DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Evaluation for Participation in Fashion Brand CSR on Brand Identification and Perceived Purchase Value According to Regulatory Focus

사회적 책임활동에 대한 참여평가가 브랜드 동일시 및 구매가치지각에 미치는 영향과 조절초점의 조절효과

  • Yoon, Nam-Hee (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choi, Mi-Young (Dept. of Fashion Design, Duksung Women's University)
  • 윤남희 (서울대학교 의류학과) ;
  • 최미영 (덕성여자대학교 의상디자인학과)
  • Received : 2010.07.19
  • Accepted : 2010.09.03
  • Published : 2010.09.30

Abstract

Consumer expectations for ethical businesses have become increasingly high in recent years; the fashion industry is working to implement greater corporate social responsibility (CSR). This study establishes the effects of the evaluation for participation in fashion brand CSR on perceived purchase values. In particular, the process for the evaluation for participation that affect the perceived purchase value through consumer-brand identifications (personal/social) was verified and how the consumer regulatory focuses would influence this process was identified. For this study, an on-line survey was conducted that included a series of filtering questions that measured the level of social concern of respondents. Valid data from 505 female consumers were analyzed for the structure equation modeling. The empirical results suggested that the evaluation for participation in fashion brand CSR positively affected the two dimensions of consumer-brand identification; personal identification and social identification. In addition, consumer-brand identification played a role as a mediating variable in the path to influence the perceived purchase values of CSR brands. Lastly, there were differences in reactions to CSR activities by consumer groups with different regulatory focuses. The effect of the evaluation for participation in fashion brand CSR was shown to be higher for consumers with promotion focuses than on consumers with prevention focuses. The results of this study will help fashion companies understand the importance of the consumer participation in CSR by having consumers participate in ethical consumption.

Keywords

References

  1. 나준희, 이용학, 박종엽. (2007). 공익제시 유형이 공익연계마케팅의 평가에 미치는 영향. 경영학연구, 36(2), 551-572.
  2. 박은아, 허연주, 유흥구. (2005). 공익연계 광고에서 브랜드-공익의 관련성과 소비자 참여방법이 광고효과에 미치는 영향. 한국방송학보, 19(1), 286-315.
  3. 안광호, 이지은, 전주언. (2008). 명품브랜드-자아동일시가 브랜드 애착과 브랜드 몰입에 미치는 영향-조절초점의 조절효과. 한국마케팅저널, 10(4), 1-33.
  4. 양윤, 전규민. (2009). 성향 및 상황 조절초점이 행동/무행동에 대한 소비자 후회에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 소비자광고, 10(3), 513-533.
  5. 윤남희. (2008). 의복구매 의사결정과정에 나타나는 가격 관련 반응. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.
  6. 이유재, 라선아. (2002) 브랜드 퍼스낼리티-브랜드 동일시-브랜드 자산모형: 이용자와 비이용자 간 차이에 대한 탐색적 연구, 마케팅연구, 17(3), 1-33.
  7. 조형오. (2006). 기업의 공익활동의 유형이 기업에 대한 인지적 반응과 광고메세지에 대한 반응과정에 미치는 영향: 공익적 부합성과 호감도 차원의 매개역할을 중심으로. 광고학연구, 17(5), 91-102.
  8. 최낙환, 박덕수, 나광진. (2009) 기업연상의 긍정적 행동유발효과에 대한 제품소비의 자아표현욕구 충족성과 자아 동일시의 역할. 마케팅관리연구, 14(4), 233-256.
  9. Becker-Olson, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & HiIl, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.01.001
  10. Bhattacharya, C. B., Rao, H., & Glynn, M. A. (1995). Understanding bond of identification: An investigation of its correlates among art museum member. Journal of Marketing, 59(4), 46-57. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252327
  11. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252190
  12. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy Management of Review, 4(4), 497-505.
  13. Chernev, A. (2004). Goal-attribute compatibility in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1-2), 141-150. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_16
  14. Creyer. E. H., & Ross, W. T. (1997). The influence of behavior on purchase intention: Do consumer really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(6), 421-432. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363769710185999
  15. Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decisionmaking. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.2675
  16. Drumwright, M. E. (1996). Company advertising with social dimension: The role of noneconomic criteria. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251902
  17. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  18. Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1993). Monte Carlo evaluations of goodnesss of fit indices for structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testsing structural equation models (pp. 40-65). Newbury Park: Sage.
  19. Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R (1998). The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers' perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavior intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251802
  20. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  21. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
  22. Lichtenstein, D. R, Drumwright, M. E., & Braig, B. M. (2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported non-profits. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.16.42726
  23. Liu, T., Wang, C., & Wu, L. (2010) Moderators of the negativity effect: Commitment, identification, and consumer sensitivity to corporate social performance. Psychology & Marketing, 27(1), 54-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20319
  24. Long, M. M., & Shiffinan, L. G. (2000). Consumption values and relationships: Segmenting the market for frequency programs. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(3), 214-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760010329201
  25. Rio, A. B. D., Vaquez, R, & Iglesias, V. (2001). The effects of brand associations on consumer response. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(4/5), 410-425. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760110398808
  26. Ross, J. K., Patterson, L. T., & Stutts, M. A. (1992). Consumer perception of organizations that use cause relate marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(1), 93-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723480
  27. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Dose doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225-243. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838
  28. Strahilevitz, M. (1999). The effect of product type and donation magnitude on willingness to pay more for a pay charity- linked brand. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 215-241. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0803_02
  29. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245
  30. Underwood, R., Bond, E., & Baer, R (2001). Building service brands via social identity: Lessons from the sports marketplace. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 9(1), 1-13.
  31. Varadarajan. P. R, & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251450