Journal of the Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회지)

Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회)
권호 표지

MICRO-TENSILE BONDING STRENGTH OF REGIONAL PRIMARY MOLAR DENTIN

유구치 상아질의 각 부위에 적용된 수종의 복합레진 접착제의 미세인장접착강도에 관한 연구

  • You, Jung-Eun (Seoul Adventist Dental Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Yeong-Chul (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Chio, Sung-Chul (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Park, Jae-Hong (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University)
  • 유정은 (서울위생치과병원) ;
  • 최영철 (경희대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 최성철 (경희대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 박재홍 (경희대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
  • Published : 2009.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the micro-tensile bond strength (${\mu}TBS$) of four luting resin to regional dentin of human primary teeth. Dentin from non-carious primary molars were prepared from different regions (s, superficial dentin; d, deep dentin; c, cervical dentin), and divided into groups based on anatomical locations and types of luting resins (Scotchbond Multi-purpose : SB ; One-Step : OS ; AdheSE Bond : ASE ; G-Bond : GB) : SB-s, SB-d, SB-c; OS-s, OS-d, OS-c; ASE-s, ASE-d, ASE-c ; GB-s, GB-d, GB-c. Luting resins were used according to the manufacturers' instructions, to bond $Light-Core^{TM}$ Core Build-Up Composite) to the exposed dentin specimens in the light-curing mode. After storage for 1 day, ${\mu}TBS$ was tested at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. Data were analyzed with T-test and two-way ANOVA. The bonding interface and fractography analyses were performed with SEM. The results were as follows : 1. ${\mu}TBS$ to superficial dentin was significantly higher than to deep dentin for SB(p<0.05). But there were no significant differences in regional ${\mu}TBS$ among OS, ASE, GB(p>0.05). 2. There were no significant differences in ${\mu}TBS$ to superficial dentin among each groups. But, in deep dentin, ${\mu}TBS$ of SB-d was significantly lower than those of OS-d, ASE-d, and GB-d(p<0.05). ${\mu}TBS$ of OS-d was significantly higher than those of GB-d(p<0.05), but there were no significant differences in ${\mu}TBS$ of ASEd. There were no significant differences among ${\mu}TBS$ of ASE-d, OS-d, and GB-d.

