Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

  • 제35권4호
  • /
  • Pages.229-239
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 2234-7550(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-5930(eISSN)
대한구강악안면외과학회 (The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons)
권호 표지

3-D CT를 이용한 악교정수술후의 하악 과두 위치와 하악폭경 및 하악각의 평가

3-D CT EVALUATION OF CONDYLE HEAD POSITION, MANDIBULAR WIDTH, AND MANDIBULAR ANGLE AFTER MANDIBULAR SETBACK SURGERY

  • 김재원 (대구파티마병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 이동현 (대구파티마병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 이수연 (대구파티마병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 김재현 (대구파티마병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 이상한 (경북대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Kim, Jae-Won (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Hyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Su-Youn (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Hyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Han (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 발행 : 2009.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the change in condylar position, width, and angle before and after orthognathic surgery using 3-dimensional computed tomograph. Pre and posterative 3-D CT was taken on 38 patients and through axial, frontal, sagittal measurements and by 3-dimensional reconstruction, the changes in condylar postion, mandibular width and angle were analyzed and others such as the difference in gender, operation and fixation method, setback length and in relation with temporomandibular disorders were done together too. The results were as follows: The inward rotation of condyle in axial condylar angle, the forward movement of right condyle in sagittal anterior-posterior distance, the superior movement of both condyles in sagittal superior-inferior distance, the decrease in gonial angle, the increase in mandibular width, the decrease in distance between the axial coronoid process distance and the increase in the frontal intercondylar distance were statistically significant. There were no statistically significant changes in gender difference, however in the difference in operation method, change in the gonial angle was observed and there was more change in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy group compared to two-jaw surgery group. In the difference in fixation method, the decrease in axial coronoid process distance and the change in sagittal anterior-posterior distance were statistically significant. In the difference in setback, the increase in setback didn't relate directly with the increased change in condyle position. In the relation with temporomandibular disorder, changes in left axial condylar angle and axial coronoid process distance were statistically significant. Changes in condylar position could be observed after the orthognathic surgery but it doesn't seem to have much of a clinical importance. The orthognathic surgery is effective in decreasing the mandibular angle, and it is not related with the temporomandibular disorder.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Edward E. A method to passively align the sagittal ramus osteotomy segments. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:2125-30 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.02.005
  2. Ueki K, Degerliyurt K, Hashiba Y, Marukawa K, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto E. Horizontal changes in the condylar head after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with bent plate fixation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:656-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.016
  3. Choi KY, Lee SH. Evaluation of condylar position using computed tomograph following bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Kor Maxillofac Plast Resconst Surg. 1996;18:570-93
  4. Baek SH, Kim TK, Kim MJ. Is there any difference in the condylar position and angulation after asymmetric mandibular setback? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:155-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.12.018
  5. Yoo JY. The postoperative condylar position related to temporomandibular discomfort in sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Kor Maxillofac Plast Reconst Surg. 1997;19:130-4
  6. Ueki K, Marukawa K, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto E. Condylar and temporomandibular joint disc postitions after mandibular osteotomy for prognathism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:1424-32 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.36098
  7. Jonas PB, Joe R, Karin BB, Sten I, Phillip DV, Eugene EK. Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:395-403 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.31227
  8. Kim IH, Han CH, Yoo SY. Changes in gonial angle and mandibular width after orthognathic surgery in mandibular prognathic patients. J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;32:129-37
  9. Park HD, Kwon TK, Lee SH. Analysis of facial soft-tissue changes after mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Kor Maxillofac Plast Reconst Surg 1996;18:87-108
  10. Tyndall DA, Renner JB, Phillips C, Matteson SR. Positional changes of the mandibular condyle assesed by three-dimensional computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 1992;50:1164-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(92)90147-R
