한국육종학회지 (Korean Journal of Breeding Science)

  • 제41권4호
  • /
  • Pages.568-573
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 0250-3360(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-5174(eISSN)
한국육종학회 (The Korean Society of Breeding Science)
권호 표지

분자표지선발(MAS)을 이용한 콩모자이크병 저항성 신품종 "신강"

A New Variety "Singang" with resistance to Soybean Mosaic Virus by Molecular Marker Assisted Selection

  • 투고 : 2009.11.07
  • 발행 : 20091200
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

신강은 콩나물 적성이 뛰어나고 농업형질이 우수하나 콩모자이크병에 약한 소원콩을 반복친으로, 콩모자이크병 저항성 유전자 Rsv3을 보유한 L29를 일회친으로 사용하여 육성된 품종이다. 육성기간의 단축을 위하여 분자표지선발법을 사용하여 목표유전자의 도입과 반복친의 회복정도를 신속히 확인함으로써 품종 개발에 소요되는 기간을 7년으로 단축하였다. 신강의 주요 특성을 요약하면 다음과 같다. 1. 유한신육형이며, 꽃색은 자색이고 엽형은 피침형이다. 입형은 구형이고 종피색은 황색, 배꼽색은 담갈색이며 100립중은 11.0 g으로 다소 가볍다. 2. 개화기는 7월 30일, 성숙기는 10월 7일로 풍산나물콩에 비하여 다소 빠른 중만생종이다. 3. 콩 모자이크병, 미이라병 및 노균병에 대해 강한 저항성을 보였다. 4. 콩나물 재배 특성으로는 부패립 발생이 거의 없고, 콩나물 수율은 635%로 풍산나물콩에 비해 다소 높다. 5. 3개년간의 지역적응시험 결과 풍산나물콩 대비 동등한 수량을 나타내었다.

A new soybean variety, "Singang", was released by NICS, RDA in 2008. It is resistant to soybean mosic virus (SMV), which is one of the most serious diseases in soybean production. "Singang" had been developed for seven years by molecular marker-assisted selection (MAS) breeding method using recurrent parent, "Sowon", and donor parent, "L29" which has the SMV-resistance gene, Rsv3. Selected promising breeding line, Suwon 242, was evaluated in yield trials for 2 years from 2005 to 2006 at NICS. Regional yield trials were performed for 3 years from 2006 to 2008 in five locations including Jeju. Agronomic characteristics of "Singang" is a determinate growth habit, purple flower color, grey pubescence, yellow testa, light brown hilum and lanceolate leaflet shape. "Singang" showed the similar performance to "Sowon" cultivar. This variety showed 3 days shorter in days to maturity than the check variety (Pungsannamul). The average yield under regional yield trials in five location was 2.78t/ha. It is adaptable to the whole country except for Gangwon province.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 농촌진흥청

참고문헌

  1. Buzzell, R.I., and J.C. Tu. 1989. Inheritance of a soybean stem-tip necrosis reaction to soybean mosaic virus. J. Hered. 80:400-401
  2. Chen Y, Xue B, Hu Y, Fang Z. 1986. Identification of two new strains of soybean mosaic virus. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica 13:221-226
  3. Cho EK, Choi SH, Cho WT. 1983. Newly recognized Soybean mosaic virus mutants and sources of resistance in soybeans. Res. Rep. ORD (S.P.M.U.). 25:18-22
  4. Cho EK, Goodman RM. 1979. Strains of soybean mosaic virus: Classification based on virulence in resistant soybean cultivars. Phytopathology 69:469-470
  5. Gore MA, Hayes AJ, Jeong SC, Yue YG, Buss GR, Saghai Maroof MA. 2002. Mapping tightly linked genes controlling potyvirus infection at the Rsv1 and Rpv1 region in soybean. Genome 45:592-599 https://doi.org/10.1139/g02-009
  6. Gunduz, I., G.R. Buss, P. Chen, and S.A. Tolin. 2002. Characterization of SMV resistance genes in Tousan 140 and Hourei soybean. Crop Sci. 42:90-95 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.0090
  7. Guo DQ, Zhi HJ, Wang YW, Gai JY, Zhou XA, Yang CL, Li K, Li HC. 2005. Identification and distribution of soyabean mosaic virus strains in Middle and Northern Huang-Huai Region of China. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences 27(4):64-68
  8. Hayes AJ, Saghai Maroof M.A. 2000. Targeted resistance gene mapping in soybean using modified AFLPs Theor Appl Genet 100:1279-1283 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051435
  9. Kim JS, Lee EJ. 1991. A new virulent strain of Soybean mosaic virus infecting SMV resistant soybean cultivar, Deogyou. Korea J. Plant Pathol. 7:37-41
  10. Kim YH, Kim OS, Lee BC, Moon JK, Lee SC, Lee JY. 2003. G7H, a New Soybean mosaic virus Strain: Its Virulence and Nucleotide Sequence of CI Gene. Plant Disease 87: 1372-1375 https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.11.1372
  11. Koo JM, Choi BK, Ahn HJ, Yum HJ, Choi CW. 2005. First report of an Rsv resistance-breaking isolate of Soybean mosaic virus in Korea. Plant Pathology 54:573
  12. Liao, L. P. Chen, G.R. Buss, Q. Yang, and S.A. Tolin. 2002. Inheritance and allelism of resistance to soybean mosaic virus in Zao 18 soybean from China. J. Hered. 93:447-452 https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/93.6.447
  13. L$\"{u}$ W, Zhang M. Wei P. 1985. Types and distribution of soybean mosaic virus in Northeast China. Acta Phytopa thologica Sinica 15(4):225-228
  14. Ma G, Chen P, Buss GR, and Tolin SA, 1995. Genetic characteristics of two genes for resistance to soybean mosaic virus in PI486355 soybean. Theor Appl Genet 91:907-914 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223899
  15. Ma, G., P. Chen, G.R. Buss, and S.A. Tolin. 2002. Complementary action of two independent dominant genes in Columbia soybean for resistance to soybean mosaic virus. J. Hered. 93:179-184 https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/93.3.179
  16. Pu Z, Cao Q, Fang D, Xi B, Fang C. 1982. Identification of strains of soybean mosaic virus. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica 9:15-20
  17. Saghai Maroof MA, Jeong SC, Gunduz I, Tucker DM, Buss GR, Tolin SA. 2008. Pyramiding of soybean mosaic virus resistance genes by marker-assisted selection. Crop Sci 48:517-526 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.08.0479
  18. Shi A, Chen P, Li DX. Zheng C, Hou A, Zhang B. 2008a. Genetic confirmation of 2 independent genes for resistance to soybean mosaic virus in J05 soybean using SSR markers. J Hered 99:598-603 https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esn035
  19. Shi A, Chen P, Zheng C, Hou A, Zhang B. 2008b. A PCR-based marker for the rsv1 locus conferring resistance to soybean mosaic virus. Crop Sci 48:262-268 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.02.0076
  20. Takahashi K, Tanaka T, Iida W. Tsuda Y. 1980. Studies on virus disease and causal viruses of soybean in Japan. Bull Tohoku Natl Agric Exp Stn 62:1-130
  21. Wang XQ, Gai JY, Pu ZQ. 2003. Classification and distribution of strain groups of soybean mosaic virus in middle and lower Huang-Huai and Changjiang Valleys. Soybean Science 22(2):102-107
  22. Zheng C, Chang R, Qiu L, Chen P, Wu X, Chen S. 2003. Identification and characterization of a RAPD/SCAR marker linked to a resistance gene for soybean mosaic virus in soybean. Euphytica 132:199-210 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024682415598