DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Rainfastness of 5 Fungicides on the Leaf Surface of Hot Pepper

고추잎 표면에서 5종 살균제의 내우성

  • Choi, Yun-Kyong (Seoul Pharma Laboratories, Inc.) ;
  • Yu, Ju-Hyun (Chemical Biotechnology Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Chun, Jae-Chul (Department of Agricultural Chemistry Graduate School, Jeonbuk National University)
  • Published : 2009.09.30

Abstract

In order to elucidate the relationship between the rainfastness of fungicides and their water solubilities, the fungicide residues on the leaf surface of hot pepper was assessed and compared after the drop-wise applications of fungicide solutions on leaf surface followed by artificial raining. As the raining was progressed after application of aqueous acetone solution of fungicides, the residue levels of fungicides were drop rapid at the early stage of raining, but the decreasing rates of residue level were slowed down thereafter. The initial rainfastness was reversely proportional to the water solubilities of the fungicides. Whole amount of dimethomorph residue, which water solubility is 18 mg/L, was washed off by 2.5 mm of raining. Although WP formulations of fungicides showed remarkable decreases of rainfastness compared to the aqueous acetone formulations, the fungicides having low water solubility showed better rainfastness. Chlorothalonil and mepanipyrim suspension concentrates was better in rainfastness than their WP formulation, and the rainfastness of mepanipyrim suspension was reversely proportional to the median diameter of suspension particles in the range of 1 to 4 ${\mu}m$. In brief, the rainfastness of 5 fungicides tested on the pepper leaf was, in the early stage of raining, closely related to water solubility. But, as the raining is progressed, the effect of the unknown factor, which is related with the particle size of fungicides, becomes serious.

살균제 농약의 고추잎 표면에서의 내우성과 수용해 도와의 관계를 구명하기 위하여 수용해도가 다른 5종의 농약 수용액 혹은 농약 현탁액을 고추잎 표면에 점적처리하고 인공강우한 후 고추잎 표면의 농약 잔류율을 상호 비교하였다. 고추잎에 아세톤 수용액으로 점적처리된 살균제 농약은 인공강우량이 증가함에 따라 고추 잎 표면 잔류율이 급속히 감소하다가 점차 둔화되었으며, 인공강우 초기의 내우성은 농약의 수용해도에 반비례하였다. 수용해도가 18mg/L인 dimethomorph는 2.5mm의 강우에도 유효성분 모두가 소실되었다. 수화제 현탁액은 아세톤 수용액보다 내우성이 현저히 작았지만 수용해도가 작은 농약이 역시 내우성이 큰 것으로 나타났다. 평균입경이 작은 chlorothalonil과 mepanipyrim 액상수화제가 수화제보다 내우성이 컸으며, mepanipyrim 현탁액의 내우성은 입경과 반비례 관계를 나타내었다. 따라서 시험한 5 종의 살균제 농약의 고추 및 표면 내우성은 강우 초기에는 농약의 수용해도와 깊이 연관되어 있으며 후기로 갈수록 농약의 입경과 관계되는 미지 요인이 작용하는 것으로 밝혀졌다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bariuan lV, Reddy KN, and Wills GD (1999) Glyphosate injury, rainfastness, absorption, and translocation in purple nutsdege(Cyperus rotundus). Weed Tech 13, 112-119 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00045000
  2. Fagemess MJ and Penner D (1998) $^{14}C$-Trinexapac-ethyl absorption and translocation in kentucky bluegrass. Crop Sci 38, 1023-1027 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800040023x
  3. Feng PCC, Sandbrink, JJ, and Sammons RD (2000) Retention, uptake, and translocation of $^{14}C$-glyphosate from track-spray applications and correlation to rainfastness in velvetleaf(Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Tech 14, 127-132 https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014[0127:RUATOC]2.0.CO;2
  4. Jansen LL (1973) Enhancement of herbicides by silicone surfactants. Weed Sci 21, 130-135
  5. Kwon YW and Chung BJ (1995) Effect of Triton CS-7 surfactant on the physical properties and rainfastness of wettable powder pesticide sprays. In Adjuvants for Agrochemicals, pp.150-151, CRC Press, Boca Raton. FL, USA
  6. Leung JW, Sundaram A, and Webster GRB (1993) Optimizing adjuvant concentration for maximum translocation of glyphosate in trembling aspen. J Environm Sci Health 28, 505-526 https://doi.org/10.1080/03601239309372839
  7. Leung JW and Webster GRB (1994) Effect of adjuvants on rainfastness and herbicidal activity of glyphosate deposits on trembling aspen foliage. J Environmental Science and Health 29, 1169-1201 https://doi.org/10.1080/03601239409372922
  8. Manthey FA, Szelezniak EF, Anyszka ZM, and Nalewaja JD (1992) Foliar absorption and phytotoxicity of quizalofop with lipid compounds. Weed Sci 40, 558-562
  9. Miller DK, Griffin JL, and Richard Jr EP (1998) Johnsongrass (Sorghum hale pense) control and rainfastness with glyphosate and adjuvants. Weed Tech 12, 617-622 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00044468
  10. Reddy KN (2000) Factors affecting toxicity, absorption, and translocation of glyphosate in redvine(Brunnichia ovata). Weed Tech 14, 457-462 https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014[0457:FATAAT]2.0.CO;2
  11. Roggenbuck FC, Rowe L, Penner D, Petroff L, and Burow R. (1990) Icreasing postemergence herbicide efficacy and rainfastness with silicone adjuvants. Weed Tech 4, 576-580 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00026002
  12. Sun J, Foy CL, and Witt HL (1996) Effect of organosilicone surfactants on the rainfastness of primisulfuron in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Tech 10, 263-267 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00039920
  13. Sundaram KMS and Sundaram A (1994) Rain-washing of foliar deposits of Dimilin (TM) WP-25 formulated in four different carrier liquids. J Environm Sci Health 29, 757-783 https://doi.org/10.1080/03601239409372903
  14. Willis GH, Smith S, McDowell LL, and Southwick LM (1996) Carbaryl washoff from soybean plants. Arch of Environm Contam Toxicol 31, 239-243 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00212372

Cited by

  1. Dissipation, terminal residues and risk assessment of fluopicolide and its metabolite in cucumber under field conditions vol.187, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4924-5
  2. Modeling losses of copper-based fungicide foliar sprays in wash-off under simulated rain vol.12, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0445-3