 환자군에서는 음성군에 비해 비교적 어린 나이에 당뇨병이 발생하였고, 낮은 BMI, 낮은 혈청 교정 Na 수치 및 낮은 혈청 오스몰농도를 보였다(P <0.05). 자가 항체 중 GADA 양성군과 음성군 사이의 검사소견 상에서도 같은 차이를 보였다. 그러나 IAA 항체 유무에 따른 비교에서는 발생 연령이외는 두 군사이에 임상 및 검사소견상 유의한 차이를 볼 수 없었다. 결 론 : 항체 양성군과 음성군 사이에서 보이는 대사적 결과의 차이는 비교적 적었으나 GADA와 IAA 항체의 양성율은 어린 연령에서 높았다. 따라서 비교적 어린 연령에 발생하는 1형 당뇨병에서는 질환을 처음으로 진단할 때자가 항체 유무를 확인하고, 만약 항체가 확인되면 향후 집중적인 인슐린 치료를 시행하여 보다 좋은 예후를 유도하는데 도움이 될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Gale EA. Spring harvest? Reflections on the rise of type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 2005;48:2445–50 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-005-0028-z
  2. Dahlquist G. Can we slow the rising incidence of childhoodonset autoimmune diabetes? The overload hypothesis. Diabetologia 2006:49:20–4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-005-0076-4
  3. Holmberg H, Vaarala O, Sadauskaite-Kuehne V, Ilonen J, Padaiga Z, Ludvigsson J. Higher prevalence of autoantibodies to insulin and GAD65 in Swedish compared to Lithuanian children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2006;72:308-14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2005.10.022
  4. Knip M. Etiopathogenic aspects of type 1 diabetes. In : Chiarelli F, Dahl-Jorgensen K, Keiss W, editors. Diabetes in childhood and adolescence. Philadelphia: Karger Co, 2005;1-27
  5. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1998;21(1 Suppl):5S-19S
  6. Murase Y, Imagawa A, Hanafusa T, Iwahashi H, Uchigata Y, Kanatsuka A, et al. Fulminant type 1 diabetes as a high risk group for diabetic microangiopathy-a nationwide 5-yearstudy in Japan. Diabetologia 2007;50:531-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-006-0575-y
  7. Hermann R, Turpeinen H, Laine AP, Veijola R, Knip M, Simell O, et al. HLA DR-DQ-encoded genetic determinants of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes in Finland: an analysis of 622 nuclear families. Tissue Antigens 2003;62:162–9 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-0039.2003.00071.x
  8. Bennett ST, Lucassen AM, Gough SC, Powell EE, Undlien DE, Pritchard LE, et al. Susceptibility to human type 1 diabetes at IDDM2 is determined by tandem repeat variation at the insulin gene minisatellite locus. Nat Genet 1995;9:284–92 https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0395-284
  9. Ronningen KS, Keiding N, Green A. Correlations between the incidence of childhood-onset type I diabetes in Europe and HLA genotypes. Diabetologia 2001;44 Supp l3:S51–9 https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00002955
  10. Kimpimaki T, Kulmala P, Savola K, Kupila A, Korhonen S, Simell T, et al. Natural history of beta-cell autoimmunity in young children with increased genetic susceptibility to type 1 diabetes recruited from the general population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:4572–9 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-020018
  11. Sabbah E, Savola K, Kumala P. Diabetes-associated autoantibodies in relation to clinical characteristics and natural course in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. The Childhood Diabetes In Finland Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999;84:1534–9 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.84.5.1534
  12. Komulainen J, Kulmala P, Savola K, Lounamaa R, Ilonen J, Reijonen H, et al. Clinical, autoimmune, and genetic characteristics of very young children with type 1 diabetes. Childhood Diabetes in Finland (DiMe) Study Group. Diabetes Care 1999;22:1950-5 https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.22.12.1950
  13. Knip M, Vähäsalo P, Karjalainen J, Lounamaa R, Akerblom HK. Natural history of preclinical IDDM in high risk siblings. Childhood Diabetes in Finland Study Group. Diabetologia 1994;37:388-93 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00408476
  14. Achenbach P, Bonifacio E, Koczwara K, Ziegler AG. Natural history of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2005;54 Suppl 2:S25-31
  15. Pihoker C, Gilliam LK, Hampe CS, Lernmark A. Autoantibodies in diabetes. Diabetes 2005;54 Suppl 2:S52-61
  16. Purohit S, She JX. Biomarkers for type 1 diabetes. Int J Clin Exp Med 2008;1:98-116
  17. Hur J, Lee HS, Hwang JS. Clinical characteristics of type 1 diabetes mellitus at initial diagnosis. J Korean Pediatr Endocrinol 2006;11:177-84
  18. Urakami T, Suzuki J, Yoshida A, Saito H, Wada M, Takahashi S, et al. Autoimmune characteristics in Japanese children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes before 5 years of age. Pediatr Int 2009;51:460-3 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-200X.2008.02758.x
  19. Betterle C, Fusari A, Presotto F, Dal Pra C, Pedini B, Lazzarotto F, et al. Pancreatic autoantibodies in Italian patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus under the age of 20 years. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002;958:271-5 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02985.x
  20. Fakhfakh R, Haddouk S, Hadj Hamida YB, Kamoun T, Ayed MB, Hachicha M, et al. Pancreatic autoantibodies in Tunisian children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. Pathol Biol (Paris) 2008;56:130-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patbio.2007.09.019