Clinical Analysis of Microsurgery for Brainstem Cavernous Malformations: Surgical Indications, Optimal Approaches, and Clinical Outcomes

  • Kim, Byeong-Woo (Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Whan (Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Huh, Seung-Kon (Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Kyu-Chang (Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • Published : 2010.09.30

Abstract

Objective : This study aimed to analyze patients who underwent microsurgery for brainstem cavernous malformations (BCMs) and to investigate the effectiveness and the limitations of surgical resection of BCMs. Methods : We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients who underwent surgical resections for BCMs between 1989 and 2010. We investigated the age distribution, preoperative hemorrhagic rates, initial clinical presentations, locations of the lesions, and preoperative and postoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores. We also analyzed surgical indications, the timing of surgery, and surgical approaches. Results : All 15 patients underwent microsurgery for BCMs; 13 underwent total resection of their lesions, but 2 underwent incomplete resections and consequently experienced postoperative recurrent hemorrhage. We observed 11 patients through a complete follow-up, for a mean of 53.1 months (range 1-131 months) after diagnosis (nine patients > 24 months follow-up). During the follow-up periods, 3 patients were lost to follow-up, and one patient expired, due to aspiration pneumonia, 31 months postoperatively. The mean preoperative KPS score was 50, and the mean postoperative KPS score was 67. During the complete follow-up period, 3 patients recovered completely (KPS scores of 90-100) and 7 patients (63.6%) showed improvement in KPS scores. Conclusions : Surgeons should consider microsurgery for BCMs the treatment of choice for patients who suffer from progressive neurological decline. Successful resection of BCMs depends on an optimal surgical approach, appropriate timing of surgery, and well-informed surgical techniques. The aim of surgery must be total resection of the lesions without any deteriorative neurological morbidity.

Keywords

References

  1. Aiba T, Tanaka R, Koike T, Kameyama S, Takeda N, Komata T. Natural history of intracranial cavernous malformations. Journal of neurosurgery 83:56-9, 1995 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1995.83.1.0056
  2. Bertalanffy H, Benes L, Miyazawa T, Alberti O, Siegel AM, Sure U. Cerebral cavernomas in the adult. Review of the literature and analysis of 72 surgically treated patients. Neurosurgical review 25:1-53, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1007/s101430100179
  3. Clatterbuck RE, Moriarity JL, Elmaci I, Lee RR, Breiter SN, Rigamonti D. Dynamic nature of cavernous malformations: A prospective magnetic resonance imaging study with volumetric analysis. Journal of neurosurgery 93:981-6, 2000 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.93.6.0981
  4. Cristini A, Fischer C, Sindou M. Tectal plate cavernoma-a special entity of brainstem cavernomas: Case report. Surgical neurology 61:474-8, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-3019(03)00487-7
  5. Di Rocco C, Iannelli A, Tamburrini G. Cavernous angiomas of the brain stem in children. Pediatric Neurosurgery 27:92-9, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1159/000121233
  6. Fahlbusch R, Strauss C, Huk W, Rckelein G, Kmpf D, Ruprecht KW. Surgical removal of pontomesencephalic cavernous hemangiomas. Neurosurgery 26:449-56, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199003000-00012
  7. Garrett M, Spetzler RF. Surgical treatment of brainstem cavernous malformations. Surg Neurol 72 Suppl 2:S3-9;discussion S-10, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2009.05.031
  8. Huang AP, Chen J, Yang C, Wang K, Yang S, Lai D, et al. Brain stem cavernous malformations. Journal of clinical neuroscience 17:74-9
  9. Karlsson B, Kihlstrm L, Lindquist C, Ericson K, Steiner L. Radiosurgery for cavernous malformations. Journal of neurosurgery 88:293-7, 1998 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.88.2.0293
  10. Kim DS, Park YG, Choi JU, Chung SS, Lee KC. An analysis of the natural history of cavernous malformations. Surgical neurology 48:9-17, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-3019(96)00425-9
  11. Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Flickinger JC, Kestle JR. Reduction of hemorrhage risk after stereotactic radiosurgery for cavernous malformations. Journal of neurosurgery 83:825-31, 1995 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1995.83.5.0825
  12. Kupersmith MJ, Kalish H, Epstein F, Yu G, Berenstein A, Woo H, et al. Natural history of brainstem cavernous malformations. Neurosurgery 48:47-53, 2001
  13. Kyoshima K, Kobayashi S, Gibo H, Kuroyanagi T. A study of safe entry zones via the floor of the fourth ventricle for brainstem lesions. Report of three cases. Journal of neurosurgery 78:987-93, 1993 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1993.78.6.0987
  14. Li H, Ju Y, Cai B, Chen J, You C, Hui X. Experience of microsurgical treatment of brainstem cavernomas: Report of 37 cases. Neurology India 57:269-73, 2009 https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.53269
  15. Mathiesen T, Edner G, Kihlstrm L. Deep and brainstem cavernomas: A consecutive 8-year series. Journal of neurosurgery 99:31-7, 2003 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2003.99.1.0031
  16. Moriarity JL, Clatterbuck RE, Rigamonti D. The natural history of cavernous malformations. Neurosurgery clinics of North America 10:411-7, 1999
  17. Porter RW, Detwiler PW, Spetzler RF, Lawton MT, Baskin JJ, Derksen PT, et al. Cavernous malformations of the brainstem: Experience with 100 patients. Journal of neurosurgery 90:50-8, 1999 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1999.90.1.0050
  18. Robinson JR, Awad IA, Little JR. Natural history of the cavernous angioma. Journal of neurosurgery 75:709-14, 1991 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1991.75.5.0709
  19. Wang C, Liu A, Zhang J, Sun B, Zhao Y. Surgical management of brain-stem cavernous malformations: Report of 137 cases. Surgical neurology 59 444-54, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-3019(03)00187-3