References
- Buksa, A., Tudor, M. and Martinovic, D., 2005, “Research of The Failure Incidences In the Diesel-Engine Propulsion System,” 9th International Conference on Traffic Science, pp. 14-15.
- Hansson, L. and Kiaer, E., 1997, Technical Failures, System Criticality Ranking, SAFECO Work Package II.6, MARINTEK Report No. MT23 F96-0360/233509.00.01.
- IMO, 2008a, Consideration of the GBS Generic Structure(MSC 84/5/4).
- IMO, 2008b, FSA-RoPax Ships(MSC 85/17/2).
- IMO, 2008c, Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment for use in the IMO Rule-making Process(MSC Circ 1023).
- IMO, 2006a, Guidelines on Alternative Design and Arrangements for SOLAS Chapter II-1 and III(MSC Circ 1212).
- IMO, 2006b, SOLAS Regulations II-2/21.4
- IMO, 2006c, SOLAS Regulations II-2/21.5.1.2
- Lee, J.O., Yeo, I.C. and Yang, Y.S., 2001, “A Trial Application of FSA Methodology to the Hatchway Watertight Integrity of Bulk Carriers,” Marine Structures, Vol. 14, pp. 651-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8339(01)00007-7
- SAFEDOR, 2005, “Risk Evaluation Criteria”, SAFEDOR Deliverable D4.5.2.
- Svein Kristiansen, 2005, MARITIME TRANSPORTATION, ELSEVIER, Burlington, M.A..
- www.safedor.org.
Cited by
- Integration of Ontology Model and Product Structure for the Requirement Management of Building Specification vol.48, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2011.48.3.207
- A Study on the Hole-Plan system combined with 3D CAD vol.13, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2012.13.1.1
- Research of Risk Assessment for Retrofitting an Ozone Treatment Type Ballast Water Treatment System on an Existing Vessel vol.30, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2018.06.30.3.923