References
- 식품의약품안전청. 생물학적동등성시험 기준 (고시 제 2008-22호). 서울: 식품의약품안전청, 2008
- Hauschke D, Steinijans VW, Diletti E. A distribution-free procedure for the statistical analysis of bioequivalence studies. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1990; 28: 72- 78.
- Schulz HU, Steinijans VW. Striving for standards in bioequivalence assessment: a review. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1992; 30: S1-S6.
- The National Institute of Health Sciences (NIHS). Guideline for Bioequivalence Studies of Generic Product. Tokyo: The National Institute of Health Sciences (NIHS), 1997
- The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for industry: bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for orally administered drug products- general considerations. Rockville: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 2003
- The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for industry: statistical Approaches Establishing Bioequivalence. Rockville: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 2001
- The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Guidance on the Investigation of Bioequivalence. Rondon: The European Medicines Agency (EMEA), 2008
- Health Canada. Guidance for Industry, Conduct and Analysis of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies- Part A. Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 1992
- http://bebac.at/Guidelines.htm
- http://www.fda.gov/CDER/regulatory/default.htm
- http://www.emea.europa.eu/index/indexh1.htm
- http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/index-eng.php
- Blume HH, Midha KK. Bio-international '92 Conference on Bioavailability, Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Studies. Pharm Res 1993; 10: 1806-1811. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018998803920
- Haidar SH, Davit B, Chen ML, et al. Bioequivalence approaches for highly variable drugs and drugs products. Pharm Res 2008; 25(1): 237-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-007-9434-x
- Tothfalusi L, Endrenyi L, Midha KK, et al. Evaluation of the bioequivalence of highly-variable drugs and drug products. Pharm Res 2001; 18(6): 728-733. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011015924429
- Boddy AW, Snikeri FC, Kringle RO, et al. An approach for widening the bioequivalence acceptance limits in the case of highly variable drugs. Pharm Res 1995; 12: 1865-1868. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016219317744
- http://www.aapspharmaceutica.com/
- Health Canada, Therapeutic Products Directorate (TPD). Discussion paper on "Bioequivalence requirements - highly variable drugs and highly variable drug products: issues and options". Expert Advisory Committee on Bioavailability and Bioequivalence (EAC-BB) Meeting, June 26-27, 2003.
- Buice RG, Subramanian VS, Duchin KL, et al. Bioequivalence of a highly variable drug: an experience with nadolol. Pharm Res 1996; 13(7): 1109-1115. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016031313065
- Davit BM, Conner DP, Fabian-Fritsch B, et al. Highly Variable Drugs: Observations from Bioequivalence Data Submitted to the FDA for New Generic Drug Applications, The AAPS Journal 2008; 10(1): 148-156. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-008-9015-x
- Salmon S. Statistical design and evaluation of bioequivalence studies average bioequivalence. WHO Prequalification program workshop, Kiev, Ukraine, June 25- 27, 2007
- Tothfalusi L, Endrenyi L. Evaluation of some properties of individual bioequivalence (IBE) from replicate-design studies. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2001; 39(4): 162-166 https://doi.org/10.5414/CPP39162
- Welling PG, Tse FL. Factors contributing to variability in drug pharmacokinetics. I. Absorption. J Clin Hosp Pharm 1984; 9(3): 163-179
- Routledge PA. Factors contributing to variability in drug pharmacokinetics. II. Drug distribution. J Clin Hosp Pharm 1985; 10(1): 15-23
- Jack DB. Factors contributing to variability in drug pharmacokinetics. III. Metabolism. J Clin Hosp Pharm 1985; 10(1) 25-43
- Regardh CG. Factors contributing to variability in drug pharmacokinetics. IV. Renal excretion. J Clin Hosp Pharm 1985; 10(4): 337-349
- Midha KK, Shah VP, Singh GJ, et al. Conference report: Bio-International 2005. J Pharm Sci 2007; 96(4): 747-754 https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.20786
- Patnaik R. Highly Variable Drugs and Drug Products: A Rationale for Solution of a Persistent Problem. In: AAPS Workshop on BE, BCS and Beyond, Bethesda, USA, May 21, 2007
- Schuirmann DJ. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm 1987; 15: 657-680 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419
- Patterson SD, Zariffa NM, Montague TH, et al. Nontraditional study designs to demonstrate average bioequivalence for highly variable drug products. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2001; 57(9): 663-670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280100371
- Garcia-Arieta A. Highly Variable Drugs. In; Understanding Bioequivalence of Generic Drugs, A Worldwide Review, Monte Carlo, June 18, 2006
- Davit BM, highly variable drugs-bioequivalence issues: FDA proposal under consideration. In; Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science, October 6, 2006 http:// www.fda.gov/ ohrms/dockets/ac/06/slides/2006-4241s2_5.htm
- Haidar SH, Evaluation of a scaling approach for highly variable drugs. In: Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science, Rockville, USA, October 6, 2006