본 연구는 유구치 상아질의 각기 다른 부위(표층부, 심층부, 치경부)에서 복합레진 접착제의 접착강도를 비교, 평가하기 위하여 임상에서 흔히 사용하고 있는 서로 다른 4종의 접착방식(3-step total etch: 1군, 2-step total etch: 2군, 2-step self-etch: 3군, all-in-one: 4군)을 적용하고 복합 레진 ($Light-Core^{TM}$ Core Build-Up Composite)을 적층한 후, 미세인장접착강도를 비교하였을 때 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 접착방식간의 비교에서 레진의 접착방식에 따른 상아질 각 부위에서의 미세인장접착강도는 제 1군이 표층부에서 뚜렷이 높았으나(p<0.05) 2, 3, 4군은 부위에 따른 차이가 없었다. 2. 부위별 미세인장접착강도를 비교하여 보았을 때 상아질 표층부에서의 미세인장접착강도는 레진의 접착 방식간에 차이가 없었으나, 심층부에서는 2군, 3군, 4군 및 1군의 순으로 나타났고(p<0.05), 치경부에서는 2군과 3군이 1군과 4군에 비하여 현저히 높았다(p<0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. McCabe JF, Walls AWG : Application of dentalmaterials. 8th ed. Malden, Blackwell Science, 189-201, 1998.
  2. Buonocore MG : A simple method of increasing theadhesion of acrylic flling materials to enamel surfaces.J Dent Res, 34:849-54, 1955. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345550340060801
  3. Buonocore MG, Matsui A, Gwinnett AJ :Penetration of resin dental materials into enamelsurfaces with reference to bonding. Arch Oral Biol,13:61-70, 1968. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(68)90037-X
  4. Kugel G, Ferrari M : The science of bonding : Fromfirst to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc, 131:20-25, 2000.
  5. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH : Hybridization of dentalhard tissues. Tokyo, Quintessence, 16-89, 1998.
  6. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM : Dentin permeabilityand dentin adhesion: review. J Dent, 25:355-372,1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00057-7
  7. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E : The promotionof adhesion by the infiltration of monomersinto tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res, 16:265-273, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820160307
  8. Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, et al. : Thedentin substrate: structure and properties related tobonding. J Dent, 25:441-458, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00065-6
  9. Burrow MF, Takakura H, Nakajima M, et al. : Theinfluence of age and depth of dentin on bonding.Dent Mater, 10:241-246, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90068-X
  10. Mixson JM, Spencer P, Moore DL, et al. : Surfacemorphology and chemical characterization of abrasion/erosion lesions. Am J Dent, 8:5-9, 1995.
  11. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Vichi A, et al. : Bondingof all-porcelain crown: structural characteristics ofthe substrate. Dent Mater, 17:156-164, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00059-2
  12. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, et al. : Relationshipbetween surface area for adhesion and tensile bondstrength. evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test.Dent Mater, 10:236-240, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1
  13. Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, et al. : Regionalmeasurement of resin- dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res, 78:699-705, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780021001
  14. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL : Setting stressin composite resin in relation to configuration of therestoration. J Dent Res, 66:1636-9, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660110601
  15. Nakagima M, Sano H, Buyrrow MF, et al. : Tensilebond strength and SEM evaluation of caries-affecteddentin using dentin adhesives, J Dent Res,74:1679-88, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740100901
  16. Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T : Bovine teethas possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J DentRes, 62:1076-1081, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620101501
  17. Fusayama T, Nakamura M, Kurosaki N, et al. :Non-pressure adhesion of new adhesive restorativeresin. J Dent Res, 58:1364-1370, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345790580041101
  18. Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y : Bonding to intact dentin.J Dent Res, 75:1706-15, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750091401
  19. Tay FR, Pashley DH : Dental adhesives of thefuture. J Adhes Dent, 4:91-103, 2002.
  20. Tay FR, Pashley DH : Have dentin adhesivesbecome too hydrophilic? J Can Dent Assoc, 69:726-731, 2003.
  21. Haller B : Recent developments in dentin bonding.Am J Dent, 13:44-50, 2000.
  22. 이상엽, 이광희, 김대업 : 7세대 결합제의 미세누출에 관한연구. 대한소아치과학회지, 33:422-428, 2006.
  23. Nakaoki Y, Sasakawa W, Horiuchi S, et al. : Effectof double-application of all-in-one adhesives ondentin bonding. J Dent, 33:765-772, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.02.007
  24. Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, et al. :Microtensile bond strength between adhesivecements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater, 19:199-205, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00030-1
  25. Yanga B, Ludwig K, Adelung R, et al. : Micro-tensilebond strength of three luting resins to humanregional dentin. Dent Mater, 22:45-56, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.009
  26. Proenca JP, Polido M, Osorio E, et al. : Dentinregional bond strength of self-etch and total-etchadhesive systems. Dent Mater, 23:1542-48, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.02.001
  27. Burrow MF, Nopnakeepong U, Phrukkanon S : Acomparison of microtensile bond strengths of severaldentin bonding systems to primary and permanentdentin. Dent Mater, 18:239-245, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00041-0
  28. Bordin-Aykroyd S, Sefton J, Davies EH : In vitrobond strengths of three current dentin adhesives to primary and permanent teeth. Dent Mater, 8:144-6,1992.
  29. Salama FS, Tao L : Comparison of Gluma bondstrength to primary vs permanent dentin. PediatrDent, 13:163-5, 1991.
  30. Courson F, Bouter D, Ruse ND, et al. : Bondstrengths of nine current dentine adhesive systemsto primary and permanent teeth. J Oral Rehabil,32;296-303, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01412.x
  31. 송은주, 김재문, 김신 등 : Bovine teeth에 대한 수 종 상아질 접착제의 미세인장강도. 대한소아치과학회지, 34;420-429, 2007.
  32. Lisa AK, David GB, Shereen A, et al. : Bondstrengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesivesystems. J Prosthet Dent, 97:216-22, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.013
  33. Sidhu SK, Omata Y, Tanaka T, et al. : Bondingcharacteristics of newly developed All-in-OneAdhesives. J Biomed Mater Res, 80:297-303, 2007.