DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Practical Use of Vegetated Porous Pavement for the Construction of Grass Parking Lot

잔디주차장 시공을 위한 잔디블록 활용방안

  • Han, Seung-Ho (Institute of Landscape Ecological Design, HANDSEL GREEN Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Kang, Jin-Hyoung (Institute of Landscape Ecological Design, HANDSEL GREEN Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Choi, Joon-Soo (Department of Landscape Architecture, Dankook University) ;
  • Yang, Geun-Mo (Department of Landscape Architecture, Dankook University) ;
  • Yoon, Yong-Han (Department of Forest Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Ku, Tae-Ik (Department of Landscape Architecture, Cheonan Yonam College) ;
  • Kim, Won-Tae (Department of Landscape Architecture, Cheonan Yonam College)
  • 한승호 ((주)한설그린 조경생태디자인연구소) ;
  • 강진형 ((주)한설그린 조경생태디자인연구소) ;
  • 최준수 (단국대학교 녹지조경학과) ;
  • 양근모 (단국대학교 녹지조경학과) ;
  • 윤용한 (건국대학교 산림과학과) ;
  • 구태익 (천안연암대학 환경조경과) ;
  • 김원태 (천안연암대학 환경조경과)
  • Published : 2009.09.30

Abstract

The vegetated porous pavement can be installed as an alternative way to replace the traditional pavement, which contributes less to the water circulation system in the urban area. This study aims to an investigation based on the shadow and pressure of the vehicle system, where the turfgrass get grown and the green block get constructed on the grassy parking lot. This study might achieve these conclusions, in the case of use 'green block' makes grass parking lot, plant a kind of 'zenith' and takes sod thickness 40 mm are more efficient for turfgrass growth in the early times. In the case of parking over 8 hours in a day, after 5 weeks turfgrass growth would come into reduce. So over 4 hours parking and after 9 weeks, we need consider to setting up green block in grassy parking lot. The grassy ground would get pressured by the vehicles' load and it would bring into some damage due to the load after 3 weeks. So we should put the grass's growth root point under the designed a top of 'green block' level. When the vehicle amounts and parking density is in a low level, it could be an environmentally friendly product.

Keywords

References

  1. 이창우, 문태훈, 홍민선, 서현교, 2000, 서울시 환경 용량 평가에 관한 연구II, 서울시정개발연구원 보고서, 2000-R-11, 1-179
  2. 서울특별시, 2000, 서울시 비오톱 현황조사 및 생태도시 조성지침수립, 서울특별시 보고서
  3. 김현수, 박근수, 안근영, 2002, 생태도시 조성 핵심 기술개발, 한국건설기술연구원 보고서
  4. 지재성, 김이호, 이상호, 김영석, 오현제, 유인균, 이수형, 김성은, 이정훈, 2005, 포장면의 환경성 향상 소재 개발, 한국건설기술연구원 보고서
  5. 이은희, 2003, 도시생태계개선을 위한 베를린시의 비오톱 면적요소, 한국환경복원녹화기술학회 03 춘계학술발표회 초록집, 41-44
  6. http://www.seoul.go.kr/seoul/citynews/newsdata/1251786 8736.htrnl
  7. 윤용한, 김원태, 2002, 도시녹지의 계층구조가 기온에 미치는 영향, 한국잔디학회지, 16(2), 107-114
  8. 신규환, 2003, 환경친화적 택지개발 방향 및 과제주거단지 생태조경설계를 중섬으로, 한국환경복원 녹화기술학회 03 춘계학술발표회 초록집, 2-13
  9. 환경부, 2005, 생태면적율 적용지침, 서울, 환경부
  10. National turfgrass evaluation program, 1997, National Zoysiagrass test-1996, Agricultural Research Service and Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Rrogress Report, 98-4