- Paul Fackler, Bioequivalence for highly variable drugs: session III. American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, San Diego, USA, November 11-15, 2007
- Committee for medicinal products for human use (CHMP), Concept paper for an addendum to the note for guidance on the investigation of bioavailability and bioequivalence: evaluation of bioequivalence of highly variable drugs and drug products. European Medicines Agency (EMEA), London, April 27, 2006
- Hauck WW, Parekh A, Lesko LJ, et al. Limits of 80%- 125% for AUC and 70%-143% for Cmax. What is the impact on bioequivalence studies? Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2001; 39(8) :350-355 https://doi.org/10.5414/CPP39350
- Tsang YC, Pop R, Gordon P, et al. High variability in drug pharmacokinetics complicates determination of bioequivalence: experience with verapamil. Pharm Res 1996; 13(6):846-850 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016040825844
- Midha KK, Rawson MJ, Hubbard JW. The bioequivalence of highly variable drugs and drug products. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005; 43(10) :485-98 https://doi.org/10.5414/CPP43485
- Haidar SH, Davit B, Chen ML, et al. Bioequivalence approaches for highly variable drugs and drug products. Pharm Res 2008; 25(1): 237-41 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-007-9434-x
- Belisle M, Highly Variable Drugs and Drug Products (HVD/HVDP) Overview. SFBC Anapharm Symposium, Newark, April 22, 2004
- el-Tahtawy AA, Tozer TN, Harrison F, et al. Evaluation of bioequivalence of highly variable drugs using clinical trial simulations. II: Comparison of single and multiple-dose trials using AUC and Cmax. Pharm Res. 1998; 15(1): 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011961006297
- Blume H, Zhong D, Elze M. Advantages of a steady-state crossover design in assessment of bioequivalence of highly variable drugs: propafenone. European journal of pharmaceutical sciences 1994; 2(5): 385-393 https://doi.org/10.1016/0928-0987(94)00068-9
- Jackson AJ. The role of metabolites in bioequivalency assessment. III. Highly variable drugs with linear kinetics and first-pass effect. Pharm Res 2000; 17(11): 1432-1436. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007581016352
- Lalonde RL, Lessard D, Gaudreault J. Population pharmacokinetics of terfenadine. Pharm Res 1996; 13(6): 832-838. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016036624935
- Patterson SD, Zariffa NM, Montague TH, et al. Nontraditional study designs to demonstrate average bioequivalence for highly variable drug products. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2001; 57(9): 663-670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280100371
- Karalis V, Symillides M, Macheras P. Novel scaled average bioequivalence limits based on GMR and variability considerations. Pharm Res 2004; 21(10): 1933-1942 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHAM.0000045249.83899.ae
- Tothfalusi, L ; Endrenyi, L ; Midha, K K. Scaling or wider bioequivalence limits for highly variable drugs and for the special case of Cmax. International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics 2003; 41(5): 217-225 https://doi.org/10.5414/CPP41217
- Pan G, Wang Y. Average bioequivalence evaluation: general methods for pilot trials. J Biopharm Stat. 2006; 16(2): 207-225 https://doi.org/10.1080/10543400500508887
- Stavchansky S, Interchangeability of Multisource Drug Products Containing Highly Variable Drugs. Kiev, Ukraine, June 25-27, 2007
- Tothfalusi, Laszlo ; Endrenyi, Laszlo, Limits for the Scaled Average Bioequivalence of Highly Variable Drugs and Drug Products. Pharm Res, 2003; 20(3): 382-389 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022695819135
- Wijnand HP. Assessment of average, population and individual bioequivalence in two- and four-period crossover studies. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2003; 70(1): 21-35 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2607(02)00019-6
- Nakai K, Fujita M, Tomita M. Comparison of average and population bioequivalence approach. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2002; 40(9): 431-438 https://doi.org/10.5414/CPP40431
- Chervoneva I, Hyslop T, Hauck WW. A multivariate test for population bioequivalence. Stat Med 2007; 26(6): 1208-1223. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2605
- Canafax DM, Irish WD, Moran HB, et al. An individual bioequivalence approach to compare the intrasubject variability of two ciclosporin formulations, SangCya and Neoral. Pharmacology 1999; 59(2): 78-88 https://doi.org/10.1159/000028307
- Endrenyi L, Tothfalusi L. Subject-by-formulation interaction in determinations of individual bioequivalence: bias and prevalence. Pharm Res 1999; 16(2): 186-190 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018899504711
- Chow SC, Shao J, Wang H. Individual bioequivalence testing under 2x3 designs. Stat Med 2002; 21(5): 629-648 https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1056
- Potvin D, DiLiberti CE, Hauck WW, et al. Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs. Pharm Stat 2008; 7(4): 245-262 https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.294
- Mathew T, Paul G, A p-value for testing the equivalence of the variances of a bivariate normal distribution. J Stat Plan Inference 2008 ;138(12): 3982-3992 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2008.02.005
- Sunkara G, Reynolds CV, Pommier F, et al. Evaluation of a pharmacokinetic interaction between valsartan and simvastatin in healthy subjects. Curr Med Res Opin 2007; 23(3): 631-640 https://doi.org/10.1185/030079906X167471