DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Detection of Pathotypes and Genetic Diversity of Cercospora beticola

  • Received : 2010.06.07
  • Accepted : 2010.10.12
  • Published : 2010.12.01

Abstract

The pathotypes of Cercospora beticola, causal agent of sugar beet leaf spot disease, were identified by application of pathogenicity test using 100 isolates obtained from the provinces with intensive sugar beet cultivation. For the identification of pathotypes, five sugar beet cultivars were used each with different resistance factors. Cultivar reactions were determined by inoculation of cultivars with the isolates under controlled conditions and measuring disease severity on the $15^{th}$ day according to the 1-9 KWS Scale. Based on the reactions of the five cultivars, a total of 15 pathotypes were detected. All employed sugar beet cultivars were resistant to Pathotype no:1 comprising most of the isolates. Genetic diversity of the causal agent was characterized by AFLP reaction. The products acquired at the end of AFLP reaction were detected by means of Beckman CEQ 8800 DNA Capillary Series Analysis and the results obtained were evaluated according to the similarity index UPGMA. For the genetic analysis of C. beticola isolates, 9874 polymorphic fragments of sizes between 100 and 500 bp were analysed which were generated by nine primers. The dendrogram derived from AFLP analysis depicted the existence of five different subgroups. The polymorphism rate among isolates was 91.13% and the dendrogram distribution of the pathotypes obtained by pathogenicity indicated that pathotypes were not discriminated and did not compose any groups.

