근로자에서 인지적 자가훈련 프로그램의 유효성: 예비연구

The Effect of Cognitive Self-training Program in Workers: A Preliminary Study

  • 양동주 (한국산업안전보건공단) ;
  • 양영애 (인제대학교 의과대학 작업치료학과) ;
  • 오성일 (한양대학교 의과대학 신경과학교실) ;
  • 김승현 (한양대학교 의과대학 신경과학교실) ;
  • 김희진 (한양대학교 의과대학 신경과학교실)
  • Yang, Dong-Joo (Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency) ;
  • Yang, Yeong-Ae (Department of Occupational Therapy, Inje University College of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering) ;
  • Oh, Seong-Il (Department of Neurology, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Seung-Hyun (Department of Neurology, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hee-Jin (Department of Neurology, Hanyang University College of Medicine)
  • 발행 : 2010.12.30

초록

Background: It is well known that cognitive training has been shown to improve cognitive abilities in older adults and patient with dementia but the effect of cognitive training to the office workers with normal cognition and social activities has not been demonstrated. Purposes: The purpose of this study is to know whether the cognitive training improved mental abilities in official workers without any subjective cognitive complaints and this effect of cognitive change were different according to ages. Methods: One hundred ten workers (mean age 43.6${\pm}$9.8 yr) participated in this study. All participants performed regularly homework as process of cognitive self-training programs. The Korean version of MMSE (K-MMSE), Korean version of Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA-K) and Work ability index (WAI) were done to evaluate cognitive improvement after 6 months-cognitive self-training programs. Work ability index was also measured to all participants. Results: Cognitive improvement of calculation, immediate recall, and language after cognitive self-training programs have been observed in K-MMSE, MoCA-K and WAIs in young worker group (<45 yr). This suggested that effectiveness of cognitive training program would be different according to age and type of work. Discussion: Cognitive self program might have beneficial effect on the cognition and work ability of workers, especially younger ages.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kaija T, Juhani I, Antti J, Lea K, Arto T. Work ability index, Institute of occupational health. Helsinki 1994: 5-22.
  2. 통계청. 2005 고령자 통계. 사회통계조사서. 2004.
  3. Yang DJ, Kang D, Yang AE, Yu JJ, Kim YH. Improvement of physical fitness and work ability of the middle-aged and aged workers through exercise prescription, J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2009; 19: 297-306.
  4. Brooks JO, Friedman L, Pearman AM, Gray C, Yesavage JA. Mnemonic training in older adults: effects of age, length of training, and type of cognitive pretraining. Int Psychogeriatr 1999; 11: 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610299005608
  5. Willis SL, Tennstedt SL, Marsiske M, Ball K, Elias J, Koepke KM, et al. Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults. JAMA 2006; 296: 2805-14. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.23.2805
  6. Woolf CJ, Salter MW. Neuronal plasticity: increasing the gain in pain. Science 2000; 288: 1765-68. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5472.1765
  7. Moniz-Cook E, Manthorpe J. Early Psychosocial Interventions in Dementia. Evidence-Based Practice. Jessica Kingsley Publishers. 2008.
  8. Kang Y. A normative study of the korean-mini mental state examination (K-MMSE) in the elderly. Korean J Psychology 2006; 25: 1-12.
  9. Lee JY, Lee DW, Cho SJ, Na DL, Jeon HJ, Kim SK, et al. Brief screening for mild cognitive impairment in elderly outpatient clinic: validation of the Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2008; 21: 104-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891988708316855
  10. Lee KH, Kim HK. Limitations of mini mental state examination in assessing cognitive functions of Korean older adults. Korean J Psychology 2008; 27: 859-74.
  11. Nazem S, Siderowf AD, Duda JE, Have TT, Colcher A, Horn SS, et al. Montreal cognitive assessment performance in patients with parkinson's disease with "Normal" global cognition according to mini-mental state examination score. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009; 57: 304-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02096.x
  12. Tuomi K, Huuhtanen P, Nykyri E, Ilmarinen J. "Promotion of work ability, the quality of work and retirement". Occup Med, 2001.
  13. Butters MA, Glisky EL, Schacter DL. Transfer of new learning in memory-impaired patients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1993; 15: 219-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639308402559
  14. Moniz-Cook E, Wood R. The role of memory clinics and psychosocial intervention in the early stage of dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1997; 12: 1143-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199712)12:12<1143::AID-GPS707>3.0.CO;2-F
  15. Jansen DA, Keller ML. Identifying the attentional demands perceived by elderly people. Rehabil Nurs 1998; 23: 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2048-7940.1998.tb01751.x
  16. Rohlman DS, Bailey SR, Brown M, Blanock M, Anger WK, McCauley L. Establishing stable test performance in tests from the Behavioral Assessment and Research System (BARS). Neurotoxicology 2000; 21: 715-23.