  11. Song JC, Jang HJ, Lee SH. evaluation of the accuracy and reliability of 3-D CT for measurement of maxillofacial region. J Kor Maxillofac Plast Reconst Surg 2000;22:500-12
  12. Kang YK, Kim JR, Yang DK. A cephalometric and panoramic analysis of the changes of the condylar position after orthognathic surgery. J Kor Maxillofac Plast Reconst Surg 2000;22:411-9
  13. Spitzer WJ, Rettinger G, Sitzmann F. Computerized tomography examination for the detection of positional changes in the temporomandibular joint after ramus osteotomies with screw fixation. J Maxillofacial Surg 1984;12:139-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0503(84)80230-1
  14. Christof UJ, Isabella MV. Stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy setback surgery with rigid internal fixation: a systemic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:1634-43 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.05.115
  15. Ueki K, Hashiba Y, Marukawa K, Alam S, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto E. Skeletal stability afer mandibular setback surgery : bicortical fixation using a 2.0-mm locking plate system versus monocortical fixation using a nonlocking plate system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:900-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.033
  16. Ueki K, Marukawa K, Shimada M, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto E. Change in condylar long axis and skeletal stability following sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathia. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 2005;63:1494-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.06.013
  17. Lee W, Park JU. Three-dimensional evaluation of positional change of the condyle after mandibular setback by means of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;94:305-9 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.126452
  18. Lee SK, Kim KW, Kim CH. Postoperative positional change of condyle after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy associated with mandibular asymmetry. J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;30:359-67
  19. Choi WH, Kim JH, Park YW. A clinical study on the effects of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on the postoperative condylar positional changes in the mandibular prognathism. J Kor Maxillofac Plast Reconst Surg 2003;25:525-32
  20. Reitzik M. Skeletal and dental changes after surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. J Oral Surg 1980;38:109-16 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(74)90321-1
  21. Kwon YH, Jang HJ, Lee SH. Clinical analysis of gonial angle change after orthognathic surgery in patients with the mandibular prognathism. J Kor Maxillofac Plast Reconst Surg 2000;22:206-16
  22. Kang SH, Kim TJ, Shin HK. A clinical study of changes in gonial angle between pre and post orthognathic surgery in mandibular prognathic patients. J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;24:193-7
  23. Kim YS, Ryu DM. Changes of temporomandibular joint symptoms after orthognathic surgery in the asymmetric prognathism patients. J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;33:518-23
  24. Mark W. Bicortical screw stabilization of sagittal split osteotomies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:1477-84 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2003.07.003
  25. Chung IH, Yoo CK, Lee EK, Ihm JA, Park CJ, Lim JS. Postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomies for a mandibular setback with monocortical plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:446-52 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.643
  26. Shetty V, Freymiller E, McBrearty D. Experimental analysis of functional stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomies secured by miniplates and position screws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:1317-24 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90490-5
  27. Murphy MT, Haug RH, Barber JE. An in vitro comparison of the mechanical characteristics of three sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:489-94 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90699-6
  28. Tharanon W. Comparison between the rigidity of bicortical screws and a miniplate for fixation of a mandibular setback after a simulated bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;56:1055-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90255-5
  29. Hackney FL, Van Sickels JE, Nummikoski PV. Condylar displacement in temporomandibular joint dysfuncion following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and rigid fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;46:223-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(89)90221-8
  30. Lee HK, Jang HJ, Lee SH. Evaluation of condylar displacement using computer tomography after the surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. J Kor Maxillofac Plast Reconst Surg 1998;20:191-200
  31. Lee DH, Oh SH, Suh CH, Kim JB. A study on the size of TMD patient's condyle head. J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;27:417- 22
  32. Onizawa K, Schmelzeisen R, Vogt S. Alteration of temporomandibular joint symptoms after orthognatic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:117-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(95)90383-6
  33. Timmis DP, Aragon SB, Van Sickels JE. Masticatory dysfunction with rigid and non-rigid osteosynthesis of sagittal split osteotomies. Oral Surg 1986;62:119-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(86)90027-7