Difference of Pinch Strength According to Testing Posture and Various Flexion Degree of Elbow Joint

  • Received : 2010.08.18
  • Accepted : 2010.10.11
  • Published : 2010.10.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the difference of the pinch strength according to testing posture(standing and sitting) and elbow flexion degree($0^{\circ}$, $45^{\circ}$, $90^{\circ}$ and $135^{\circ}$). Forty normal young adults(male: 20, female: 20, mean age: $22.68{\pm}2.91$ years) participated in this study. The methods of this study were categorized as follows: 1) One set of measurement was performed on four elbow flexion degrees($0^{\circ}$, $45^{\circ}$, $90^{\circ}$ and $135^{\circ}$) in two testing postures(standing and sitting) and all subjects were measured for 3 sets testing procedures in every experimental sessions. 2) Pinch strength in various elbow flexion degree was measured after 2 min rest time, and then each test set was repeatedly performed with 5 min rest time to prevent fatigue of muscles involved in the elbow joint. The result was obtained as follow: 1) In standing posture, there was statistically significant difference at $0^{\circ}$ and $45^{\circ}$, $0^{\circ}$ and $90^{\circ}$, $0^{\circ}$ and $135^{\circ}$, $45^{\circ}$ and $90^{\circ}$, $45^{\circ}$ and $135^{\circ}$, $90^{\circ}$ and $135^{\circ}$. 2) In sitting posture, there was statistically significant difference at $0^{\circ}$ and $45^{\circ}$, $0^{\circ}$ and $90^{\circ}$, $0^{\circ}$ and $135^{\circ}$, $45^{\circ}$ and $90^{\circ}$, $45^{\circ}$ and $135^{\circ}$, $90^{\circ}$ and $135^{\circ}$. 3) Statistically, there was no significant difference between standing and sitting posture in same elbow flexion degree, however pinch strength in standing posture was higher than sitting posture.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim JW, Lee KM. Evaluation of Isometric Shoulder Strength in Korean Adults Using a Hang-Held Dynamometer. J Kor Acad Rehabili Med 1996; 20(1): 186-193.
  2. Smith LK, Weiss EL, Lehmkuhl LD. Brunnstrom's Clinical Kinesiology 5th ed. F.A. Davis Company; 1996.
  3. Kim TS, Park YK, Park YH, Bae SS. The Effect on Grip Strength with Testing Posture and Flexion Degree of Elbow. J Kor Soci Phys Ther 1995; 7(1): 43-49.
  4. Lee CR, Kim KJ, Kim BW. The Effect on Grasp and Pinch Strength According to Degree of Elbow Flexion in Normal Adult. J Kor Acad Orthop Manu Ther 2008; 14(2): 25-33.
  5. Lee HJ, Yi SJ. The Effent on Grip and Pinch Strength with Elbow and Wrist Angle. J Kor Soci Phys Ther 2003; 15(4): 967-973.
  6. Trombly CA. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction 3rd ed. Bltimore; Williams, Wilkins Co; 1989.
  7. Lee SM. A Review of Hand Function. J Acad Kor Phys Ther Sci 2002; 9(4): 155-168.
  8. Nordin M, Frankel VH. Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphaia; 2001: 421- 425.
  9. Hunter JM, Schneider LH, Mackin EJ, Callahan AD. Rehabilitation of hand, St. Louis. CV Mosby; 1984: 101-132.
  10. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, et al. Rehability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg(Am) 1984; 9(2): 222-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(84)80146-X
  11. Nalebuff E, Philips CA. Rehabilitation of the Hand ; Surgery and Therapy, 3rd ed. St. Louis Mosby; 1990.
  12. Pratt PN, Allen AS. Occupational Therapy for Children, 2nd ed. St. Louis, Mosby; 1989: 570- 575.
  13. Oh HW, Park ES. The Standard Value of Hand Grip and Pinch Strength in Preschool and School Age Children. J Kor Associ of Occup Ther 2000; 8(1): 57-75.
  14. Kendall M, McCreary EK. Muscle testing and function. Baltimore ; Williams, Wilkins, as cited; 1991.
  15. Kuzala EA, Vargo MC. The relationship between elbow position and grip strength. Am J Occup Ther 1991; 46(6): 509-512.
  16. Berger R.A: Applied exercise physiology. Philadelphia; Lea, Febiger; 1991: 245-246.
  17. Balogun, JA, Akomolafe, CT, Amusa, LO. Grip strength effect of testing posture and blbow position. Arch Phys Med Rehabili 1982; 72: 280- 283.