International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering

  • 제2권4호
  • /
  • Pages.200-210
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 2092-6782(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-6790(eISSN)
대한조선학회 (The Society of Naval Architects of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of hot spot stress evaluation methods for welded structures

  • Seo, Jung-Kwan (The Lloyd's Register Educational Trust (LRET) Research Centre of Excellence, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Hyun (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Shin, Sang-Beom (Hyundai Heavy Industries) ;
  • Han, Myung-Soo (Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering) ;
  • Park, June-Soo (Korea Power Engineering Company) ;
  • Mahendr, Mahen (Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering, Queensland University of Technology) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Myung (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University)
  • 발행 : 2010.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this paper, different evaluation methods of Hot Spot Stresses (HSS) have been applied to four different welded structure details in order to compare them and to illustrate their differences. The HSSs at failure-critical locations were calculated by means of a series of finite element analyses. There was good overall agreement between calculated and experimentally determined HSS on the critical locations. While different methods and procedures exist for the computation of the structural hot-spot stress at welded joints, the recommendations within the International Institute of Welding (IIW) guideline concerning the 'Hot Spot Stress' approach were found to give good reference stress approximations for fatigue-loaded welded joints. This paper recommends and suggests an appropriate finite element modeling and hot spot stress evaluation technique based on round-robin stress analyses and experimental results of several welded structure details.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ANSYS, 2006. User’s Manual, Houston: Swanson Analysis Systems Inc.
  2. American Bureau of Shipping (ABS), 1992. Guide for fatigue strength assessment of tankers, Part 3 Steel Vessel Rules. American Bureau of Shipping, New York.
  3. Det Norske Veritas (DNV), 2008. Fatigue Design of Offshore Steel Structures. Recommended Practice DNV-RP-C203, Det Norske Veritas.
  4. Doerk, O., Fricke, W. and Weissenborn, C., 2003. Comparison of different calculation methods for structural stresses at welded joints. International Journal of Fatigue, 25(5), pp. 359-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00167-6
  5. Dong, P., 2001. A structural stress definition and numerical implementation for fatigue analyses. International Journal of Fatigue, 23(10), pp. 865-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00055-X
  6. Dong, P. Hong, J.K. and Cao, Z., 2002. Structural stress based master S–N curve for welded joints. IIW Doc. XIII-1930-02/XV-1119-02. International Institute of Welding.
  7. Eurocode 9, 1998. Design of aluminum structures - Part 2: Structures susceptible to fatigue. EN 1999-2:1998 E, British Standard, London.
  8. Fricke, W., 2002. Evaluation of Hot Spot Stresses in Complex Welded Structures. Proceedings of the IIW Fatigue Seminar, Tokyo Institute of Technology.
  9. Fricke, W. and Kahl, A., 2005. Comparison of different structural stress approaches for fatigue assessment of welded ship structures. Marine Structures, 18, pp. 473-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2006.02.001
  10. Fricke, W. Petershagen, H. and Paetzold, H., 1998. Fatigue Strength of Ship Structures-Expample. GL-Technology, 1/1998, Germanischer Lloyd, Hamburg, Germany.
  11. HKS, 2007. ABAQUS User’s manual, Pawtucket, RI.
  12. Hobbacher, A., 2009. The new IIW recommendations for fatigue assessment of welded joints and components - A comprehensive code recently updated. International Journal of Fatigue, 31(1), pp. 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.04.002
  13. Hobbacher A. (Ed), 2009. Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components. IIW doc. XIII-1823-07. Welding Research Council Bulletin 520, New York.
  14. I-DEAS, 1993. I-DEAS, FEM User’s Guide , SDRC, Ohio.
  15. Niemi, E., (Ed). 1995. Stress determination for fatigue analysis of welded components, IIW Doc XIII-1221-93. International Institute of Welding, Cambridge, Abington.
  16. Petershagen, H. Fricke, W. and Massel, T., 1991. Application of the local approach to the fatigue strength assessment of welded structures in ship. IIW Doc. XIII-1409-91. International Institute of Welding.
  17. Radaj, D., 1990. Design and analysis of fatigue-resistant welded structures. Abington Pub. Cambridge.
  18. Xiao, Z.G. and Yamada, K., 2004. A method of determining geometric stress for fatigue strength evaluation of steel welded joints. International Journal of Fatigue, 26(12), pp. 1277–93.

피인용 문헌

  1. Fatigue crack and its retrofitting method in a curved I girder bridge vol.12, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-012-4011-5
  2. Numerical investigation of the cope hole shape impact on fatigue life of welded joints in steel bridges vol.252, pp.2261-236X, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925207008