한국의류학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles)

  • 제33권6호
  • /
  • Pages.968-979
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 1225-1151(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-0793(eISSN)
한국의류학회 (The Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

의류매장 매니저와 20대 소비자의 매스커스터마이제이션 도입 결정요인

Determinants of Mass Customization Adoption in the Apparel Industry: Retail Managers' and Young Consumers' Point of View

  • 김수연 (연세대학교 의류환경학과) ;
  • ;
  • 고애란 (연세대학교 의류환경학과)
  • Kim, Su-Yeon (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Yonsei University) ;
  • Fiorito, Susan S. (Dept. of Textiles & Consumer Sciences, Florida State University) ;
  • Koh, Ae-Ran (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Yonsei University)
  • 발행 : 2009.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은, 의류산업 리테일 매니저의 매스커스터마이제이션 도입 의향과 의류소비자의 매스커스터마이제이션 제품 구입 의향에, 영향을 미치는 4가지 특성적 요인을 분석함에 있다. 매스커스터마이제이션 도입 의향을 결정하는 4가지 특성적 요인으로, 기업, 개인, 기술, 환경적 특성이 제시되었다. 66명의 매니저와 274명의 20대 소비자를 대상으로 설문조사하여, 제시된 가설 중 7개의 가설이 채택되었다. 매스커스터마이제이션 도입 의향에 유의한 영향을 미치는 요인으로는, 의류매장 및 매니저의 기술, 환경적 특성, 그리고 의류소비자의 개인, 기술, 환경적 특성으로 나타났다. 가장 유의한 영향을 미치는 요인으로 기술적 특성이었는데, 개인 주문생산 서비스를 실현하기 위해 소비자와 원활한 상호작용이 가능한 기술 환경적 시스템 구축이 선행되어야 할 것으로 나타났다. 이밖에 3D Body Scanning, QR, IT 기술들의 필요성 인지도 및 도입 의향과, 매스커스터마이제이션 도입 의향과는 매우 유의한 상관관계가 있었다. 본 연구의 또 한가지 결실은, CRM 도입에 대한 매니저 및 소비자의 높은 관심도였다. 의류소비자 개개인의 니즈에 맞춘 생산 설계를 통한 유연생산시스템과 함께, 고객과 직접 교류하는 소비자 중심의 경영은 메스커스터마이제이션 도입의 발판이 될 것으로 나타났다.

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the willingness to adopt mass customization and four proposed characteristics: organizational, individual, technological, and environmental. Retail managers' and consumers' point of view was separately examined to distinguish their characteristics and willingness to adopt mass customization. The sample of this study consisted of 66 managers and 274 consumers in their twenties. The researcher obtained seven findings from the hypotheses testing. The determinants of mass customization adoption were managers' technology and environmental characteristics, and consumers' individual, technology, and environmental characteristics. The most influential variables for the willingness to adopt mass customization were technology characteristics and retailer's customer relationship management process, where customer satisfaction and customer relationships are the top priority in an organization.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(1), 179−211 https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Barki, H., & Hartwick, J. (1994). Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science, 40, 44-66
  3. Bearden, W. O., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1989). Handbook of marketing scales: Muti-item measures for marketing and consumer behavior research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication
  4. Brown, S. P., & Peterson, R. A. (1993). Antecedents and consequences of salespersons job satisfaction: Metaanalysis and assessment of causal effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(1), 63−77 https://doi.org/10.2307/3172514
  5. Choko, R., Howell, B., & Bellenger, G. (1986). Superordinate goals and intergroup behaviour: the effect of role ambiguity and status on intergroup attitudes and task performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17(1), 131−143
  6. Cosbey, S. (2001). Clothing interest, clothing satisfaction, and self-perceptions of sociability, emotional stability, and dominance. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 29(2), 145−153 https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2001.29.2.145
  7. Davis, S. M. (1987). Future perfect. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley
  8. Duray, R. (1997). Mass customization configurations: An empirical investigation of manufacturing practices of customization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus
  9. Duray, R., Ward, P., Milligan, G., & Berry, W. (2000). Four approaches to mass customization: Configurations and empirical validation. Journal of Operational Management, 16(4), 605−625
  10. Engel, K., & Blackwell, G. (1982). Relative advertising channel effectiveness: A test of learning vs. involvement orientations. Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 4(3), 71−85
  11. Fiore, A. M., Lee, S. E., Kunz, G., & Campbell, J. R. (2001). Relationships between optimum stimulation level and willingness to use mass customization options. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 3(4), 360−368 https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022572
  12. Gilmore, J. H., & Pine, B. J. (1997). The four faces of mass customization. Boston, MC: Harvard Business School Press
  13. Goldsberry E., Shim, S., & Gehrt, K. (1996) Socializationbased approach to predicting retail career preference and choice. Journal of Marketing Education, 21(1), 14−25
  14. Graeber, M. (1999). An investigation of store manager's interest in mass customization. Unpublished master's thesis, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
  15. Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science, 40(4), 44−66
  16. Harvey, M. & Tersine, R. (1998). Global customization of markets has arrived. European Management Journal, 16(1), 79−90 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(97)00076-5
  17. Huffman, C., & Kahn, B. E. (1998). Variety for sales: Mass customization or mass confusion. Journal of Retailing, 74(4), 491−513 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80105-5
  18. Istook, C. L. (2002). Enabling mass customization: Computer- driven alteration methods. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 14(1), 61−76 https://doi.org/10.1108/09556220210420345
  19. Jayachandran, S., Sharma, S., Kaufman, P., & Raman, P. (2004). The role of relational information processes and technology use in customer relationship management. Unpublished master's thesis, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
  20. Kamali, N., & Loker, S. (2002). Mass Customization: Oniine consumer involvement in product design. Journal of Higher Ed Conversation Cyberspace Web Commerce, 7(4), 111−127
  21. Keeling, K. A. (1997). Technology acceptance modeling and the adoption of electronic shopping options. Proceedings of the Institute for Retail Studies, Belgium, 9(1), 10−15
  22. Kotha, S. (1995). Mass Customization: Implementing the emerging paradigm for competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 21−42 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160916
  23. Kotler, P. (1997). Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation and control (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NY: Prentice Hall
  24. Laurent, G., & Kapferer, J. N. (1985). Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 22(1), 41−54 https://doi.org/10.2307/3151549
  25. Lee, S. E., & Chen, J. C. (2000). Mass customization methodology for an apparel industry with a future. Journal of Industry Technology, 16(1), 2−8
  26. Li, H., Kuo, C., & Russell, M. G. (1999). The impact of perceived channel utilities, shopping orientations, and demographics on the consumer's online buying behavior. Journal for Computer Mediated Communication, 5, 1-23
  27. Lowson, R. H. (2001). Customized operational strategies for retailers in fast-moving consumer industries. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 11(2), 201−224 https://doi.org/10.1080/713770581
  28. Peterson. R. A., Balasubramanizan, B. A., & Bronnenberg, B. J. (1997). Exploring the implications of the Internet to consumer marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 329−346 https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070397254005
  29. Pine, B. J. (1993). Mass customization: The new frontier in business competition. Boston, MC: Harvard Business School Press
  30. Roger, E., & Scheifer, P. (1993) Involvement and perceived brand similarities/differences: The need for process oriented models. Advances in Consumer Research, 17(1), 144−149
  31. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation. New York: The Free Press
  32. Segal, R. A. (1986). Developer/adopter relationships in the adoption of CAD/CAM systems: Implications for operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 6(7), 87−101 https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054774