Acknowledgement
Supported by : Korea Research Foundation
References
- Avery, T. E. and H. E. Burkhart. 1994. Forest measurements, 4th edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. 408 p.
- Brooks, J. R., L. Jiang, and R. Ozcelik. 2008. Compatible stem volume and taper equations for Brutian pine, Cedar of Lebanon, and Cilicica fir in Turkey. For. Ecol. Manage. 256:147-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.018
- Coble, D. W. and H. V. Wiant, Jr. 2000. Centroid method: comparison of simple and complex proxy tree taper functions. For. Sci. 46(4):473-477.
- Devore, J. L. 1982. Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences. Brooks/Cole Pub. Co., Monterey, CA. pp. 513.
- Gray, H. R. 1956. The form and taper of forest trees. Imperial Forestry Institute, Oxford, U.K. Paper 32.
- Gregoire, T. G., H. T. Valentine, and G. M. Furnival. 1986. Estimation of bole volume by importance sampling. Can. J. For. Res. 16:554-557. https://doi.org/10.1139/x86-096
- Jiang, L., J. R. Brooks, and J. Wang. 2005. Compatible taper and volume equations for yellow-poplar in West Virginia. For. Ecol. Manage. 213: 399-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.04.006
- Korea Forest Research Institute. 2008. Forest Resources Evaluation and Prediction Program.
- Korea Forest Service. 2003. Statistical yearbook of forestry.
- Max, T. A. and H. E. Burkhart. 1976. Segmented polynomial regression applied to taper equations. For. Sci. 22(3): 283-289.
- Patterson, D. W., H. V. Wiant, Jr., and G. B. Wood. 1993. Comparison of the centroid method and taper systems for estimating tree volumes. NJAF 10(1): 89.
- Rauscher, H. M. 1986. Testing prediction accuracy. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-107. 19 p.
- Reynolds, M. R. 1984. Estimating the error in model prediction. For. Sci. 30: 454-469.
- SAS. 1998. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6.03. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. 1028 p.
- Wiant, H. V., Jr., G. B. Wood, and M. S. Williams. 1996. Comparison of three modern methods for estimating volume of sample trees using one or two diameter measurements. For. Ecol. Manage. 83: 13-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(96)03708-5
- Wiant, H. V., Jr., G. B. Wood, and T. G. Gregoire. 1992. Practical guide for estimating the volume of a standing sample tree using either importance or centroid sampling. For. Ecol. Manage. 49: 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(92)90144-X
- Wiant, H. V., Jr., G. B. Wood, and R. R. Forslund. 1991. Comparison of centroid and paracone estimates of tree volume. Can. J. For. Res. 21(5): 714-717. https://doi.org/10.1139/x91-099
- Williams, M.S. and H. V. Wiant, Jr. 1998. Double sampling with importance sampling to eliminate bias in tree volume estimation of the centroid method. For. Ecol. Manage. 104: 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00257-0
- Wood, G. B. and H. V. Wiant, Jr. 1992. Test of application of centroid and importance sampling in a point-3P forest inventory. For. Ecol. Manage. 53: 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(92)90038-B
- Wood, G. B. and H. V. Wiant, Jr. 1990. Estimating the volume of Australian hardwoods using centroid sampling. Australian Forestry 53(4): 271-274.
- Wood, G. B., H. V. Wiant, Jr., R. J. Loy, and J. A. Miles. 1990. Centroid sampling: a variant of importance sampling for estimating the volume of sample trees of radiata pine. For. Ecol. Manage. 36: 233-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(90)90027-9