Keywords

References

  1. Bargabus, R. L., Zidack, N. K., Sherwood, J. E. and Jacobsen, B. J. 2004. Screening for the identification of potential biological control agents that induce systemic acquired resistance in sugar beet. Biological. Control 30:342-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2003.11.005
  2. Cai, G. and Schneider, R. W. 2005. Vegetative compatibility groups in Cercospora kikuchii, the causal agent of cercospora leaf blight and purple seed stain in soybean. Phytopathology 95:257-261. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-95-0257
  3. Duffus, J. E. and Ruppel, E. G. 1993. Disease. In: Cooke D.A., Scott R.K., Eds, The Sugar Beet Crop. Chapman and Hall. London, pp. 347-427.
  4. Groenewald, M., Groenewald, J. Z. and Crous, P. W. 2005. Distinct species exist within the Cercospora apii morphotype. Phtopathology 95:951-959. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-95-0951
  5. Goodwin, S. B., Waalwijk, C., Kema G. H. J., Cavaletto, J. R. and Zhang, G. 2003. Cloning and analysis of the mating-type idiomorphs from the barley pathogen Septoria passerinii. Mol. Genet. Genomics 269:1-12.
  6. Kruskal, W. H. and Wallis, W. A. 1952. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 47:583-621. https://doi.org/10.2307/2280779
  7. Lewellen, R. T. and Whitney, E. D. 1976. Inheritance of resistance to race C2 of C. beticola in sugar beet. Crop. Sci. 16:558-561. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1976.0011183X001600040032x
  8. Milgroom, M. G. 1996. Recombination and the multilocus structure of fungal populations. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol 34:457-477. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.34.1.457
  9. Moretti, M., Saracchi, M. and Farina, G. 2004. Morphological, physiological and genetic diversity within a small population of Cercospora beticola Sacc. Ann. Microbiol. 54:129-150.
  10. Moretti, M., Karaoglanldls, G., Saracchl, M., Fontana, A. and Farrlna, G. 2006. Analysis of genotypic diversity in Cercospora beticola Sacc. field isolates. Annals of Microbiology 56:215-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03175008
  11. Nilsson, N. O., Hansen, M., Panagopoulos, A. H., Tuvesson, S., Ehlde, M., Christiansson, M., Rading, I. M., Rissler, M. and Kraft, T. 1999. QTL analysis of Cercospora leaf spot resistance in sugar beet. Plant Breeding 118:327-334. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.1999.00390.x
  12. Okori, P., Rubaihayo, P. R., Ekwamu, A., Fahleson, J. and Dixelius, C. 2004. Genetic characterization of Cercospora sorghi from cultivated and wild sorghum and its relationship to other Cercospora fungi. Phytopathology 94:743-750. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.7.743
  13. Ozgur, O. E. (Sugar beet disease in Turkey, TSFAS, Filiz Matbaasl, Ankara.Yayln No. 219, 2003, pp. 192). (In Turkish).
  14. Ruppel, E. G. 1972. Variation among isolates of Cercospora beticola from sugar beet. Phytopathology 62:134-136. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-62-134
  15. Salamati, S., Zhan, J., Burdon, J. J. and McDonald, B. A. 2000. The genetic structure of field populations of Rhynchosporium secalis from three continents suggests moderate gene flow and regular recombination. Phytopathology 90:901-908. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.8.901
  16. Sanders, I. 1999. No sex please, we are fungi. Nature 399:737-739. https://doi.org/10.1038/21544
  17. Setiawan, A., Koch, G., Barnes, S. R. and Jung, C. 2000. MApping quantitative trait loci (QTL) for resistance to Cercospora leaf spot disease (Cercospora beticola Sacc.) in sugarbeet. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100:1176-1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051421
  18. Shane, W. W. and Teng, P. S. 1992. Impact of Cercospora leaf spot on root weight, sugar yield, and purity of Beta vulgaris. Plant Dis. 76:812-820. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-76-0812
  19. Solel, Z. and Wahl, I. 1971. Pathogenic Specialization of C. beticola. Phytopathology 61:1081-1083. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-61-1081
  20. Sorensen, T. 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Vidensk Selsk Biol. Skr. 5:1-34.
  21. Van der Waals, J. E., Korsten, L. and Slippers, B. 2004. Genetic diversity among Alternaria solani isolates from potatoes in South Africa. Plant Dis. 88:959-964.
  22. Vereijssen, J. 2004. Cercospora leaf spot in sugar beet. Epidemiology, life cycle components and disease management. Wageningen, The Netherlands, Wageningen University, PhD Thesis.
  23. Vilgalys, R. and Gonzalez, D. 1990. Ribosomal DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms in Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology 80:151-158. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-80-151
  24. Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., Vander Lee, T., Hones, M., Frijters, A. and Pot, J. 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:4407-4414. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/23.21.4407
  25. Weiland, J., Eide, J., Rivera-Varas, V. and Secor, G. 2001. Genetic diversity of Cercospora beticola in the U.S. and association of molecular markers with tolerance to the fungicide triphenyltin hydroxide (TPTH). Phytopathology 91: 94.
  26. Weiland, J. and Koch, G. 2004. Sugarbeet leaf spot disease (Cercospora beticola Sacc.). Mol. Plant Pathology 5:157-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2004.00218.x
  27. Weising, K., Nybom, H., Wolff, K. and Meyer, W. Eds. 1995. DNA fingerprinting in plants and fungi. CRC Press, Boca Raton USA (ISNB: 0-8493-8920-8).
  28. Whitney, E. D. and Lewellen, R. T. 1974. Physiological race of Cercospora beticola on Beta vulgaris Proc. Am. Phytopathol. Soc. 1:88-89.
  29. Zamani, M. R., Motallebi, M. and Rostamian, A. 2004. Characterization of Iranian isolates of Fusarium oxysporum on the basis of RAPD analysis, pathogenicity, and vegetative compatibility. J. Phytopathol. 152:499-503.

Cited by

  1. Genetic structure of various Magnaporthe oryzae populations in Iran and Uruguay vol.43, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-013-0269-0
  2. Genotypic Diversity and Resistance to Azoxystrobin of Cercospora beticola on Processing Table Beet in New York vol.100, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-15-1014-RE
  3. De novo genome assembly of Cercospora beticola for microsatellite marker development and validation vol.26, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2017.01.006
  4. Genetic structure of Cercospora beticola populations on Beta vulgaris in New York and Hawaii vol.7, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01929-4
  5. Populations in New York Table Beet Fields pp.0191-2917, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-01-18-0175-RE