A Validity Study of K-MMSE as a Screening Test for Dementia: Comparison Against a Comprehensive Neuropsychological Evaluation

치매선별검사로서 K-MMSE의 타당도 연구: 종합적인 신경심리학적 평가와의 비교

  • Oh, Eun-A (Department of Psychology, Hallym University) ;
  • Kang, Yeon-Wook (Department of Psychology, Hallym University) ;
  • Shin, Joon-Hyun (Department of Neurology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Yeon, Byeong-Kil (Department of Neuropsychiatry, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital)
  • Published : 2010.03.31

Abstract

Background: Although the Korean-Mini Mental Status Examination (K-MMSE) has been widely used for screening dementia in clinics and other community settings, there has been little investigation into the validity of the K-MMSE. The present study was conducted to examine the validity of the K-MMSE as a dementia screening tool compared against a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation. Methods: The subjects were 707 outpatients $(261\;men, 446 women;\;mean\;age=70.3{\pm}6.3\;yr,\;mean\;education=\;6.3{\pm}5.1\;yr)$ who visited the neurology or psychiatry department with complaints of cognitive dysfunction. They were given the K-MMSE and a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery (Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery, SNSB). The subjects were classified into "Cognitive Impairment" and "No Cognitive Impairment" groups based on the SNSB as well as the K-MMSE. Results: The agreement between classification based on the K-MMSE and the SNSB was examined. The sensitivity of K-MMSE for detecting cognitive impairments was 80.3% and the specificity was 70.3% (Positive predictive value 90.4%; Negative predictive value 50.7%). The false-positive rate was found to be higher for the subjects with low education. The majority of the subjects in the false-negative group showed prominent frontal/executive dysfunctions as well as memory impairment. Conclusions: These results showed that K-MMSE has high positive- and negative-false rates and a low negative predictive power. They suggest that the K-MMSE should be given with memory and frontalexecutive function tests for improving screening accuracy for dementia.

Keywords

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.
  2. Cummings JL, Benson DF. Dementia: a clinical approach. (2nd ed.). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1992.
  3. Chin JH, Kang Y. Neuropsychological Assessment. In: Korean Dementia Association. Dementia: A clinical approach. Seoul: Academia Publishing Co., 2006; 75-95.
  4. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. ''Mini-Mental Sate'': a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
  5. Lancu I, Olmer A. The minimental state examination: an up-to-date review. Harefuah 2006; 145: 687-90.
  6. Bondi MW, Salmon DP, Kaszniak AW. The neuropsychology of dementia. In: Grant I, Adams KM. Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatric disorders. New York: Oxford University Press. 1996; 164-99.
  7. Kang Y, Na DL, Hahn SH. A validity study on the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) in dementia patients. J Korean Neurol Assoc 1997; 15: 300-7.
  8. Park JH, Kwon YC. Standardization of Korean of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-K) for use in the elderly. Part II. Diagnostic Validity. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 1989; 28: 508-13.
  9. Nelson A, Fogel BS, Faust D. Bedside cognitive screening instruments. A critical assessment. J Nerv Ment Dis 1986; 174: 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198602000-00002
  10. Kang Y. A normative study of the Korean-Mini Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) in the elderly. Korean J Psychol 2006; 25: 1-12.
  11. Fillenbaum GG, Hughes DC, Heyman A, George LK, Blazer DG. Relation of health and demographic characteristics to Mini-Mental State Examination score among community residents. Psychol Med 1988; 18: 719-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700008412
  12. O'Conner DW, Pollitt PA, Treasure FP, Brook CPB, Reiss BB, et al. The influence of education, social class and sex on Mini-Mental State score. Psychol Med 1989; 19: 771-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700024375
  13. Kang Y, Na DL. Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB). Incheon: Human Brain Research & Consulting Co., 2003.
  14. O'Conner DW, Pollitt, PA, Hyde JB, Fellows JL, Miller, ND, Brook, CPB, et al. The reliability and validity of the Mini-Mental State in a British community survey. J Psychiatr Res 1989; 23: 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(89)90021-6
  15. Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini-mental state examination: A comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992; 40: 922-35.
  16. Axelrod BN, Goldman RS, Henry RR. Sensitivity of the Mini-Mental State Examination to frontal lobe dysfunction in normal aging. J Clin Psychol 1992; 48: 68-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(199201)48:1<68::AID-JCLP2270480110>3.0.CO;2-N
  17. Hoops S, Nazem S, Siderowf AD, Duda JE, Xie SX, Stern MB, et al. Validity of the MoCA and MMSE in the detection of MCI and dementia in Parkinson disease. Neurology 2009; 73: 1738-45. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c34b47